Bioimage informatics for understanding spatiotemporal dynamics of cellular processes

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 367-380

  Yang, Ge ^a,b,c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

B RAF KINASE; CYCLIC AMP; CYCLIC AMP DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; FLUORESCENT DYE; KINESIN 5; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; RHO GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ACTIVE TRANSPORT; BACTERIAL CELL; CELL DIVISION; CELL FUNCTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOSKELETON; EUKARYOTIC CELL; FLOW RATE; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INTRACELLULAR TRANSPORT; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NERVE CELL; NEURITE; PHOTOACTIVATION; PROKARYOTIC CELL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION;

ANIMALS; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FIBROBLASTS; FLUORESCENT DYES; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; T-LYMPHOCYTES; TUBULIN;

EID: 84876078880     PISSN: 19395094     EISSN: 1939005X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1214     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Robinson CV, Sali A, Baumeister W. The molecular sociology of the cell. Nature 2007, 450:973-982.
2. Zhou H-X, Rivas G, Minton AP. Macromolecular crowding and confinement: biochemical, biophysical, and potential physiological consequences. Annu Rev Biophy 2008, 37:375-397.
3. Scott JD, Pawson T. Cell signaling in space and time: where proteins come together and when they are apart. Science 2009, 326:1220-1224.
4. Wittmann T, Hyman A, Desai A. The spindle: a dynamic assembly of microtubules and motors. Nature Cell Biol 2001, 3:E28-E34.
5. Thanbichler M, Shapiro L. Getting organized: how bacterial cells move proteins and DNA. Nature Rev Microbiol 2008, 6:28-40.
6. Shapiro L, McAdams HH, Losick R. Why and how bacteria localize proteins. Science 2009, 326:1225-1228.
7. Khursigara CM, Wu X, Subramaniam S. Chemoreceptors in Caulobacter crescentus: trimers of receptor dimers in a partially ordered hexagonally packed array. J Bacteriol 2008, 190:6805-6810.
8. Laub MT, Shapiro L, McAdams HH. Systems biology of Caulobacter. Ann Rev Genet 2007, 41:429-441.
9. Vale RD. The molecular motor toolbox for intracellular transport. Cell 2003, 112:467-480.
10. Singleton KL, Roybal KT, Sun Y, Fu G, Gascoigne NRJ, van Oers NSC, Wulfing C. Spatiotemporal patterning during T cell activation is highly diverse. Sci Signal 2009, 2:ra15.
11. Machacek M, Hodgson L, Welch C, Elliott H, Pertz O, Nalbant P, Abell A, Johnson GL, Hahn KM, Danuser G. Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion. Nature 2009, 461:99-103.
12. Gable A, Qiu M, Titus J, Balchand S, Ferenz NP, Ma N, Collins ES, Fagerstrom S, Ross JL, Yang G, et al. Dynamic reorganization of Eg5 in the mammalian spindle throughout mitosis requires dynein and TPX2. Mol Biol Cell 2012, 23:1254-1266.
13. Hell SW. Microscopy and its focal switch. Nature Meth 2009, 6:24-32.
14. Huang B, Bates M, Zhuang X. Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. Ann Rev Biochem 2009, 78:993-1016.
15. Patterson G, Davidson M, Manley S, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Superresolution imaging using single-molecule localization. Ann Rev of Phys Chem 2010, 61:345-367.
16. Selvin P, Ha T. Single-Molecule Techniques. 1st ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2007.
17. Giepmans BNG, Adams SR, Ellisman MH, Tsien RY. The fluorescent toolbox for assessing protein location and function. Science 2006, 312:217-224.
18. Welch CM, Ellitt H, Danuser G, Hahn KM. Imaging the coordination of multiple signaling activities in living cells. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011, 12:749-756.
19. Peng H. Bioimage informatics: a new area of engineering biology. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1827-1836.
20. Swedlow JR, Goldberg IG, Eliceiri KW. Bioimage informatics for experimental biology. Ann Rev Biophys 2009, 38:327-346.
21. Pepperkok R, Ellenberg J. High-throughput fluorescence microscopy for systems biology. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006, 7:690-696.
22. Danuser G. Computer vision in cell biology. Cell 2011, 147:973-978.
23. Dorn JF, Danuser G, Yang G. Computational processing and analysis of dynamic fluorescence image data. In: Methods in Cell Biology. San Diego, California: Academic Press; 2008, 497-538.
24. Szeliski R. Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications. London, UK: Springer; 2010.
25. Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R. Image Processing, Analysis, and Machine Vision. 3rd ed. Toronto, Ontario: Thomson Learning; 2007.
26. Zitova B, Flusser J. Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vision Comput 2003, 21:977-1000.
27. Nixon M, Aguado A. Feature Extraction & Image Processing. 2nd ed. San Diego, California: Academic Press; 2008.
