Taking Advice: Accepting Help, Improving Judgment, and Sharing Responsibility

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 117-133

  Harvey, Nigel ^a   Fischer, Ilan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013046644     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2697     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adams J. A., Goetz E. T. Feedback and practice as variables in error detection and correction. Journal of Motor Behavior. 5:1973;217-224.
2. Adelman L. The influence of formal, substantive, and contextual task properties on the relative effectiveness of different forms of feedback in multiple-cue probability learning tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 27:1981;423-442.
3. Ahlburg D. A. Error measures and the choice of a forecast method. International Journal of Forecasting. 8:1992;99-100.
4. Arkes H. R., Christensen C., Lai C., Blumer C. Two methods of reducing overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 39:1987;133-144.
5. Armstrong J. S., Collopy F. Error measures for generalizing about forecasting methods: Empirical comparisons. International Journal of Forecasting. 8:1992;69-80.
6. Berry D. C., Broadbent D. On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 36A:1984;209-231.
7. Birnbaum M. H., Stegner S. E. Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise and the judge's point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37:1979;48-74.
8. Birnbaum M. H., Wong R., Wong L. K. Combining information from sources that vary in credibility. Memory and Cognition. 4:1976;330-336.
9. Box G. E. P., Cox D. R. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B. 26:1964;211-252.
10. Brehmer B. Single-cue probability learning as a function of the sign and magnitude of the correlation between cue and criterion. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 9:1973;377-395.
11. Brehmer B., Kuylenstierna J., Liljergren J.-E. Effects of function form and cue validity on the subjects' hypotheses in probabilistic inference tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 11:1974;338-354.
12. Bulmer M. The Royal Commission and departmental committee in the British policy-making process. Advising West European governments: Inquires, expertise and public policy. 1993;Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
13. Carbone R., Armstrong J. S. Evaluation of extrapolative forecasting methods: Results of a survey of academicians and practitioners. Journal of Forecasting. 1:1982;215-217.
14. Chaiken S., Maheswaran D. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 66:1994;460-473.
15. Chatfield C. Editorial. Apples, oranges and mean square error. International Journal of Forecasting. 4:1988;515-518.
16. Connolly T., Wholey D. R. Information mispurchase in judgment tasks: A task-driven causal mechanism. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 42:1988;75-87.
17. Edgell S. E. Using configural and dimensional information. Castellan N. J. Jr. Individual and group decision making. 1993;43-64 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
18. Fildes R. The evaluation of extrapolative forecasting methods. International Journal of Forecasting. 8:1992;81-98.
19. Gardner D. H., Berry D. C. The effect of different forms of advice on the control of a simulated complex system. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 9:1995;555-579.
20. Hammond K. R., Summers D. A. Cognitive dependence on linear and nonlinear cues. Psychological Review. 72:1965;215-224.
21. Harvey N. Relations between confidence and skilled performance. Wright G., Ayton P. Subjective probability. 1994;321-352 Wiley, New York.
22. Harvey N., Bolger F. Graphs versus tables: Effects of data presentation format on judgmental forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting. 12:1996;119-137.
23. Hell W., Gigerenzer G., Gauggel S., Mall M., Müller M. Hindsight bias: An interaction of automatic and motivational factors? Memory and Cognition. 16:1988;533-538.
24. Hogarth R. M., Einhorn H. J. Order effects in belief updating: The Belief Adjustment Model. Cognitive Psychology. 24:1992;1-55.
25. Koehler D., Harvey N. Confidence judgments by actors and observers. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 1997.
26. Latané B., Nida S. Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin. 89:1981;307-324.
27. Lee J.-W., Yates J. F. How quantity judgment changes as the number of cues increases: An analytical framework and review. Psychological Bulletin. 112:1992;363-377.
28. McKenna F. P. It won't happen to me: Unrealistic optimism or illusion of control? British Journal of Psychology. 84:1993;39-50.
29. Makridakis S., Wheelwright S. C., McGee V. Forecasting: methods and applications. 1983;Wiley, New York.
30. Marteau T. M., Johnston M., Wynne G., Evans T. R. Cognitive factors in the explanation of the mismatch between confidence and competence in performing basic life support. Psychology and Health. 3:1989;172-182.
31. Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J. The adaptive decision maker. 1993;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. Petty R. E., Cacciopo J. T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 19:1986;123-205.
33. Petty R. E., Cacciopo J. T., Goldman R. Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 41:1981;847-855.
34. Sanderson P. Verbalizable knowledge and skilled task performance: Associations, dissociations, and mental models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 15:1989;729-747.
35. Schmitt N., Coyle B. W., Saari B. B. Types of task information in multiple-cue probability learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 18:1977;316-328.
36. Sniezek J. A., Buckley T. Becoming more or less uncertain. Castellan N. J. Jr. Individual and group decision making. 1993;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
37. Sniezek J. A., Buckley T. Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 62:1995;159-174.
38. Stanley W. B., Buss R. R., Kotler-Cope S. Insight without awareness: On the interaction of verbalization, instruction and practice in a simulated process control task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 41A:1989;553-577.
39. Stewart T. R. Judgment analysis: Procedures. Brehmer B., Joyce C. R. B. Human judgment: The SJT view. 1988;43-64 Amsterdam, Elsevier North-Holland.
40. Stewart T. R., Lusk C. M. Seven components of judgmental forecasting skill: Implications for research and the improvement of forecasts. Journal of Forecasting. 13:1994;579-599.
41. Summers D A., Hammond K. R. Inference behavior in multiple-cue tasks involving both linear and nonlinear relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 71:1966;751-757.
42. Svenson O. Are we all less risky and more skilful than our fellow drivers are? Acta Psychologica. 47:1981;143-148.
43. Trafimow D., Sniezek J. A. Perceived expertise and its effects on confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 57:1994;290-302.
44. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science. 185:1974;1124-1131.
45. Wheelwright S. C., Makridakis S. Forecasting methods for management. 1985;Wiley, New York.
46. Wood W. Retrieval of attitude relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 42:1982;798-810.
47. Wood W., Kallgren C., Priesler R. Access to attitude relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 21:1985;73-85.
48. Yates J. F., Stone E. R. The risk construct. Yates J. F. Risk-taking behavior. 1992;Wiley, New York.