"Reaching every student" with a pyramid of intervention approach: One district's journey

Canadian Journal of Education

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 271-304

  Howery, Kathy ^a   McClellan, Tony ^b   Pedersen Bayus, Karen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b Greater St Albert Catholic School District   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875906928     PISSN: 03802361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alberta. Alberta Education (2009) Setting the direction framework. Retrieved November 14, 2010 from http://education.alberta.ca/media/1082136/sc_settingthedirection_framework.pdf
2. Alberta Education (2010), Special Education Coding Criteria 2010/2011 Retrieved November 12, 2010 from http://education.alberta.ca/media/825847/spedcodingcriteria.pdf
3. Alberta Education, Learning and Teaching Resources Branch (2008) Supporting positive behavior in Alberta schools: an intensive individualize approach. Edmonton: Alberta Education
4. Basham, J.D., Israel, M. Graden, J., Poth, R. & Winston, M. (2010) A comprehensive approach to RTI: Embedding Universal Design for Learning and technology. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 243-255
5. Buffum, A., Mattos, M. & Weber, C. (2012). Simplifying Response to Intervention: Four essential guiding principles. Solution Tree Press. Bloomington, Indiana
6. Bunch, G. (2005). Crucial terms for inclusion and special education: confusion in education for learners with disabilities. Retrieved August 13, 2012 from http://www.isec2005.org.uk/isec/abstracts/papers_b/bunch_g.shtml
7. Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klinger, J., Pugash, M., and Richardson, V. (2005) Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195-207
8. City of St. Albert Census, 2010 Retrieved November 11, 2010 from http://www.stalbert.ca/demographics-facts-figures
9. Coyne, P., Ganley, P., Hall, T., Meo, G. Murray, E. & Gordon, D. (2006) Applying Universal Design for Learning in the classroom. In Rose, D. & Meyer, A. (Eds.) A practical reader in Universal Design for Learning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 1-13.
10. Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. J. & Simmons D. C. (2004) Improving beginning reading instruction and intervention for students with LD: Reconciling "All" with "Each". Journal of Learning Disabilities 37 (3), 231-239
11. Edyburn, D. (2010) Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly,33(1), 33-41
12. Edyburn, D. (2008) Principles of universal design and the implications for policy initiatives. Retrieved August 27, 2009 from education.alberta.ca/media/938200/edyburnudlreport.pdf
13. Edyburn, D.L. (2006) Failure is not an option: Collecting, reviewing, and acting on evidence for using technology to enhance academic performance. Learning & Leading with Technology, September 20-23
14. Ferguson, D. (1995) The real challenge of inclusion: Confessions of a 'rabid inclusionist.'Phi Delta Kappan, 77(4), 281-287
15. Ferguson, P.M., Ferguson, D.L., and Taylor, S.J. (1992) (Eds.) Interpreting Disability: A qualitative reader. New York, NY: Teachers College Press
16. Fore, C., Hagan-Burke, S., Burke, M.D., Boon, R. T. & Smith, S. (2008) Academic achievement and class placement in high school: do students with learning disabilities achieve more in one class placement than another? Education & Treatment of Children 31(1) Retrieved August 13, 2012 from http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Education-Treatment-Children/175632876.html
17. Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D.H. & Jackson, R (2002). Providing new access to the general education curriculum. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8-17
18. Knight, J. (2007). Instructional Coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
19. McIntosh, K., Goodman, S. & Bohanon, H. (2010). Toward a true integration of academic and behavior response to intervention systems. Part One: Tier 1 Support. Communiqué: The Newspaper of the National Association of School Psychologists, 39 (2) 13-15
20. McIntosh, MacKay, L. D., Andreou, J. A., Brown, J. A., Mathews, S., Gietz, C., & Bennett, J. L. (2011). Response to Intervention in Canada: Definitions, evidence base, and future directions. Canadian Journal of School Psychology 26 (1) 18-43
21. McLeskey, J., Rosenberg, M.S., & Westling, D. L. (2013) Inclusion: Effective practices for all students. (2nd Ed.)
22. McLeskey, J. & Waldron, N. L. (2011). Educational programs for elementary students with learning disabilities: can they be both effective and inclusive? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(1), 48-57
23. Merriam, S.B. (2009) Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation. (3rd Edition) San Francisco: Wiley
24. Merriam, S. B. (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
25. Pisha, B. & Stahl, S. (2005) The promise of new learning environments for students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic,41(2), 67-75
26. Pugach, M. C. (2001) The stories we choose to tell: Fulfilling the promise of qualitative research for special education. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 439-453
27. Ralabate, P., Hehir, T., Dodd, E., Grindal, T., Vue, G., Eidelman, H., Karger, J., Smith, F., & Carlisle, A. (2012). Universal design for learning: Initiatives on the move: Understanding the impact of the Race to the Top and ARRA funding on the promotion of universal design for learning. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Universal Design for Learning
28. Rose. D. & Meyer, A. (2000) The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. Retrieved November 11, 2010 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED451624&ERICExtSearch_SearchTyp e_0=no&accno=ED451624
29. Rose, D.H. & Meyer, A. (2002) Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD
30. Ruijs, N. M. & Peetsma, T.D. (2009). Effects of inclusion on students with and without special educational needs reviewed. Educational Research Review, 4, 67-79
31. Salend, S.J. & Garrick Duhaney, L.M. (2007) Inclusion: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. In McLeskey, J. (Ed.) Reflections on Inclusion: Classic articles that shaped our thinking. Arlington, Va.: Council for Exceptional Children, 147-159
32. Smith, S. & Okolo, C. (2010). Response to intervention and evidence-based practices: where does technology fit? Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 257-272
33. Sprick, R., Boohner, M. & Garrison, M. (2009). Behavioral Response to Intervention: Creating a continuum of problem-solving and support. Eugene, Oregon: Pacific Northwest Publishing
34. Sprick, R. S., Knight, J., Reinke, W.M., & McKale, T. (2006). Coaching Classroom Management: Strategies for Administrators and Coaches. Eugene, OR: Pacific Northwest
35. Stake, R. E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
36. Strangman, N., Hitchcock, C., Hall, T., Meo, G., & Coyne, (2006). Response-to-instruction and universal design for learning: How might they intersect in the general education classroom? K8 Access Center. http://www.cast.org/library/bycast/index.html
37. Sugai, G. & Horner, R. H. (2002), The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide Positive Behavior Supports. Child and Family Behavior Therapy 24(1/2), 23-50
38. Sugai, G. Applying positive behavioral support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions 2, 1, pp. 131-143 St. Albert Catholic Schools Technology Plan, 2006-09
39. Weber, K., & Bennett, S. (1999). Special Education in Ontario Schools (5th ed.). Scarborough, ON: Prentice Hall Allyn and Bacon Canada
40. Yin, R.K. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. (4th Edition) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.