28. Meijering E, Smal I, Danuser G. Tracking in biomolecular imaging. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2006, 23: 46-53.
29. Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. 3rd ed. San Francisco, California: Morgan Kaufmann; 2011.
30. Waterman-Storer CM, Salmon ED. How microtubules get fluorescent speckles. Biophys J 1998, 75:2059-2069.
31. Danuser G, Waterman-Storer CM. Quantitative fluorescent speckle microscopy of cytoskeleton dynamics. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2006, 35:361-387.
32. Lippincott-Schwartz J, Snapp E, Kenworthy A. Studying protein dynamics in living cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001, 2:444-456.
33. Dhawan AP. Medical Image Analysis. 2nd ed. IEEE Press Series on Biomedical Engineering. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-IEEE Press; 2011.
34. Christensen HI, Philips PJ, eds. Empirical Evaluation Methods in Computer Vision. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing; 2002.
35. Cheezum MK, Walker WF, Guilford WH. Quantitative comparison of algorithms for tracking single fluorescent particles. Biophys J 2001, 81:2378-2388.
36. Saxton MJ, Jacobson K. Single-particle tracking: applications to membrane dynamics. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1997, 26:373-399.
37. Saxton MJ. Single-particle tracking: connecting the dots. Nature Meth 2008, 5:671-672.
38. Meijering E, Dzyubachyk O, Smal I, van Cappellen WA. Tracking in cell and developmental biology. Sem Cell Dev Biol 2009, 20:894-902.
39. Weinger JS, Qiu M, Yang G, Kapoor TM. A nonmotor microtubule binding site in kinesin-5 is required for filament crosslinking and sliding. Curr Biol 2011, 21:154-160.
40. Yildiz A, Selvin PR. Fluorescence imaging with one nanometer accuracy: application to molecular motors. Acc Chem Res 2005, 38:574-582.
41. Veenman CJ, Reinders MJT, Backer E. Resolving motion correspondence for densely moving points. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2001, 23:54-72.
42. Cox I. A review of statistical data association techniques for motion correspondence. Int J Comp Vision 1993, 10:53-66.
43. Mukherjee A, Jenkins B, Fang C, Radke RJ, Banker G, Roysam B. Automated kymograph analysis for profiling axonal transport of secretory granules. Med Image Anal 2011, 15:354-367.
44. Padfield D, Rittscher J, Roysam B. Coupled minimum-cost flow cell tracking for high-throughput quantitative analysis. Med Image Anal 2011, 15:650-668.
45. Blackman S, Popoli R. Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking Systems. Norwood, MA: Artech House; 1999.
46. Jaqaman K, Loerke D, Mettlen M, Kuwata H, Grinstein S, Schmid S, Danuser G. Robust single-particle tracking in live-cell time-lapse sequences. Nat Meth 2008, 5:695-702.
47. Li K, Miller ED, Chen M, Kanade T, Weiss LE, Campbell PG. Cell population tracking and lineage construction with spatiotemporal context. Med Image Anal 2008, 12:546-566.
48. Meijering E, Dzyubachyk O, Smal I. Methods for cell and particle tracking. Meth Enzymol 2012, 504:183-200.
49. Saxton MJ. Modeling 2D and 3D diffusion. Meth Mol Biol 2007, 400:295-321.
50. Qian H, Sheetz MP, Elson EL. Single particle tracking: analysis of diffusion and flow in two-dimensional systems. Biophys J 1991, 60:910-921.
51. Reis GF, Yang G, Szpankowski L, Weaver C, Shah SB, Robinson JT, Hays TS, Danuser G, Goldstein LS. Molecular motor function in axonal transport in vivo probed by genetic and computational analysis in Drosophila. Mol Biol Cell 2012, 23:1700-1714.
52. Yang G, Houghtaling BR, Gaetz J, Liu JZ, Danuser G, Kapoor TM. Architectural dynamics of the meiotic spindle revealed by single-fluorophore imaging. Nature Cell Biol 2007, 9:1233-1242.
53. Yang G, Cameron LA, Maddox PS, Salmon ED, Danuser G. Regional variation of microtubule flux reveals microtubule organization in the metaphase meiotic spindle. J Cell Biol 2008, 182:631-639.
54. Das R, Cairo CW, Coombs D. A hidden Markov model for single particle tracks quantifies dynamic interactions between LFA-1 and the actin cytoskeleton. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5:e1000556.
55. Rabiner LR. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc IEEE 1989, 77:257-286.
56. Fraley C, Raftery AE. Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis and density estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 2002, 97:611-631.
57. Diggle PJ. Spatio-temporal point processes: methods and applications. In: Statistical Methods for Spatio-Temporal Systems. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2007, 1-45.
58. Illian J, Penttinen A, Stoyan H, Stoyan D. Statistical Analysis and Modeling of Spatial Point Patterns. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Interscience; 2008.
59. Cressie N, Wikle CK. Statistics for Spatio-Temporal Data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2011.
60. Maresca TJ, Heald R. Methods for studying spindle assembly and chromosome condensation in Xenopus egg extracts. Meth Mol Biol 2006, 322:459-474.
