Computational study of particle size effects on selective binding of nanoparticles in arterial stenosis

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 417-424

  Jeong, Woowon ^a   Kim, Moon June ^a   Rhee, Kyehan ^a  

^a Myong Ji University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Binding selectivity; Computational fluid dynamics; Drug delivery; Nanoparticle; Wall shear stress

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL STENOSIS; BINDING SELECTIVITY; COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES; NEGATIVE CORRELATION; PARTICLE SIZE EFFECT; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; SMALL SIZE PARTICLES; WALL SHEAR STRESS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DRUG DELIVERY; PARTICLE SIZE; RATE CONSTANTS; SHEAR DEFORMATION; SHEAR FLOW;

NANOPARTICLES;

NANOPARTICLE;

ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADHESIVENESS; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; HEMORHEOLOGY; HUMANS; KINETICS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLE SIZE; VASCULAR DISEASES;

EID: 84875923541     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: 18790534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Whitesides G.M. The 'right' size in nanobiotechnology. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21:1161-1165.
2. Nam J.M., Thaxton C.S., Mirkin C.A. Nanoparticle-based bio-bar codes for the ultrasensitive detection of proteins. Science 2003, 301:1884-1886.
3. Tsapis N., Bennett D., Jackson B., Weitz D.A., Edwards D.A. Trojan particles: large porous carriers of nanoparticles for drug delivery. PNAS 2002, 99:12001-12005.
4. Gao X., Nie S. Molecular profiling of single cells and tissue specimens with quantum dots. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21:371-373.
5. Huber M.M., Staubli A.B., Kustedjo K., Gray M.H.B., Shih J., Fraser S.E., Jacobs R.E., Meade T.J. Fluorescently detectable magnetic resonance imaging agents. Bioconjugate Chem. 1998, 9:242-249.
6. Kircher M.F., Weissleder R., Josephson L. A dual fluorochrome probe for imaging proteases. Bioconjugate Chem. 2004, 15:242-248.
7. Muro S., Dziubla T., Qiu W., Leferovich J., Cui X., Berk E., Muzykantov V.R. Endothelial targeting of high-affinity multivalent polymer nanocarriers directed to intercellular adhesion molecule 1. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006, 317:1161-1169.
8. Wu Y., Xiang J., Yang C., Lu W., Lieber C.M. Single-crystal metallic nanowires and metal/semiconductor nanowire heterostructures. Nature 2004, 430:61-65.
9. Kelly K.A., Nahrendorf M., Yu A.M., Reynolds F., Weissleder R. In vivo phage display selection yields atherosclerotic plaque targeted peptides for imaging. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2006, 8:201-207.
10. Weissleder R., Kelly K., Sun E.Y., Shtatland T., Josephson L. Cell-specific targeting of nanoparticles by multivalent attachment of small molecules. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23:1418-1423.
11. Patil V.R.S., Campbell C.J., Yun Y.H., Slack S.M., Goetz D.J. Particle diameter influences adhesion under flow. Biophys. J. 2001, 80:1733-1743.
12. Dickerson J.B., Blackwell J.E., Ou J.J., Shinde Patil V.R., Goetz D.J. Limited adhesion of biodegradable microspheres to E- and P-selectin under flow. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 73:500-509.
13. Kiani M.F., Yuan H., Chen X., Smith L., Gaber M.W., Goetz D.J. Targeting microparticles to select tissue via radiation-induced upregulation of endothelial cell adhesion molecules. Pharm. Res. 2002, 19:1317-1322.
14. Yago T., Wu J., Wey C.D., Klopocki A.G., Zhu C., McEver R.P. Catch bonds govern adhesion through L-selectin at threshold shear. J. Cell. Biol. 2004, 166:913-923.
15. Cozens-Roberts C., Quinn J.A., Lauffenberger D.A. Receptor-mediated adhesion phenomena. Model studies with the Radical-Flow Detachment Assay. Biophys. J. 1990, 58:107-125.
16. Worth Longest P., Kleinstreuer C. Comparison of blood particle deposition models for non-parallel flow domains. J. Biomech. 2003, 36:421-430.
17. Chang K.C., Hammer D.A. The forward rate of binding of surface-tethered reactants: effect of relative motion between two surfaces. Biophys. J. 1999, 76:1280-1292.
18. Gaver Iii D.P., Kute S.M. A theoretical model study of the influence of fluid stresses on a cell adhering to a microchannel wall. Biophys. J. 1998, 75:721-733.
19. King M.R., Hammer D.A. Multiparticle adhesive dynamics: hydrodynamic recruitment of rolling leukocytes. PNAS 2001, 98:14919-14924.
20. Simon S.I., Goldsmith H.L. Leukocyte adhesion dynamics in shear flow. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2002, 30:315-332.
21. Tees D.F.J., Goetz D.J. Leukocyte adhesion: an exquisite balance of hydrodynamic and molecular forces. News. Physiol. Sci. 2003, 18:186-190.
22. Hinds M.T., Park Y.J., Jones S.A., Giddens D.P., Rita Alevriadou B. Local hemodynamics affect monocytic cell adhesion to a three-dimensional flow model coated with E-selectin. J. Biomech. 2001, 34:95-103.
