Microsatellite DNA marker inheritance indicates preferential pairing between two highly homologous genomes in polyploid and hemisexual dog-roses, Rosa L. Sect. Caninae DC

Heredity

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 139-150

  Nybom, H ^a   Esselink, G D ^b   Werlemark, G ^a   Vosman, B ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Apomixis; Heterogamy; Interspecific hybridization; Microsatellite DNA; Polyploidy; Rosa sect. Caninae

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

APOMIXIS; GENETIC MARKER; HYBRIDIZATION; POPULATION GENETICS; RECOMBINATION;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; GENDER AND SEX; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; GENOME; INHERITANCE; MEIOSIS; PHYLOGENY; PLANT SEED; POLYPLOIDY; ROSE; SEX; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ALLELES; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME, PLANT; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MEIOSIS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; POLYPLOIDY; ROSA; SEEDS; SEX; SEX DETERMINATION (GENETICS); SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

CANIDAE; CANIS FAMILIARIS; ROSA; ROSA CANINA; ROSA EGLANTERIA; ROSA VILLOSA; VILLOSA;

EID: 1842539625     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800332     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Amsellem L, Dutech C, Billotte N (2001). Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in Rubus alceifolius Poir. (Rosaceae), an invasive weed in La Réunion island. Mol Ecol Notes 1: 33-35.
2. Becher SA, Steinmetz K, Weising K, Boury S, Peltier D, Renou J-P, et al (2000). Microsatellites for cultivar identification in Pelargonium. Theor Appl Genet 101: 643-651.
3. Blackburn K, Heslop-Harrison JW (1921). The status of the British rose forms as determined by their cytological behaviour. Ann Bot 35: 159-188.
4. Blackhurst HT (1948). Cytogenetic studies on Rosa rubiginosa and its hybrids. Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 52: 510-516.
5. Bryan GJ, Collins AJ, Stephenson P, Orry A, Smith JB, Gale MD (1997). Isolation and characterisation of microsatellites from hexaploid bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 94: 557-563.
6. Buteler MI, Jarret RL, LaBonte DR (1999). Sequence characterization of microsatellites in diploid and polyploid Ipomoea. Theor Appl Genet 99: 123-132.
7. Debener T, Mattiesch L, Vosman B (2001). A molecular marker map for roses. Acta Hort 547: 283-287.
8. Esselink GD, Smulders MJM, Vosman B (2003). Identification of cut rose (Rosa hybrida) and rootstock varieties using robust sequence tagged microsatellite site markers. Theor Appl Genet 106: 277-286.
9. Fagerlind F (1944). Kompatibilität und inkompatibilität in der Gattung Rosa. Acta Horti Bergiani 13: 274-302.
10. Falque M, Keurentjes J, Bakx-Schotman JMT, van Dijk PJ (1998). Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in the sexual-apomictic complex Taraxacum officinale (dandelion). Theor Appl Genet 97: 283-292.
11. Gatt M, Hammett K, Murray B (1999). Confirmation of ancient polyploidy in Dahlia (Asteraceae) species using genomic in situ hybridization. Ann Bot 84: 39-48.
12. Grant V (1971). Plant Speciation. Columbia Press: New York.
13. Guilford P, Prakash S, Zhu JM, Rikkerink E, Gardiner S, Bassett H et al (1997). Microsatellites in Malus x domestica (apple): abundance, polymorphism and cultivar identification. Theor Appl Genet 94: 249-254.
14. Gustafsson Å (1944). The constitution of the Rosa canina complex. Hereditas 30: 405-428.
15. Gustafsson Å, Håkansson A (1942). Meiosis in some Rosa-hybrids. Bot Notiser 95: 331-343.
16. Hokanson SC, Szewc-McFadden AK, Lamboy WF, McFerson JR (1998). Microsatellite (SSR) markers reveal genetic identities, genetic diversity and relationships in a Malus x domestica Borkh. core subset collection. Theor Appl Genet 97: 671-683.