61. Hadjidemetriou S, Toomre D, Duncan J. Motion tracking of the outer tips of microtubules. Med Image Anal 2008, 12:689-702.
62. Kapoor TM, Mitchison TJ. Eg5 is static in bipolar spindles relative to tubulin. J Cell Biol 2001, 154:1125-1134.
63. Uteng M, Hentrich C, Miura K, Bieling P, Surrey T. Poleward transport of Eg5 by dynein/dynactin in Xenopus laevis egg extract spindles. J Cell Biol 2008, 182:715-726.
64. Ji L, Danuser G. Tracking quasi-stationary flow of weak fluorescent signals by adaptive multi-frame correlation. J Microsc 2005, 220:150-167.
65. Ye M, Haralick RM, Shapiro LG. Estimating piecewise-smooth optical flow with global matching and graduated optimization. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2003, 25:1625-1630.
66. Boulanger J, Kervrann C, Bouthemy P. Space-time adaptation for patch-based image sequence restoration. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2007, 29:1096-1102.
67. Wilson CA, Tsuchida MA, Allen GM, Barnhart EL, Applegate KT, Yam PT, Ji L, Keren K, Danuser G, Theriot JA. Myosin II contributes to cell-scale actin network treadmilling through network disassembly. Nature 2010, 465:373-377.
68. Neves SR, Tsokas P, Sarkar A, Grace EA, Rangamani P, Taubenfeld SM, Alberini CM, Schaff JC, Blitzer RD, Moraru II, et al. Cell shape and negative links in regulatory motifs together control spatial information flow in signaling networks. Cell 2008, 133:666-680.
69. Machacek M, Danuser G. Morphodynamic profiling of protrusion phenotypes. Biophys J 2006, 90:1439-1452.
70. Jaffe AB, Hall A. Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol 2005, 21:247-269.
71. Ridley AJ, Schwartz MA, Burridge K, Firtel RA, Ginsberg MH, Borisy G, Parsons JT, Horwitz AR. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 2003, 302:1704-1709.
72. Vilela M, Danuser G. What's wrong with correlative experiments? Nature Cell Biol 2011, 13:1011-1011.
73. Granger CWJ. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969, 37:424-438.
74. Dryden IL, Mardia KV. Statistical Shape Analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
75. Pelkmans L. Using cell-to-cell variability: a new era in molecular biology. Science 2012, 336:425-426.
76. Andrews SS, Bray D. Stochastic simulation of chemical reactions with spatial resolution and single molecule detail. Phys Biol 2004, 1:137-151.
77. Andrews SS, Addy NJ, Brent R, Arkin AP. Detailed simulations of cell biology with Smoldyn 2.1. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000705.
78. Boulanger J, Kervrann C, Bouthemy P. A simulation and estimation framework for intracellular dynamics and trafficking in video-microscopy and fluorescence imagery. Med Image Anal 2009, 13:132-142.
79. Lichtman JW, Conchello J-A. Fluorescence microscopy. Nature Meth 2005, 2:910-919.
80. Stephens DJ, Allan VJ. Light microscopy techniques for live cell imaging. Science 2003, 300:82-86.
81. Chang HY. Anatomic demarcation of cells: genes to patterns. Science 2009, 326:1206-1207.
82. Holt CE, Bullock SL. Subcellular mRNA localization in animal cells and why it matters. Science 2009, 326:1212-1216.
83. McAdams HH, Shapiro L. A bacterial cell-cycle regulatory network operating in time and space. Science 2003, 301:1874-1877.
84. Shapiro L, Losick R. Dynamic spatial regulation in the bacterial cell. Cell 2000, 100:89-98.
85. 19-22.
86. Detailed descriptions of bioimage informatics techniques introduced in this review can be found in the references provided. Although currently there are no specialized books on bioimage informatics, related technical background can be found in the references given below.
87. A general introduction to bioimage informatics can be found in Refs 19-22. A detailed introduction to computational techniques for analyzing dynamic fluorescence images can be found in Ref 23.
88. A general introduction to fluorescence imaging techniques can be found in Refs 79 and 80. Superresolution imaging techniques were reviewed in Refs 13-15.
89. A focused treatment of biological image analysis techniques is given in the edited volume: Rittscher J, Machiraju R, Wong STC. Microscopy Image Analysis for Life Science Applications. Artech House Publishers; 2008.
90. Many image analysis techniques used in bioimage informatics were initially developed for computer vision and medical image analysis applications. There are many excellent references on computer vision techniques, including Refs 24, 25, and 33.
91. 3, 6, 81, 82. Systems-level analysis of spatiotemporal dynamics of bacterial cellular processes was reviewed in Refs 8, 83 and 84. Stochastic computer simulation of spatiotemporal cell dynamics was introduced in Refs 76 and 77.
92. Up-to-date information on latest bioimage informatics research can be found in proceedings of related conference. Some of these conferences are listed at: http://www.bioimageinformatics.org/ and http://www.biomedicalimaging.org.