23. Kim M.C., Nam J.H., Lee C.S. Near-wall deposition probability of blood elements as a new hemodynamic wall parameter. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2006, 34:958-970.
24. Lyczkowski R.W., Alevriadou B.R., Horner M., Panchal C.B., Shroff S.G. Application of multiphase computational fluid dynamics to analyze monocyte adhesion. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 37:1516-1533.
25. Decuzzi P., Lee S., Decuzzi M., Ferrari M. Adhesion of microfabricated particles on vascular endothelium: a parametric analysis. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2004, 32:793-802.
26. Decuzzi P., Ferrari M. The adhesive strength of non-spherical particles mediated by specific interactions. Biomaterials 2006, 27:5307-5314.
27. Decuzzi P., Gentile F., Granaldi A., Curcio A., Causa F., Indolfi C., Netti P., Ferrari M. Flow chamber analysis of size effects in the adhesion of spherical particles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2007, 2:689-696.
28. Mennesson E., Erbacher P., Kuzak M., Kieda C., Midoux P., Pichon C. DNA/cationic polymer complex attachment on a human vascular endothelial cell monolayer exposed to a steady laminar flow. J. Controlled Release 2006, 114:389-397.
29. Harris S.S., Giorgio T.D. Convective flow increases lipoplex delivery rate to in vitro cellular monolayers. Gene Therapy 2005, 12:512-520.
30. Haun J.B., Hammer D.A. Quantifying nanoparticle adhesion mediated by specific molecular interactions. Langmuir 2008, 24:8821-8832.
31. Haun J.B., Robbins G.P., Hammer D.A. Engineering therapeutic nanocarriers with optimal adhesion for targeting. J. Adhes. 2010, 86:131-159.
32. Charoenphol P., Huang R.B., Eniola-Adefeso O. Potential role of size and hemodynamics in the efficacy of vascular-targeted spherical drug carriers. Biomaterials 2010, 31:1392-1402.
33. Kim M.J., Rhee K. Computational analysis of nanoparticle adhesion to endothelium: effects of kinetic rate constants and wall shear rates. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2011, 49:733-741.
34. David T., Thomas S., Walker P.G. Platelet deposition in stagnation point flow: an analytical and computational simulation. Med. Eng. Phys. 2001, 23:299-312.
35. Turitto V.T., Baumgartner H.R. Platelet interaction with subendothelium in a perfusion system: physical role of red blood cells. Microvasc. Res. 1975, 9:335-344.
36. Munn L.L., Melder R.J., Jain R.K. Role of erythrocytes in leukocyte-endothelial interactions: mathematical model and experimental validation. Biophys. J. 1996, 71:466-478.
37. Young D.F. Effect of a time-dependent stenosis on flow through a tube. ASME 1967, 90:248-254.
38. S. Jin, Y. Yang, J. Oshinski, A. Tannenbaum, J. Gruden, D. Giddens, Flow pattern and wall shear stress distributions at atherosclerotic-prone sites in human left coronary artery-An exploration using combined methods of CT and computational fluid dynamics, in: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, 2004, pp. 3789-3791.
39. Cho Y.I., Kensey K.R. Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel. Part 1: steady flows. Biorheology 1991, 28:241-262.
40. Ku D.N., Giddens D.P., Zarins C.K., Glagov S. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1985, 5:293-302.
41. Dai G., Kaazempur-Mofrad M.R., Natarajan S., Zhang Y., Vaughn S., Blackman B.R., Kamm R.D., Garcia-Cardena G., Gimbrone M.A. Distinct endothelial phenotypes evoked by arterial waveforms derived from atherosclerosis-susceptible and-resistant regions of human vasculature. PNAS 2004, 101:14871-14876.
42. He X., Ku D.N. Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions. J. Biomech. Eng. 1996, 118:74-82.
43. Chappell D.C., Varner S.E., Nerem R.M., Medford R.M., Alexander R.W. Oscillatory shear stress stimulates adhesion molecule expression in cultured human endothelium. Circ. Res. 1998, 82:532-539.
44. Lee S.W., Antiga L., Spence J.D., Steinman D.A. Geometry of the carotid bifurcation predicts its exposure to disturbed flow. Stroke 2008, 39:2341-2347.
45. Markl M., Wegent F., Zech T., Bauer S., Strecker C., Schumacher M., Weiller C., Hennig J., Harloff A. In vivo wall shear stress distribution in the carotid artery clinical perspective. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2010, 3:647-655.
46. Lomakina E.B., Waugh R.E. Micromechanical tests of adhesion dynamics between neutrophils and immobilized ICAM-1. Biophys. J. 2004, 86:1223-1233.
47. Weissleder R., Heautot J.F., Schaffer B.K., Nossiff N., Papisov M.I., Bogdanov A., Brady T.J. MR lymphography: study of a high-efficiency lymphotrophic agent. Radiology 1994, 191:225-230.
48. Moghimi S.M., Hunter A.C., Murray J.C. Long-circulating and target-specific nanoparticles: theory to practice. Pharmacol. Rev. 2001, 53:283-318.
49. Chen L.T., Weiss L. The role of the sinus wall in the passage of erythrocytes through the spleen. Blood 1973, 41:529-537.
50. Springer T.A. Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm. Cell 1994, 76:301-314.