Computational theory and cognition in representational momentum and related types of displacement: A reply to Kerzel

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 174-177

  Hubbard, Timothy L ^a  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748054472     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193830     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. COOPER, L. A., & MUNGER, M. P. (1993). Extrapolating and remembering positions along cognitive trajectories: Uses and limitations of analogies to physical motion. In N. Eilan, R. McCarthy, & B. Brewer (Eds.), Spatial representation: Problems in philosophy and psychology (pp. 112-131). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
2. FREYD, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94, 427-438.
3. FREYD, J. J., & FINKE, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 126-132.
4. FREYD, J. J., & FINKE, R. A. (1985). A velocity effect for representational momentum. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 443-446.
5. FUTTERWEIT, L. R., & BEILIN, H. (1994). Recognition memory for movement in photographs: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 163-179.
6. HUBBARD, T. L. (1994). Judged displacement: A modular process? American Journal of Psychology, 107, 359-373.
7. HUBBARD, T. L. (1995). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 322-338.
8. HUBBARD, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822-851.
9. HUBBARD, T. L., & BHARUCHA, J. J. (1988). Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 211-221.
10. HUBBARD, T. L., BLESSUM, J. A., & RUPPEL, S. E. (2001). Representational momentum and Michotte's (1946/1963) "launching effect" paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 294-301.
11. KERZEL, D. (2000). Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Vision Research, 40, 3703-3715.
12. KERZEL, D. (2003a). Centripetal force draws the eyes, not memory of the target, toward the center. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 458-466.
13. KERZEL, D. (2003b). Mental extrapolation of target position is strongest with weak motion signals and motor responses. Vision Research, 43, 2623-2635.
14. KERZEL, D. (2006). Why eye movements and perceptual factors have to be controlled in studies on "representational momentum." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 166-173.
15. MARR, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
16. MUNGER, M. P., & OWENS, T. R. (2004). Representational momentum and the flash-lag effect. Visual Cognition. 11, 81-103.
17. NIJHAWAN, R. (2002). Neural delays, visual motion and flash-lag effect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 387-393.
18. REED, C. L., & VINSON, N. G. (1996). Conceptual effects on representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 839-850.