Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 33-41

  Edyburn, Dave L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950649512     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073194871003300103     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Amazon.com. (2009, December 7). Blind and vision-impaired readers to benefit from new Kindle features in 2010 (press release). Retrieved December 12, 2009, from http://phx.corporate-ir. net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&p=irol- newsArticle&ID=1362556 highlight=
2. Burke, M. D., Hagan, S. L., & Grossen, B. (1998). What curricular designs and strategies accommodate diverse learners? Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(1), 34-38.
3. Castellani, J., Mason, C., & Orkwis, R. (2005). Universal design for learning: A guide for teachers and education professionals. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
4. Center for Applied Special Technology. (1994). WiggleWorks (software). New York: Scholastic.
5. Center for Applied Special Technology. (2004). Thinking Reader (software). Watertown, MA: Tom Snyder Productions.
6. Center for Applied Special Technology. (2008). UDL Editions by CAST. Available at http://udleditions.cast.org/
7. Center for Applied Special Technology. (2009a). CAST UDL Book Builder. Available at http://bookbuilder.cast.org/
8. Center for Applied Special Technology. (2009b). CAST Science Writer. Available at http://sdencewriter.cast.org/
9. Center for Universal Design. (1997). The principles of universal design. Retrieved December 11, 2009, from http://www.design. ncsu.edu/cud/about-ud/ udprinciplestext.htm/
10. Coyne, M. D., Kameenui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (2004). Improving beginning reading instruction and intervention for students with LD: Reconciling "all" with "each." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(3), 231-239.
11. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
12. Dewey, J. (1929). The sources of a science of education. New York: Liveright.
13. Edyburn, D. L. (2006). Cognitive prostheses for students with mild disabilities: Is this what assistive technology looks like? Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(4), 62-65.
14. Edyburn, D. L. (in press). Understanding the quality of the science supporting the special education technology evidence base. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(1).
15. Edyburn, D., & Gardner, J. E. (2009). Readings in special education technology: Universal design for learning. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
16. Gage, N. L (1978). The scientific basis of the art of teaching. New York: John Wiley.
17. The Higher Education Opportunity Act (Public Law 110-315). Retrieved December 9, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/highered/leg/hea08/index.html/
18. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. (1997). Pub. L. No.105-17.
19. Ketterlin-Geiler, L. R. (2005). Knowing what all students know: Procedures for developing universal design for assessment. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(3). Electronic Journal. Retrieved on December 21, 2005, from http://www bc.edu/research/intasc/jtla/journal/v4n2. shtml/
20. King-Sears, M. (2009). Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 199-201.
21. McLeskey, J., & Waldon, N. (2007) Making differences ordinary in inclusive classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 42(3), 162-168.
22. Meyer, A., & Rose, D.H. (2000). Universal design for individual differences. Educational Leadership, 58(3), 39-43.
23. Molenbroek, J. F., & de Bruin, R. (2006). Anthropometry of a friendly rest room. Assistive Technology, 18(2), 196-204.
24. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (2001). Pub. L. No.107-110.
25. Orkwis, R., & McLane, K. (1998). A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access. OSEP Topical Brief. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
26. Rose, D. H., Hasselbring, T. S., Stahl, S., & Zabala, J. (2005). Assistive technology and universal design for learning: Two sides of the same coin. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 507-518). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
27. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2000). The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. A report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Technology. Washington, DC: USDOE.
28. Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
29. Russell, M., Hoffman, T., & Higgins, J. (2009). NimbleTools: A universally designed test delivery system. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(2), 6-12.
30. Schlechty, P. (2002). Working on the work: An action plan for teachers, principals, and superintendents. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Schwanke, T. D., Smith, R. O., & Edyburn, D. L. (2001). A3 model diagram developed as accessibility and universal design instructional tool. RESNA 2001 Annual Conference Proceedings, 21, RESNA Press.
32. Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86-97.
33. The Technology-Related Assistance Act for Individuals With Disabilities. (1988). Pub. L. No.100-407.
34. Thompson, S. J., Johnstone, C. J., & Thurlow, M. L. (2002). Universal design applied to large-scale assessments (NCEO Synthesis Report 44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
35. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
36. Tomlinson, C. A. (2004). The Mobius effect: Addressing learner variance in schools. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 516-524.
37. Welch, A. B. (2000). Responding to student concerns about fairness. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(2), 36-40.