Ubiquitous writing: Writing technologies for situated mediation and proactive assessment

Ubiquitous Learning

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 173-188

  Kumar, Vive ^a   Chang, Maiga ^a   Leacock, Tracey ^a  

^a ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Mixed Initiative Interactions; Mobile Technologies; Model Tracing; Situated Writing; Ubiquitous Writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875998238     PISSN: 18359795     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18848/1835-9795/cgp/v03i03/40289     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allen J. F, (1999). Mixed-initiative interaction, IEEE Intelli gent Systems, September, 14-16.
2. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25 (4), 5-11.
3. Ball, A. F. (2006). Teaching writing in culturally diverse classrooms. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 292-310). New York: Guilford.
4. Boscolo, P. Arfé, B. & Quarisa M. (2007). Improving the quality of students' academic writing: An intervention study. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 419-438. doi: 10.1080/03075070701476092
5. Burk, A. L. (2006), Do the write thing. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2006 (109), 79-89. doi: 10.1002/ace.210
6. Carroll, L. A. (2002). Rehearsing New Roles: How College Students Develop as Writers. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
7. Chang, A., & Chang, M. (2006). A treasure hunting learning model for students studying history and culture in the field with cellphone. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, (ICALT 2006), (pp. 106-108). doi: 10.1109/ICALT. 2006.37
8. Cho, K., Chung, T. R., King, W. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement: An empirical investigation. Communications of the ACM, 51 (3), 83-88. doi: 10.1145/1325555.1325571
9. Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48, 409-426. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
10. Cummings, R. E., Barton, M. (Eds.) (2008). Wiki writing: Collaborative learning in the college classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
11. Defazio, J. Jones, J. Tennant, F. & Hook, S. A. (2010). Academic literacy: The importance and impact of writing across the curriculum-a case study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10 (2)34-47.
12. DeGroff, L.C. (1987). The influence of prior knowledge on writing, conferencing, and revising. Elementary School Journal, 88, 107-120).
13. Dringus, L. P. & Ellis, T. (2005). Using data mining as a strategy for assessing asynchronous discussion forums. Computers & Education, 45, 141-160.
14. Duke, C. R., & Sanchez, R. (Eds.). (2001). Writing Across the Curriculum. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
15. Flower, L. & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
16. Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37, 16-55.
17. Gilmore, B. (2007). Is it done yet? Teaching adolescents the art of revision. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
18. Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187-207). New York: Guilford.
19. Guinn C. I. (1999, September). Evaluating mixed-initiative dialog. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21-23.
20. Hadwin, A. F., Winne, P. H., Nesbit, J.C., & Kumar, V. (2005, April). Tracing self-regulated learning in the l earning k i t. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, QC, Canada.
21. Hattie J., Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112, doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
22. Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In M. C. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Hayes, J. R. (2004). What triggers revision? In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Vol. Eds.), Studies in writing, Vol. 13: Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 9-20). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
24. Hayes, J. R., & Bajzek, D. M. (2007). An online tool to improve writers' judgment about their audience. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.). Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007 (pp. 4084-4088). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
25. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of the writing processes. In Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Horkoff, H. & Kayes, J. M. (2008). Language l earning by iPod: An e merging m odel. The MASIE Center. Retrieved from http://www.masie.com/Research-Articles/language-learning-by-ipodan-emerging-model.htm
27. Jucks R., Bromme, R., Schulte-Löbbert, P. (2007, July), The concept revision tool: Promoting students' learning through reflection. Paper presented at the 4th international conference of the European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing. Bochum, Germany.
28. Keegan, D. (2002). The future of learning: From eLearning to mLearning. Fern University. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED472435.pdf
29. Klein, P. D., & Leacock, T. L. (in press). Distributed cognition as a framework for understanding writing. In V. Berninger (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology: Psychology Press/Taylor Francis.
30. Korbel, T. M. (2001). Stren gthening student writing skills (Master's thesis). Saint Xavier University, Chicago, IL, USA.
31. Leacock, T. L. (2007). Exploring student perceptions of the role of revision: an investigation into technological scaffolds for academic writing. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007 (pp. 2871-2876). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
32. Leacock, T. L., Winne, P. H., Kumar, V., & Shakya, J. (2006). Using technology to support self-regulation in university writing. Proceedings of IEEE 6th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, (ICALT 2006), 1073-1075. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2006.347
33. Melzer, D. (2009). Writing assignments across the curriculum: A national study of college writing. College Composition and Communication, 61, W240-W261.
34. Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 37, 375-401. doi: 10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x
35. Onishi, N. (2008, January 20). Thumbs Race as Japan's Best Sellers Go Cellular. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/world/asia/20japan.html?_r=2
36. Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. (1995). Effects of speech synthesis on the proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with learning disabilities, Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 141-158.
37. Salahu-Din, D., Persky, H., & Miller, J. (2008). The nation's report card: Writing 2007 (NCES 2008-468). Retrieved from National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education website: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo. asp?pubid=2008468
38. Scarcella, R. (2003). Accelerating academic English: A focus on the English learner. Retrieved from the University of California website: http://exstream.ucsd.edu/UCPDI/webtool/html/publications/ell_book_all.pdf
39. Stein, S. (2000). Equipped for the future content standards: What adults need to know and be able to do in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
40. Thornton, P. & Houser, C. (2004). Using mobile phones in education. In J. Roschelle, T-W. Chan, Kinshuk, & S.J.H. Yang (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE 2004), (pp. 3-10). doi: 10.1109/WMTE.2004.1281326
41. Tremblay, E. (2010). Educating the mobile generation-Using personal cell phones as audience response systems in post-secondary science teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 29, 217-227.
42. Venkatesh, V., Wozney, L., & Hadwin, A. F. (2003, August). Exploring graduate learners ' monitoring and task understandings in writing tasks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, ON, Canada.
43. Wallace, D. L., Hayes, J. R., Hatch, J. A., Miller, W., Moser, G., & Silk, C. M. (1996). Better revision in eight minutes? Prompting first-year college writers to revise globally. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 682-688.
44. Warschauer, M., & Ware, M. (2008). Learning, change, and power: Competing discourses of technology and literacy. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J Leu (Eds.) Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 215-240). New York: Erlbaum.
45. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed, pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Winne, P. H. (2006). How software technologies can improve research on learning and bolster school reform. Educational Psychologist, 41, 5-17.
47. Wu, S., Chang, A., Chang, M., Yen, Y.-R., & Heh, J.-S. (2010). Learning historical and cultural contents via mobile treasure hunting in Five-Harbor District of Tainan. In U. Hoppe, R. Pea, & C-C. Liu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiqui tous Technologies in Education (WMUTE 2010), Kaohsiung (pp. 213-215) Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
48. Zamel, V. (1983). The composing process of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165-187.
49. Zellermayer, M., Salomon, G., Globerson, T., Givon, H., (1991), Enhancing writing-related metacognitions through a computerized writing partner, American E ducational Research Journal, 28, 373-391.
50. Zhou, M., & Winne, P. H. (2009). Designing multimedia to trace goal-setting in studying. In R. Zheng (Ed.). Cognitive effects of multimedia learning (pp. 288-311). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.