How Do Children Restrict Their Linguistic Generalizations? An (Un-)Grammaticality Judgment Study

Cognitive Science

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 508-543

  Ambridge, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Child language acquisition; Derivational morphology; Entrenchment; Pre emption; Retreat from overgeneralization; Un prefixation; Verb semantics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875596738     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12018     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Alishahi, A., & Stevenson, S. (2008). A computational model of early argument structure acquisition. Cognitive Science, 32(5), 789-834.
2. Ambridge, B. (2011) Paradigms for assessing children's knowledge of syntax and morphology. In E. Hoff (Ed.) Guide to research methods in child language (pp. 113-132). London: Blackwell-Wiley.
3. Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F. (2011). Children use verb semantics to retreat from overgeneralization errors: A novel verb grammaticality judgment study. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2), 303-323.
5. Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F. (2012). Semantics versus statistics in the retreat from locative overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 123, 260-279.
6. Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Chang, F. (2012). The roles of verb semantics, entrenchment and morphophonology in the retreat from dative argument structure overgeneralization errors. Language, 88(1), 45-81.
7. Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Freudenthal, D., & Chang, F. (2012). The retreat from dative overgeneralization errors: Semantics, statistics or both?. Language & Cognitive Processes.
8. Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Jones, R. L., & Clark, V. (2009). A semantics-based approach to the "no negative evidence" problem. Cognitive Science, 33(7), 1301-1316.
9. Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Young, C. R. (2008). The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children's and adults' graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 106(1), 87-129.
10. Baayen, R. H. (2011). LanguageR. R package version 1.4. R Core Development Team.
11. Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2011). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-3.
12. Bod, R. (2009). From exemplar to grammar: A probabilistic analogy-based model of language learning. Cognitive Science, 33(5), 752-793.
13. Bowerman, M. (1981). The child's expression of meaning: Expanding relationships among lexicon, syntax and morphology. Paper presented at the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on Native Language and Foreign Language Acquisition.
14. Bowerman, M. (1988). The "no negative evidence" problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In J. A. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 73-101). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
15. Boyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language, 85, 55-83.
16. Braine, M. D. S., & Brooks, P. J. (1995). Verb argument strucure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar. In M. Tomasello, & W. E. Merriman (Eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children's acquisition of verbs (pp. 352-376). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Brooks, P. J., & Tomasello, M. (1999). How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75(4), 720-738.
18. Brooks, P. J., Tomasello, M., Dodson, K., & Lewis, L. B. (1999). Young children's overgeneralizations with fixed transitivity verbs. Child Development, 70(6), 1325-1337.
19. Brooks, P. J., & Zizak, O. (2002). Does preemption help children learn verb transitivity? Journal of Child Language, 29(4), 759-781.
20. Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. E. (2005). Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8(6), 500-508.
21. Chater, N., & Vitanyi, P. (2007). 'Ideal learning' of natural language: Positive results about learning from positive evidence. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 51(3), 135-163.
22. Chouinard, M. M., & Clark, E. V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 637-669.
23. Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Clark, E. V., & Bernicot, J. (2008). Repetition as ratification: How parents and children place information in common ground. Journal of Child Language, 35(2), 349-371.
25. Clark, E. V., Carpenter, K. L., & Deutsch, W. (1995). Reference states and reversals: Undoing actions with verbs. Journal of Child Language, 22(3), 633-662.
26. Clark, E. V., & Clark, H. H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language, 55, 767-811.
27. Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Dabrowska, E., & Lieven, E. (2005). Towards a lexically specific grammar of children's question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), 437-474.
29. Demetras, M. J., Post, K. N., & Snow, C. E. (1986). Feedback to first language learners: The role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language, 13(2), 275-292.
30. Dowman, M. (2000). Addressing the learnability of verb subcategorizations with Bayesian inference. In L. Gleitman & A. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 107-112). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
31. Farrar, M. J. (1992). Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 90-98.
