Bridging the gap: A model of common neural mechanisms underlying the Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag effect, and the representational momentum effect

Space and Time in Perception and Action

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 422-440

  Jancke, Dirk ^a   Erlhagen, Wolfram ^b  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955555792     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511750540.025     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Abeles, M. (1991). Corticonics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Baldo, M. V. C., & Caticha, N. (2005). Computational neurobiology of the flash-lag effect. Vision Res 45: 2620-2630.
3. Baldo, M. V. C., & Klein, S. A. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shiftfl Nature 378: 565-566.
4. Ben-Yishai, R., Hansel, D., & Sompolinsky, H. (1997). Traveling waves and the processing of weakly tuned inputs in a cortical network module. J Comp Neurosci 4: 57-77.
5. Berry II, M. J., Brivanlou, I. H., Jordan, T. A., & Meister, M. (1999). Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature 398: 334-338.
6. Bringuier, V., Chavane, F., Glaeser, L., & Frégnac, Y. (1999). Horizontal propagation of visual activity in the synaptic integration fleld of area 17 neurons. Science 283: 695-699.
7. Coltheart, M. (1980). Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics 27: 183-228.
8. Dayan, P., & Abbott, L. F. (2001). Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Douglas, R. J., Koch, C., Mahowald, M., Martin, K. A. C., & Suarez, H. (1995). Recurrent excitation in neocortical circuits. Science 269: 981-985.
10. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287: 2036-2038.
11. Erlhagen, W. (2003). Internal models for visual perception. Biol Cybern 88: 409-417.
12. Erlhagen, W., Bastian, A., Jancke, D., Riehle, A., & Schöner, G. (1999). The distribution of neuronal population activation (DPA) as a tool to study interaction and integration in cortical representations. J Neurosci Methods 94: 53-66.
13. Erlhagen, W., & Jancke, D. (2004). The role of action plans and other cognitive factors in motion extrapolation: a modelling study. Vis Cogn 11(2 /3): 315-340.
14. Fitzpatrick, D. (2000). Seeing beyond the receptive fleld in primary visual cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10: 438-443.
15. Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. J Exp Psych Learn Mem Cogn 10: 126-132.
16. Fröhlich, F. W. (1923). Über die Messung der Empflndungszeit. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie 54: 58-78.
17. Fu, Y., Shen, Y., & Yang, D. (2001). Motion-induced perceptual extrapolation of blurred visual targets. J Neurosci 21 (RC172): 1-5.
18. Giese, M., & Xie, X. (2002). Exact solution of the nonlinear dynamics of recurrent neural mechanisms for direction selectivity. Neurocomp 44-46: 417-422.
19. Gilbert, S. D. (1995). Dynamic properties of adult visual cortex. In M. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (73-90). Cambridge: MIT Press.
20. Grinvald, A., Lieke, E., Frostig, R., & Hildesheim, R. (1994). Real-time optical imaging of naturally evoked electrical activity in intact frog brain. J Neurosci 14: 2545-2568.
21. Grossberg, S. (1988). Nonlinear neural networks: principles, mechanisms, and architectures. Neural Networks 1: 17-61.
22. Hahnloser, R., Douglas, R. J., Mahowald, M., & Hepp, K. (1999). Feedback interactions between neuronal pointers and maps for attentional processing. Nat Neurosci 2(8): 746-752.
23. Hubbard, T. L. (1990). Cognitive representation of linear motion: possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement. Memory & Cognition 18(3): 299-309.
24. Hubbard, T. L., & Bharucha, J. J. (1988). Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Perception & Psychophysics 44: 211-221.
25. Hubbard, T. L., & Motes, M. A. (2002). Does representational momentum reflect a distortion of the length or the endpoint of a trajectoryfl Cognition 82: B89-B99.
26. Jancke, D., Chavane, F., Naaman, S., & Grinvald, A. (2004a). Imaging correlates of visual illusion in early visual cortex. Nature 428: 423-426.
27. Jancke, D., Erlhagen, W., Dinse, H. R., Akhavan, A. C., Giese, M., Steinhage, A., et al. (1999). Parametric population representation of retinal location: neuronal interaction dynamics in cat primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 19: 9016-9028.
28. Jancke, D., Erlhagen, W., Schöner, G., & Dinse, H. R. (2004b). Shorter latencies for motion trajectories for flashes in population responses of cat visual cortex. J Physiol 556.3: 971-982.
29. Khurana, B., & Nijhawan, R. (1995). Extrapolation or attentional shiftfl Nature 378: 565-566.
30. Kirschfeld, K., & Kammer, T. (1999). The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vis Res 39: 3702-3709.
31. Kreegipuu, K., & Allik, J. (2003). Perceived onset time and position of a moving stimulus. Vision Res 43: 1625-1635.
32. Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2000). A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Res 40: 201-215.
33. Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2001). Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. TINS 24: 335-339.
34. Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. TINS 23: 571-579.
35. Lennie, P. (1981). The physiological basis of variations of visual latency. Vision Res. 21: 815-824.
36. Li, W., Pi¨ech, V., & Gilbert, C. D. (2004). Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 7(6): 651-657.
37. Maiche, A., Budelli, R., & Gómez-Sena, L. (2007). Spatial facilitation is involved in the flash-lag effect. Vision Res 47: 1655-1661.
38. Metzger, W. (1932). Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empflndungszeit. Psychologische Forschung 16: 176-200.
39. MÜsseler, J., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: The Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation. Perception & Psychophysics 60: 683-695.
40. MÜsseler, J., Stork, S., & Kerzel, D. (2002). Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli: The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag, and representational momentum. Vis Cog 9(1/2): 120-138.
41. Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370: 256-257.
42. Nijhawan, R., Watanabe, K., Khurana, B., & Shimojo, S. (2004). Compensation of neural delays in visual-motor behaviour: no evidence for shorter afferent delays for visual motion. Vis Cog 11(2/3): 275-298.
43. Purushothaman, G., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & ¨ Oflgmen, H. (1998). Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 396: 424.
44. Salinas, E., & Abbott, L. F. (1994). Vector reconstruction from flring rates. J Comput Neurosci 1: 89-107.
45. Thornton, I. M. (2002). The onset repulsion effect. Spatial Vision 15: 219-243.
46. Whitney, D. (2002). The influence of visual motion on perceived position. TICS 6: 211-216.
47. Whitney, D., Cavanagh, P., & Murakami, I. (2000). Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction. Vision Res 40: 3829-3839.
48. Whitney, D., Murakami, I., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Res 40: 137-149.
49. Wilson, H. R., & Cowan, J. D. (1973). A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue. Kybernetik (Biol Cybern) 13: 55-80.