17. Holm S (1995). Unexpected high levels of genetic variation in Potentilla argentea L. (s.l.) in southern Sweden. Hereditas 123: 127-139.
18. Hurst CC (1927). Differential polyploidy in the genus Rosa L. Z Induk Abstamm-Ver Suppl, 2: 866-906.
19. Jones CJ, Edwards KJ, Castiglione S, Winfield MO, Sala F, Van de Wiel C et al (1997). Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol Breeding 3: 381-390.
20. Klasterska I, Klastersky I (1974). Cytology and some chromosome numbers of Czechoslovak roses II. Bot Notiser 127: 328-337.
21. Kroon GH, Zeilinga AE (1974). Apomixis and heterogamy in rose rootstocks (Rosa canina L.). Euphytica 23: 345-352.
22. Lian C, Nara K, Nakaya H, Zhou Z, Wu B, Miyashita N et al (2001). Development of microsatellite markers in polyploid Salix reinii. Mol Ecol Notes 1: 160-161.
23. Ma Y, Crane CF, Byrne DH (2000). Meiotic behavior in a tetraploid rose and its hybrid progeny. HortScience 35: 1127-1131.
24. Mengoni A, Gori A, Bazzicalupo M (2000). Use of RAPD and microsatellite (SSR) variation to assess genetic relationships among populations of tetraploid alfalfa, Medicago sativa. Plant Breeding 119: 311-317.
25. Nilsson Ö (1967). Drawings of Scandinavian plants 1-8, Rosa L. Bot Notiser 120: 1-8, 137-143, 249-254, 393-408.
26. Nybom H, Carlson-Nilsson U, Werlemark G, Uggla M (1997). Different levels of morphometric variation in three heterogamous dogrose species (Rosa Sect. Caninae). Pl Syst Evol 204: 207-224.
27. Nybom H, Olsson Å, Werlemark G (1996). Morphometric variation in Nordic dogroses (Rosa sect. Caninae, Rosaceae). Symb Bot Ups 31: 59-68.
28. Olsson ÅME (1999). Morphometric and molecular variation in the Nordic dogroses (Rosa sect. Caninae, Rosaceae). PhD Thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
29. Olsson Å, Nybom H, Prentice HC (2000). Relationships between Nordic dogroses (Rosa L. sect. Caninae, Rosaceae) assessed by RAPDs and elliptic Fourier analysis of leaflet shape. Syst Bot 25: 511-521.
30. Provan J, Powell W, Waugh R (1996). Microsatellite analysis of relationships within cultivated potato (Solanum tuberosum). Theor Appl Genet 92: 1078-1084.
31. Roberts AV (1975). The nature and taxonomic significance of the system of inheritance in Rosa nanothamnus (Rosaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 71: 59-66.
32. Sosinski B, Gannavarapu M, Hager LD, Beck LE, King GJ, Ryder CD et al (2000). Characterization of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. Theor Appl Genet 101: 421-428.
33. Täckholm G (1920). On the cytology of the genus Rosa. Svensk Bot Tidskrift 14: 300-311.
34. Täckholm G (1922). Zytologische Studien über die Gattung Rosa. Acta Horti Bergiani 7: 97-381.
35. Wendel JF (2000). Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol Biol 42: 225-249.
36. Werlemark G (2000). Evidence of apomixis in hemisexual dogrose species. Rosa sect. Caninae. Sexual Plant Reprod 12: 353-359.
37. Werlemark G, Nybom H (2001). Skewed distribution of morphological character scores and molecular markers in three interspecific crosses in Rosa section Caninae. Hereditas 134: 1-13.
38. Werlemark G, Uggla M, Nybom H (1999). Highly skewed distribution of morphological and RAPD markers in a pair of reciprocal crosses between hemisexual dogrose species, Rosa sect. Caninae. Theor Appl Genet 98: 557-563.
39. Wisseman V (1999). Genetic constitution of Rosa Sect. Caninae (R. canina, R. jundzillii) and Sect. Gallicanae (R. gallica). J Appl Bot 73: 191-196.
40. Wisseman V, Hellwig FH (1997). Reproduction and hybridisation in the genus Rosa, Section Caninae (Ser.) Rehd. Bot Acta 110: 251-256.
41. Zielinski J (1985). Studia nad radzajem Rosa L. - Systematika sekcji Caninae DC. em. Christ. Arboretum Körnickie Rocznik 30: 3-10.