Diversity of autochthonous roses in flanders (Belgium) in the view of the European GENEROSE reference framework

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 760, Issue , 2007, Pages 621-628

  De Cock, K ^a,b   Mijnsbrugge, K Vander ^b   Breyne, P ^b   Nybom, H ^c   Smulders, M J M ^d   Van Slycken, J ^b   De Riek, J ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES RESEARCH ILVO   (Belgium)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^d WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

AFLP; Canina; Dog roses; Genetic variation; Hybridisation; Rosa; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

CANIDAE; CANIS FAMILIARIS; ROSA; ROSA ARKANSANA; ROSA CANINA; ROSA DUMALIS; ROSA TOMENTELLA;

EID: 70449491504     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.760.88     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Blackburn, K.B. and Heslop-Harrison, J.W. 1921. The status of the British rose forms as determined by their cytological behaviour. Ann. Bot. 35(85): 159-188.
2. Darlington, C.D. and Wylie, A.P. 1961. Chromosome atlas of flowering plants. George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London.
3. Henker, H. 2000. Rosa. In: Gustav Hegi, Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa, Band IV, Teil 2C, Lieferung A.2. Auflage. Parey Buchverlag im Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, Berlin.
4. Kleinschmit, J.R.G., Kownatzki, D. and Gregorius, H.R. 2004. Adaptational characteristics of autochthonous populations-consequences for provenance delineation. Forest Ecology and Management. 197: 213-224.
5. Linneaus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum. Holmiae. Tomus. 1: 491-492.
6. Rieseberg, L.H. and Ellstrand, N.C. 1993. What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridisation? Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12(3)-213-241.
7. Täckholm, G. 1920. On the cytology of the Genus Rosa. A preliminary note. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 14: 300-311.
8. Täckholm, G. 1922. Zytologische Studien über die Gattung Rosa. Acta Horti Berg. 7(3): 97-381.
9. Thomaes, A., Vander Mijnsbrugge, K. and De Cock, K. 2004. Taxonomie, ecologie en verspreiding van inheemse rozen in Vlaanderen. Rapport IBW Bb R 2004.020. Instituut voor Bosbouw en Wildbeheer, Geraardsbergen.
10. Vander Mijnsbrugge, K., Cox, K. and Vanslycken, J. 2005. Conservation Approaches For Autochthonous Woody Plants in Flanders. Silvae Genetica. 54:4-5.
11. Van Huylenbroeck, J., Smulders, M.J.M, Debener, T., Nybom, H., Gudin, S., Cox, P., Crespel, L. and De Riek, J. 2005. GENEROSE: Genetic Evalutation of European Rose Resources for Conservation and Horticultural Use. Acta Hort. 690: 119-123.
12. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., Frijters, A., Pot, J., Peleman, J., Kuiper, M. and Zabeau, M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research. 23(21): 4407-4414.
13. Werlemark, G. and Nybom, H. 2001. Skewed distribution of morphological character scores and molecular markers in three interspecific crosses in Rosa section Caninae. Hereditas. 134: 1-13.
14. Wissemann, V. and Hellwig, F.H. 1997. Reproduction and hybridisation in the Genus Rosa, section Caninae (Ser.) Rehd. Bot. Acta. 110: 251-256.