Impact of an acid fungal protease in high gravity fermentation for ethanol production using indian sorghum as a feedstock

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 329-336

  Gohel, V ^a   Duan, G ^b   Maisuria, V B ^a  

^a DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

^b Grain Processing   (China)

Author keywords

Acid fungal protease; Ethanol; Fermentable sugars; Indian sorghum; Liquefaction; Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation; Urea

Indexed keywords

ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL PRODUCTIVITY; FERMENTABLE SUGARS; FERMENTATION EFFICIENCY; FERMENTATION TIME; INDIAN SORGHUM; LIQUEFACTION PROCESS; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION;

ETHANOL; FEEDSTOCKS; LIQUEFACTION; METABOLISM; SUGARS; UREA; YEAST;

FERMENTATION;

ALCOHOL; AMYLASE; BIOFUEL; FUNGAL PROTEIN; PEPTIDE HYDROLASE;

ARTICLE; BIOCATALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; EVALUATION; FERMENTATION; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; SORGHUM; YEAST;

ALPHA-AMYLASES; BIOCATALYSIS; BIOFUELS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL PROTEINS; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; PEPTIDE HYDROLASES; SORGHUM; YEASTS;

EID: 84875960399     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1679     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Dale B. Biofuels: thinking clearly about the issues. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56:3885-3891.
2. Hansen A, Zhang CQ, Lyne PWL. Ethanol diesel fuel blends-a review. Bioresource Technol. 2005;96:277-285.
3. Faaij APC. Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices. Energy Policy. 2006;34:322-342.
4. Klass DL, Emert, GH. Fuels from Biomass and Wastes, Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science, The Butterworth Group; 1981.
5. Sánchez OJ, Cardona, CA. Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresource Technol. 2008;99:5270-5295.
6. Kleih U, Ravi SB, Rao BD, Yoganand B. Industrial utilization of sorghum in India. SAT eJ. 2007;3:1-37.
7. Gohel V, Duan G. Conventional process for ethanol production from Indian broken rice and pearl millet. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2012;35:1297-1308.
8. Li S-Z, Catherine C-H. Ethanol production in (the) People's Republic of China: potential and technologies. Appl Energy. 2009;86:S162-S169.
9. Tiwale S. Food grain vs liquor: Maharashtra under crisis. Econ Polit Wkly. 2010;14:19-21.
10. Karuppiah R, Peschel A, Martin M, Grossmann IE, Martinson W, Zullo L. Energy optimization for the design of corn-based ethanol plants. AIChE J. 2008;54:1499-1525.
11. Suresh K, Sree NK, Rao LV. Utilization of damaged sorghum and rice grains for ethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Bioresource Technol. 1999;68:301-304.
12. Gopinathan MC, Sudhakaran R. Biofuels: opportunities and challenges in India. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2009;45:350-371.
13. Nikolić S, Mojović L, Rakin M, Pejin D, Pejin J. Ultrasound-assisted production of bioethanol by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of corn meal. Food Chem. 2010;122:216-222.
14. Bely M, Rinaldi A, Dubourdieu D. Influence of assimilable nitrogen on volatile acidity production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during high sugar fermentation. J Biosci Bioeng. 2003;96:507-512.
15. Breisha GZ. Production of 16% ethanol from 35% sucrose. Biomass Bioenergy. 2010;34:1243-1249.
16. Bisson LV, Butzke CE. Diagnosis and rectification of stuck and sluggish fermentation. Am J Enol Viticult. 2000;51:168-177.
17. Beltran G, Esteve-Zarzoso B, Rozes N, Mas A, Guillamoan, J M. Influence of the timing of nitrogen additions during synthetic grape must fermentations on fermentation kinetics and nitrogen consumption. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:996-1002.
18. ter Schure EG, Van Riel NAW, Verrips CT. The role of ammonia metabolism in nitrogen catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000;24:67-83.
19. Bvochora JM, Read JS, Zvauya R. Application of very high gravity technology to the cofermentation of sweet stem sorghum juice and sorghum grain. Ind Crop Prod. 2000;11:11-17.
