Does attention follow the motion in the "shooting line" illusion?

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 279-291

  Hamm, Jeff P ^a   Klein, Raymond M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHTING; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0036480661     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195792     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & LAW, M. B. (2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 818-833.
2. BRYSBAERT, M. (1990). A warning about millisecond timing in Turbo Pascal. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 344-345.
3. CAI, C., & CHEN, L. (1993). Attention directed by precues has different effects on discrimination of target lines presented alone and connected to a context. In Seventh International Conference on Event Perception and Action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. CROSBIE, J. (1989). A simple Turbo Pascal 4.0 program for millisecond timing on the IBM PC/XT/AT. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 21, 408-413.
5. DOWNING, P. E., & TREISMAN, A. M. (1997). The line-motion illusion: Attention or impletion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 768-779.
6. EGLY, R., DRIVER, J., & RAFAL, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
7. ERIKSEN, C. W., PAN, K., & BOTELLA, J. (1993). Attentional distribution in visual space. Psychological Research, 56, 5-13.
8. HEATHCOTE, A. (1988). Screen control and timing routines for the IBM microcomputer family using a high-level language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 289-297.
9. HIKOSAKA, O., MIYAUCHI, S., & SHIMOJO, S. (1991). Focal visual attention produces motion sensation in lines. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 32, 716.
10. HIKOSAKA, O., MIYAUCHI, S., & SHIMOJO, S. (1993a). Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation. Vision Research, 33, 1219-1240.
11. HIKOSAKA, O., MIYAUCHI, S., & SHIMOJO, S. (1993b). Voluntary and stimulus-induced attention detected as motion sensation. Perception, 22, 517-526.
12. JOLICŒUR, P., & VAN SELST, M. (1993). A computationally simple solution for the sample-size bias effect on median reaction time. Unpublished manuscript.
13. JONIDES, J. (1980). Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 3, 103-112.
14. KANIZSA, G. (1951). Sulla polarizzazione del movimento gamma [On the polarization of Gamma motion]. Archivo di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria, 3, 224-267.
15. KANIZSA, G. (1979). Organization in vision: Essays on Gestalt perception. New York: Praeger.
16. KEPPLE, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17. KLEIN, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
18. KLEIN, R. M., & CHRISTIE, J. C. (1996). Comparison of illusory line motion following exogenous and endogenous orienting of attention. Investigative Opthamology & Visual Science, 37, S530.
19. KLEIN, R. M., & TAYLOR, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). New York: Academic Press.
20. LABERGE, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 371-379.
21. LUPIÁÑEZ, J., MILÁN, E. G., TORNAY, F. J., MADRID, E., & TUDELA, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1241-1254.
22. MACQUISTAN, A. D. (1997). Object-based allocation of visual attention in response to exogenous, but not endogenous, spatial precues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 512-515.
23. MILLER, J. (1988). A warning about median reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 539-543.
24. POSNER, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
25. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, A. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma and D. Bowhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). London: Erlbaum.
26. POSNER, M. I., COHEN, A., & RAFAL, R. D. (1982). Neural systems control of spatial orienting. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 298, 187-198.
27. REICHARDT, W. (1959). Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In W. A. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory communication (pp. 303-318). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. RO, T., & RAFAL, R. D. (1999). Components of relexive visual orienting to moving objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 826-836.
29. SCHMIDT, W. C. (1998). In defence of gradient theories of illusory line motion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
30. SCHMIDT, W. C. (2000). Endogenous attention and illusory line motion reexamined. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 980-996.
31. SCHMIDT, W. C., & KLEIN, R. M. (1997). A spatial gradient of acceleration and temporal extension underlies three illusions of motion. Perception, 26, 857-874.
32. STELMACH, L. B., & HERDMAN, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 539-550.