A comprehensive approach to RTI: Embedding universal design for learning and technology

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 243-255

  Basham, James D ^a   Israel, Maya ^a   Graden, Janet ^a   Poth, Rita ^a   Winston, Markay ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b Cincinnati Public Schools ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874263888     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: 2168376X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073194871003300403     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barnett D. W., Hawkins R. O., Prasse D., MacMann G., Graden J. L., Nantais M., Pan W. The handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. Decision making validity in response to intervention. New York: Springer Science Inc; 2007: 106-116.
2. Basham J., Gardner J. Measuring universal design for learning. Special Education Technology Practice. 2010; 12 (2). 15-19
3. Batsche G., Elliot J., Graden J. L., Grimes J., Kovaleski J. F., Prasse D., Reschly D. J., Schrag J., Tilly W. D. Response to intervention: Policy considerations and Implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education; 2005 :
4. Boyle E. A., Rosenberg M. S., Connelly V. J., Washburn S. G., Brinckerhoff L. C., Banerjee M. Effects of audio texts on the acquisition of secondary-level content by Stud.s with mild disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2003; 26 (3). 203-214
5. Burns M. K., Appleton J. J., Stehouwer J. D. Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2005; 23: 381-394
6. Caplan G. Principles of prevention in psychiatry. New York: Basic Books; 1964 :
7. Universal design for learning guidelines version 1.0. Wakefield, MA: Author; 2008 :
8. Christ T. J., Burns M. K., Ysseldyke J. Conceptual confusion within response-to-intervention vernacular: Clarifying meaningful differences. Communique. 2005; 34: 1-7
9. Darling-Hammond L. The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press; 2010 :
10. Donovan M. S., Cross C. T. Minority Stud.s in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002 :
11. Edyburn D. L. Assistive technology and Stud.s with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Stud.s. 2000; 32 (9). 1-24
12. Edyburn D. L. Rethinking assistive technology. Special Education Technology Practice. 2004; 5 (4). 16-23
13. Edyburn D. L. Evaluating academic performance: With and without technology. MACUL Journal. 2006a; 26 (4). 26 48-27
14. Edyburn D.L. Failure is not an option: Collecting, reviewing, and acting on evidence for using technology to enhance academic performance. Learning and Leading with Technology. 2006b; 34 (1). 20-23
15. Edyburn D. L. Would you recognize Universal Design for Learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions in the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2010; 33 (1). 33-41
16. Fixsen D. L., Naoom S. F., Blase K. A., Friedman R. M., Wallace F. Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network; 2005 :
17. Fuchs D., Fuchs L. S., Stecker P. M. The blurring of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children. 2010; 76 (3). 301-323
18. Gersten R., Beckmann S., Clarke B., Foegen A., Marsh L., Star J. R., Witzel B. Assisting Stud.s struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance; 2009 :
19. Gersten R., Compton D., Connor C. M., Dimino J., Santoro L., Linan-Thompson S., Tilly W.D. Assisting Stud.s struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2008 :
20. Gordon R. S. An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Reports. 1983; 48: 107-109
21. The Higher Education Opportunity Act (Public Law 110-315). Retrieved July 10, 2010, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/highered/leg/hea08/index.html/.
22. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (as amended), 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1401 et seq.
23. Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. Jimerson S. R. Burns M. K. Van Der Heyden A. M., ed. New York: Springer; 2007 :
24. Klingner J. K., Edwards P. A. Cultural considerations with Response to Intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly. 2006; 41 (1). 108-117
25. Lowrey A. L., Basham J. D. Encyclopedia of educational reform and dissent. Hunter T. C. Carper J. C. Lasley T. J. Raisch C. D., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010 :
26. Marston D. Tiers of intervention in Responsiveness to Intervention: Prevention outcomes and learning disabilities identification patterns. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2005; 38 (6). 539-544
27. Mayer R. E. Multiple learning. 2009 ). Multiple learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009 :
28. National Center on Universal Design for Learning. (2009). UDL associated research evidence. Retrieved July 23, 2010, from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines.
29. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (2001). Pub. L. No. 107-110.
30. Parette H. P., Peterson-Karlan G. R., Wojcik B. W., Bardi N. Monitor that progress! Interpreting data trends for AT decision-making. Teaching Exceptional Children. 2007; 39 (7). 22-29
31. President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for Stud.s and their families. Available at http://www.ed.gov/inits/commisionsboards/whspecialeducation/.
32. Quinn B. S., Behrmann M., Mastriopieri M., Chung Y. Who is using assistive technology in schools?. Journal of Special Education Technology. 2009; 24 (1). 1-13
33. Rose D. H., Hasselbring T., Stahl S., Zabala J. Handbook of special education technology research and practice. Edyburn D. Higgins K. Boone R., ed. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design; 2005: 33-41.
34. Rose D. H., Meyer A. Teaching every Stud. in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD; 2002 :
35. Sailor W. Access to the general education: Systems change or tinker some more?. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. 2008; 33 (4). 249-257
36. SchnepsM. H.O'KeeffeJ. K.Heffner-WongA.SonnertG. (in press). Using span-limiting technologies to support close-reading in STEM. Journal of Special Education Technology.
37. Spectrum K12. (2010). 2010 Response to Intervention adoption survey. http://www.spectrumK12.com/rti/the-rti-corner/rti-adoption-report.
38. Sugai G., Horner R. R. The evolution of discipline practices: Schoolwide positive behavior support. Child and Family Behavior Therapy. 2002; 24: 23-50
39. Sugai G., Horner R. R. A promising approach for expanding and sustaining schoolwide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review. 2006; 35: 245-259
40. Vaughn S., Wanzek J., Woodruff A. L., Linan-Thompson S. Validated reading practices for three tiers of intervention. Haager D. H. Vaughn S. Klingner J. K., ed. Baltimore: Brookes; 2007: 11-28.
41. Wiggins G., McTighe J. Understanding by design, expanded. 2005 ). Understanding by design, expanded2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 2005 :
42. Yell M. L. The law and special education. 2006 ). The law and special education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall; 2006 :