20. Garrett JM. Amino acid transport through the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gap1 permease is controlled by the Ras/cAMP pathway. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40:496-502.
21. Alexandre H, Charpentier C. Biochemical aspects of stuck and sluggish fermentation in grape must. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998;20:20-27.
22. Busturia A, Lagunas R. Catabolite inactivation of the glucose transport system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Gen Microbiol. 1986;132:379-385.
23. Jimènez-Mart E, Aranda A, Mendes-Ferreira A, Mendes-Faia A, del Olmo M. The nature of the nitrogen source added to nitrogen depleted vinifications conducted by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain in synthetic must affects gene expression and the levels of several volatile compounds. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 2007;92:61-75.
24. Guo ZP, Zhang L, Ding ZY, Wang ZX, Shi GY. Improving the performance of industrial ethanol-producing yeast by expressing the aspartyl protease on the cell surface. Yeast. 2010;27:1017-1027.
25. Kitamoto K, Oda K, Gomi K, Takahashi K. Genetic engineering of a sake yeast producing no urea by successive disruption of arginase gene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57:306-306.
26. Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY, Mitchinson C, Saddler JN. Comparative sugar recovery and fermentation data following pretreatment of poplar wood by leading technologies. Biotechnol Prog. 2009;25:333-339.
27. Pretorius IS. Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast. 2000;16:675-729.
28. Gohel V, Duan, G. No-cook process for ethanol production using Indian broken rice and pearl millet. Int J Microbiol. 2012;2012:1-9.
29. Schäfer T, Kirk O, Borchert TV, Fuglsang CC, Pedersen S, Salmon S, Olsen HS, Deinhammer R, Lund H. Enzymes for technical applications. Biopolymer Online. 2005.
30. Wang P, Singh V, Xue H, Johnston DB, Rausch KD, Tumbleson ME. Comparison of raw starch hydrolyzing enzyme with conventional liquefaction and saccharification enzymes in dry-grind corn processing. Cereal Chem. 2007;84:10-14.
31. Shanavas S, Padmaja G, Moorthy SN, Sajeev MS, Sheriff JT. Process optimization for bioethanol production from cassava starch using novel eco-friendly enzymes. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35:901-909.
32. Roy I, Gupta MN. Hydrolysis of starch by a mixture of glucoamylase and pullulanase entrapped individually in calcium alginate beads. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2004;34:26-32.
33. Gantelet H, Duchiron F. A new pullulanase from a hyperthermophilic archaeon for starch hydrolysis. Biotechnol Lett. 1999;21:71-75.
34. Swinnen IA, Bernaerts MK, Dens EJJ, Geeraerd AH, VanImpe JF. Predictive modeling of the microbial lag phase: a review. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;94:137-159.
35. Gohel V, Megha C, Vyas P, Chhatpar HS. Strain improvement of chitinase producing isolate Pantoea dispersa for enhancing its biocontrol potential against fungal plant pathogens. Ann Microbiol. 2004;54:503-515.
36. Barcelos CA, Maeda RN, Betancur GJV, Pereira N Jr. Ethanol production from sorghum grains [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]: evaluation of the enzymatic hydrolysis and the hydrolysate fermentability. Braz J Chem Eng. 2011;28:597-604.
37. Spayd SE, Andersen-Bagge J. Free amino acid composition of grape juice from 12 Vitis vinifera cultivars in Washington. Am J Enol Vitic. 47;1996:389-402.
38. Thomas KC, Ingledew WM, Fuel alcohol production: effects of free amino nitrogen on fermentation of very-high-gravity wheat mashes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1990;56:2046-2050.
39. Albers E, Larsson C, Lidén G, Niklasson C, Gustafsson L. Influence of the nitrogen source on Saccharomyces cerevisiae anaerobic growth and product formation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:3187-3195.
40. Zhan X, Wang D, Bean SR, Mo X, Sun XS, Boyl D. Ethanol production from supercritical-fluid-extrusion cooked sorghum. Ind Crops Prod. 23;2006:304-310.