The Fröhlich effect: Past and present

Space and Time in Perception and Action

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 321-337

  Kerzel, Dirk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859719312     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511750540.019     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Actis-Grosso, R., & Stucchi, N. (2003). Shifting the start: backward mislocation of the initial position of a motion. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29(3): 675-691.
2. Alpern, M. (1953). Metacontrast. J Opt Soc Am 43(8): 648-657.
3. Baldo, M. V., & Klein, S. A. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature 378(6557): 565-566.
4. Breitmeyer, B., & Ögmen, H. (2006). Visual Masking: Time Slices Through Conscious and Unconscious Vision. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Burr, D. (1980). Motion smear. Nature 284(5752): 164-165.
6. Cai, R. (2003). The Fröhlich effect is not due to a failure to perceive the beginning portion of motion trajectory. J Vis 3(9): 485.
7. Coltheart, M. (1980). Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics 27(3): 183-228.
8. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. J Exp Psychol Gen 129(4): 481-507.
9. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287(5460): 2036-2038.
10. Eriksen, C. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1987). Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: a critical look at the evidence. Perception & Psychophysics 42(3): 299-305.
11. Francis, G., & Hermens, F. (2002). Comment on –Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes— (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000). J Exp Psychol Gen 131(4): 590-593; discussion 594-596.
12. Fröhlich, F. W. (1923). ¨Uber die Messung der Emp?ndungszeit. [On the measurement of sensation time]. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie 54: 58-78.
13. Fröhlich, F. W. (1930). Über die Messung der Emp?ndungszeit. Eine Erwiderung auf experimenteller Grundlage [On the measurement of sensation time. An answer on an experimental basis]. Psychologische Forschung 13: 285-288.
14. Fröhlich, F. W. (1932). Bemerkungen zu G.E. Müllers Kritik der Emp?ndungszeitmessung [Remarks on the criticism of G. E. Müller of the measurement of sensation time]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane 62: 246-249.
15. Geer, M., & Schmidt, W. C. (2006). Perception of initial moving target signals: support for a cumulative lateral inhibition theory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32(5): 1185-1196.
16. Hubbard, T. L., & Motes, M. A. (2002). Does representational momentum re?ect a distortion of the length or the endpoint of a trajectory? Cognition 82(3): B89-99.
17. Hubbard, T. L., & Motes, M. A. (2005). An effect of context on whether memory for initial position exhibits a Fröhlich Effect or an Onset Repulsion Effect. Q J Exp Psychol 58A(6): 961-979.
18. Kerzel, D. (2002). Different localization of motion onset with pointing and relative judgements. Exp Brain Res 145(3): 340-350.
19. Kerzel, D. (2004). Attentional load modulates mislocalization of moving stimuli, but does not eliminate the error. Psychon Bull Rev 11(5): 848-853.
20. Kerzel, D., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2004). Spatial distortions and processing latencies in the onset repulsion and Fröhlich effects. Vision Res 44(6): 577-590.
21. Kerzel, D., & Müsseler, J. (2002). Effects of stimulus material on the Fröhlich illusion. Vision Res 42(2): 181-189.
22. Khurana, B., & Nijhawan, R. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shift. Nature 378(6557): 566.
23. Khurana, B., Watanabe, K., & Nijhawan, R. (2000). The role of attention in motion extrapolation: are moving objects –corrected— or flAshed objects attentionally delayed? Perception 29(6): 675-692.
24. Kirschfeld, K., & Kammer, T. (1999). The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Res 39: 3702-3709.
25. Kreegipuu, K., & Allik, J. (2003). Perceived onset time and position of a moving stimulus. Vision Res 43(15): 1625-1635.
26. MacKay, D. M. (1958). Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature 181(4607): 507-508.
27. Metzger, W. (1932). Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Emp?ndungszeit [An attempt at a common theory of Fröhlich's and Hazelhoff's phenomena and a critique of their procedure for measuring sensation time]. Psychologische Forschung 16: 176-200.
28. Müller, G. E. (1931). Erklärung der Erscheinungen eines mit konstanter Geschwindigkeit beewegten Lichtstreifens, insbesondere auch des Pihl-Fröhlichschen Phänomens [Explanation of the appearances of a lit bar moving at constant velocity, in particular the phenomenon of Pihl-Fröhlich]. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie 62: 167-202.
29. Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). reflExive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15(2): 315-330.
30. Müsseler, J., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: the Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation. Perception & Psychophysics 60(4): 683-695.
31. Müsseler, J., & Kerzel, D. (2004). The trial context determines adjusted localization of stimuli: reconciling the Fröhlich and Onset Repulsion Effects. Vision Res 44(19): 2201-2206.
32. Müsseler, J., & Neumann, O. (1992). Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): evidence for an attention-shifting model. Psychol Res 54(4): 246-266.
33. Müsseler, J., Stork, S., & Kerzel, D. (2002). Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli. The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag effect and representational momentum. Vis Cogn 9(1/2): 120-138.
34. Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370(6487): 256-257.
35. Nijhawan, R., Watanabe, K., Khurana, B., & Shimojo, S. (2004). Compensation of neural delays in visual-motor behaviour: no evidence for shorter afferent delays for visual motion. Vis Cogn 11(2/3): 275-298.
36. Pièron, H. (1935). Le processus du mètacontraste. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 32: 1-24.
37. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32(1): 3-25.
38. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (eds.), Attention and Performance X. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol 109(2): 160-174.
40. Purushothaman, G., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Ögmen, H. (1998). Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 396(6710): 424.
41. Remington, R., & Pierce, L. (1984). Moving attention: evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics 35(4): 393-399.
42. Rubin, E. (1930). Kritisches und Experimentelles zur –Emp?ndungszeit— Fröhlichs [Critical and experimental remarks on Fröhlich's "Sensation Time]. Psychologische Forschung 13(101-112).
43. Runeson, S. (1974). Constant velocity: not perceived as such. Psychol Res 37(1): 3-23.
44. Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: past, present, and future. Trends Cogn Sci 9(1): 16-20.
45. Stigler, R. (1910). Chronophotische Studien ¨uber den Umgebungskontrast. P?¨ugers Archiv f¨ur die gesamte Physiologie 134: 365-435.
46. Thornton, I. M. (2002). The onset repulsion effect. Spat Vis 15(2): 219-244.
47. Whitney, D., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). The position of moving objects. Science 289(5482): 1107a.
48. Whitney, D., & Cavanagh, P. (2002). Surrounding motion affects the perceived locations of moving stimuli. Vis Cogn 9(1/2): 139-152.
49. Whitney, D., & Murakami, I. (1998). Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nat Neurosci 1(8): 656-657