32. Gahl, S., & Yu, A. C. L. (2006). Introduction to the special issue on exemplar-based models in linguistics. The Linguistic Review, 23, 213-216.
33. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34. Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Corpus evidence of the viability of statistical preemption. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 131-154.
35. Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., & Goldberg, R. (1991). Syntax and semantics in the acquisition of locative verbs. Journal of Child Language, 18(1), 115-151.
36. Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2008). Inference from absence in language and thought. In N. Chater, & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind (pp. 107-112). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
37. Hsu, A. (2009). Differential use of implicit negative evidence in generative and discriminative language learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 22, 754-762.
38. Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction. Language, 75(1), 1-33.
39. Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1-63). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
40. Li, P., & MacWhinney, B. (1996). Cryptotype, overgeneralization, and competition: A connectionist model of the learning of English reversive prefixes. Connection Science, 8, 3-30.
41. Lieber, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1993). Verbal prefixes in dutch: A study in lexical conceptual structure. In G. E. Booijand & J. Van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993 (pp. 51-78). Dordrecht, The Netherlands, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
42. MacKey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338-356.
43. MacWhinney, B. (2004). A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 31(4), 883-914.
44. Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English word-formation (2nd ed.). Munich, Germany: Verlag.
45. Marcus, G. F. (1993). Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition, 46(1), 53-85.
46. Maslen, R. J. C., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M. (2004). A dense corpus study of past tense and plural over-regularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47, 1319-33.
47. Matthews, D., & Bannard, C. (2010). Children's production of unfamiliar word sequences is predicted by positional variability and latent classes in a large sample of child-directed speech. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 465-488.
48. Moerk, E. L. (1990). 3-Term contingency patterns in mother-child verbal interactions during 1st-language acquisition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54(3), 293-305.
49. Naigles, L., Fowler, A., & Helm, A. (1992). Developmental shifts in the construction of verb meanings. Cognitive Development, 7, 403-427.
50. Naigles, L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. R. (1993). Syntactic Bootstrapping and Verb Acquisition. In E. Dromi (Ed.), Language and cognition: A developmental perspective. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
51. Onnis, L., Roberts, M., & Chater, N. (2002). Simplicity: A cure for overregularizations in language acquisition? In W. Gray, & C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 720-725). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
52. Penner, S. G. (1987). Parental responses to grammatical and ungrammatical child utterances. Child Development, 58(2), 376-384.
53. Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Regier, T. (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition, 118, 306-338.
54. Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Wonnacott, E. (2010). Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions. Journal of Child Language, 37, 607-642.
55. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Ramscar, M., & Yarlett, D. (2007). Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 31, 927-960.
57. Saxton, M., Backley, P., & Gallaway, C. (2005). Negative input for grammatical errors: Effects after a lag of 12 weeks. Journal of Child Language, 32(3), 643-672.
58. Stefanowitsch, A. (2008). Negative evidence and preemption: A constructional approach to ungrammaticality. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3), 513-531.
59. Stefanowitsch, A. (2011). Constructional preemption by contextual mismatch: A corpus-linguistic investigation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 107-129.
60. Strapp, C. M., Bleakney, D. M., Helmick, A. L., & Tonkovich, H. M. (2008). Developmental differences in the effects of negative and positive evidence. First Language, 28(1), 35-53.
61. Suttle, L., & Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Partial productivity of argument structure constructions. Linguistics, 49(6), 1237-1269.
62. Theakston, A. L. (2004). The role of entrenchment in children's and adults' performance on grammaticality judgement tasks. Cognitive Development, 19(1), 15-34.
63. Theakston, A. L., Maslen, R., Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M. (2012). The acquisition of the active transitive construction in English: A detailed case study. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(1), 91-128.
64. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Wonnacott, E. (2011). Balancing generalization and lexical conservatism: An artificial language study with child learners. Journal of Memory & Language, 65, 1-14.
67. Wonnacott, E., Newport, E. L., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language. Cognitive Psychology, 56(3), 165-209.