Rhetorical robots: Making robots more effective speakers using linguistic cues of expertise

ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 341-348

  Andrist, Sean ^a   Spannan, Erin ^a   Mutlu, Bilge ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

Human robot dialogue; linguistic cues of expertise; persuasion; rhetorical ability; robot speech

Indexed keywords

DIALOGUE STRATEGY; EXPERT KNOWLEDGE; HUMAN-ROBOT DIALOGUE; INFORMATION BOOTHS; MUSEUM GUIDE; PERSUASION; RHETORICAL ABILITY; TWO-DIMENSION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84875726448     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21672148     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2013.6483608     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. E. Campione and J. Véronis. A large-scale multilingual study of silent pause duration. In Proc. Speech Prosody '02, pages 199-202, 2002.
2. J. G. Carbonell. Metaphor: an inescapable phenomenon in natural language comprehension. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1981.
3. R. Carlson, K. Gustafson, and E. Strangert. Cues for hesitation in speech synthesis. In Proc. Interspeech '06, volume 6, 2006.
4. M. Chi, R. Glaser, and E. Rees. Expertise in problem solving. Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 1981.
5. V. Chidambaram, Y.-H. Chiang, and B. Mutlu. Designing persuasive robots: how robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues. In Proc. HRI '12, HRI '12, pages 293-300, 2012.
6. B. Fogg and H. Tseng. The elements of computer credibility. In Proc. CHI '99, pages 80-87, 1999.
7. S. K. Foss and C. L. Griffin. Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communications Monographs, 62(1):2-18, 1995.
8. M. Glass, J. Kim, M. Evens, J. Michael, and A. Rovick. Novice vs. expert tutors: A comparison of style. In Proc. MAICS '99, pages 43-49, 1999.
9. J. Ham, R. Bokhorst, R. Cuijpers, D. van der Pol, and J.-J. Cabibihan. Making robots persuasive: The influence of combining persuasive strategies (gazing and gestures) by a storytelling robot on its persuasive power. In Social Robotics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 71-83. Springer-Verlag, 2011.
10. E. J. Hartelius. The rhetoric of expertise. PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, 2008.
11. N. Harvey and I. Fischer. Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(2):117-133, 1997. (Pubitemid 127340871)
12. J. R. Hobbs. Metaphor, metaphor schemata, and selective inferencing. Technical Report 204, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, 1979.
13. M. Hyde. The ethos of rhetoric. Univ South Carolina Press, 2004.
14. E. Isaacs and H. Clark. References in conversation between experts and novices. J Experimental Psychology: General, 116(1):26, 1987.
15. C. Kidd and C. Breazeal. Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction. In Proc. IROS '08, pages 3230-3235, 2008.
16. I. Kinchin. Effective teacher student dialogue: a model from biological education. J Biological Education, 37(3):110-113, 2003. (Pubitemid 36755350)
17. J. Larkin, J. McDermott, D. Simon, and H. Simon. Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208(4450):1335, 1980.
18. R. Looije, M. A. Neerincx, and F. Cnossen. Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: Design and evaluation of social behaviors. Intl J Human-Computer Studies, 68(6):386-397, 2010.
19. G. Marwell and D. Schmitt. Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Sociometry, pages 350-364, 1967.
20. J. Noel. On the varieties of phronesis. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 31(3):273-289, 1999.
21. M. Roubroeks, J. Ham, and C. Midden. The dominant robot: Threatening robots cause psychological reactance, especially when they have incongruent goals. Persuasive Technology, pages 174-184, 2010.
22. M. Siegel, C. Breazeal, and M. Norton. Persuasive robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior. In Proc. IROS '09, pages 2563-2568, 2009.
23. J. Sniezek and L. Van Swol. Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(2):288-307, 2001. (Pubitemid 33654490)
24. C. Torrey. How robots can help: Communication strategies that improve social outcomes. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2009.
25. C. Torrey, A. Powers, M. Marge, S. Fussell, and S. Kiesler. Effects of adaptive robot dialogue on information exchange and social relations. In Proc. HRI '06, pages 126-133, 2006. (Pubitemid 44032398)