Microsatellite analyses of artificial and spontaneous dogrose hybrids reveal the hybridogenic origin of Rosa micrantha by the contribution of unreduced gametes

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 217-227

  Ritz, Christiane M ^a   Wissemann, Volker ^b  

^a SENCKENBERG MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY GÖRLITZ   (Germany)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

anorthoploidy; hybridization; meiosis; polyploidy; sect. Caninae

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HEXAPLOIDY; HYBRIDIZATION; INTERSPECIFIC HYBRID; MEIOSIS; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NATURAL POPULATION; NONHUMAN; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENETICS; POLLEN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROSA CANINA; ROSA CORYMBIFERA; ROSA DUMALIS; ROSA MICRANTHA; ROSE; SPECIES; UNREDUCED GAMETE;

ALLELES; CHIMERA; CROSSES, GENETIC; GENETIC VARIATION; GERM CELLS; MEIOSIS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; PLOIDIES; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; ROSA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

CANIDAE; ROSA MICRANTHA;

EID: 79951997852     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esq124     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andersen N, Poulsen G, Andersen B, Kiær LP, D'Hertefeldt T, Wilkinson M, Jørgensen R. 2009. Processes affecting genetic structure and conservation: a case study of wild and cultivated Brassica rapa. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 56:189-200.
2. Arnold ML. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bartish IV, Rumpunen K, Nybom H. 2000. Combined analyses of RAPDs, cpDNA and morphology demonstrate spontaneous hybridization in the plant genus Chaenomeles. Heredity. 85:383-392. (Pubitemid 32122099)
4. Blackburn KB. 1925. Chromosomes and classification in the genus Rosa. Am Nat. 59:200-204.
5. Blackburn KB, Heslop-Harrison JW. 1921. The status of the British rose forms as determined by their cytological behaviour. Ann Bot. 35:159-188.
6. Blackhurst HT. 1948. Cytogenetic studies on Rosa rubiginosa and its hybrids. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci. 52:510-516.
7. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. 2004.Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell. 16:1667-1678. (Pubitemid 38908767)
8. Cruzan MB, Arnold ML. 1999. Consequences of cytonuclear epistasis and assortative mating for the genetic structure of hybrid populations. Heredity. 82:36-45. (Pubitemid 29087448)
9. Darmency H, Lefol E, Fleury A. 1998. Spontaneous hybridizations between oilseed rape and wild radish. Mol Ecol. 7:1467-1473. (Pubitemid 28504064)
10. De Cock K, Mijnsbrugge K, Breyne P, Bockstaele VE, Slycken VJ. 2008. Morphological and AFLP-based differentiation within the taxonomical complex section Caninae (subgenus Rosa). Ann Bot. 102:685-697.
11. Ellstrand NC, Garner LC, Hegde S, Guadagnuolo R, Blancas L. 2007. Spontaneous hybridization between maize and teosinte. J Hered. 98:183-187. (Pubitemid 47356038)
12. Ellstrand NC, Whitkus R, Rieseberg LH. 1996. Distribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93:5090-5093. (Pubitemid 26162875)
13. Esselink GD, Nybom H, Vosman B. 2004. Assignment of allelic configuration in polyploids using the MAC-PR (microsatellite DNA allele counting-peak ratios) method. Theor Appl Genet. 109:402-408. (Pubitemid 39059553)
14. Esselink GD, Smulders MJM, Vosman B. 2003. Identification of cut rose (Rosa hybrida) and rootstock varieties using robust sequence tagged microsatellite site markers. Theor Appl Genet. 106:277-286. (Pubitemid 36599883)
15. Fishman L, Willis JH. 2006. A cytonuclear incompatibility causes anther sterility in Mimulus hybrids. Evolution. 60:1372-1381. (Pubitemid 44795581)
16. Garcia-Verdugo C, Fay MF, Granado-Yela C, Casas RR, Balaguer L, Besnard G, Vargas P. 2009. Genetic diversity and differentiation processes in the ploidy series of Olea europaea L.: a multiscale approach from subspecies to insular populations. Mol Ecol. 18:454-467.
17. Gustafsson A. 1944. The constitution of the Rosa canina complex. Hereditas. 30:405-428.
18. Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ. 2005. Hybrid speciation in plants: new insights from molecular studies. New Phytol. 165:411-423. (Pubitemid 40177953)
19. Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ. 2009. The complex nature of allopolyploid plant genomes. Heredity. 103:100-101.
20. Henker H. 2000. Rosa. In: Conert EI, Jäger J, Kadereit J, Schultze-Motel W, Wagenitz G, Weber HE, editors. Gustav Hegi: Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Berlin (Germany): Parey. p. 1-108.
21. Jürgens AH, Seitz B, Kowarik I. 2007. Genetic differentiation of Rosa canina L. at regional and continental scales. Plant Syst Evol. 269:39-53. (Pubitemid 350080255)
22. Keller R. 1931. Synopsis Rosarum spontanearum Europae mediae. Denkschr Schweiz Naturf Ges. 65:795.
23. Kiær LP, Philipp M, Jørgensen RB, Hauser TP. 2007. Genealogy, morphology and fitness of spontaneous hybrids between wild and cultivated chicory (Cichorium intybus). Heredity. 99:112-120. (Pubitemid 47013412)
24. Koopman WJM, Wissemann V, De Cock K, Van Huylenbroeck J, De Riek J, Sabatlno GJH, Visser D, Vosman B, Ritz CM, Maes B, et al. 2008. AFLP markers as a tool to reconstruct complex relationships: a case study in Rosa (Rosaceae). Am J Bot. 95:353-366. (Pubitemid 351439328)
25. Kovarik A, Werlemark G, Leitch AR, Souckova-Skalicka K, Lim YK, Khaitova L, Koukalova B, Nybom H. 2008. The asymmetric meiosis in pentaploid dogroses (Rosa sect. Caninae) is associated with a skewed distribution of rRNA gene families in the gametes. Heredity. 101:359-367.
26. Lim KY, Werlemark G, Matyasek R, Bringloe JB, Sieber V, El Mokadem H, Meynet J, Hemming J, Leitch AR, Roberts AV. 2005. Evolutionary implications of permanent odd polyploidy in the stable sexual, pentaploid of Rosa canina L. Heredity. 94:501-506. (Pubitemid 40641172)
27. Nybom H, Esselink GD, Werlemark G, Leus L, Vosman B. 2006. Unique genomic configuration revealed by microsatellite DNA in polyploid dogroses, Rosa sect. Caninae. J Evol Biol. 19:635-648.
28. Nybom H, Esselink GD, Werlemark G, Vosman B. 2004. Microsatellite DNA marker inheritance indicates preferential pairing between 2 highly homologous genomes in polyploid and hemisexual dog-roses, Rosa L. sect. Caninae DC. Heredity. 92:139-150.
29. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 29:467-501. (Pubitemid 29033040)
30. Rieseberg LH. 1997. Hybrid origins of plant species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 28:359-389. (Pubitemid 28012297)
31. Rieseberg LH, Carney SE. 1998. Plant hybridization. New Phytol. 140:599-624.
32. Ritz CM, Schmuths H, Wissemann V. 2005. Evolution by reticulation: European dogroses originated by multiple hybridization across the genus Rosa. J Hered. 96:4-14.
33. Ritz CM, Wissemann V. 2003. Male correlated non-matroclinal character inheritance in reciprocal hybrids of Rosa section Caninae (DC) Ser. (Rosaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 241:213-221.
34. Roberts A. 1975. The nature and taxonomic significance of the system of inheritance in Rosa nanothamnus (Rosaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 71:59-66.
35. Schanzer IA, Vagina AV. 2007. ISSR (Inter Simple Sequence Repeat) markers reveal natural intersectional hybridization in wild roses [Rosa L., sect. Caninae (DC.) Ser. and sect. Cinnamomeae (DC.) Ser.]. Wulfenia. 14:1-14. (Pubitemid 350246465)
36. Simillion C, Vandepoele K, Van Montagu MCE, Zabeau M, Van de Peer Y. 2002. The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 99:13627-13632. (Pubitemid 35215431)
37. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2009. The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 60:561-588.
38. Täckholm G. 1920. On the cytology of the genus Rosa. A preliminary note. Svensk Bot Tidskr. 14:300-311.
39. Täckholm G. 1922. Zytologische Studien über die Gattung Rosa. Acta Horti Berg. 7:97-381.
40. Werlemark G. 2000. Evidence of apomixis in hemisexual dogroses, Rosa section Caninae. Sex Plant Reprod. 12:353-359. (Pubitemid 30454124)
41. Werlemark G, Nybom H. 2001. Skewed distribution of morphological character scores and molecular markers in three interspecific crosses in Rosa section Caninae. Hereditas. 134:1-13. (Pubitemid 32725194)
42. Werlemark G, Uggla M, Nybom H. 1999. Morphological and RAPD markers show a highly skewed distribution in a pair of reciprocal crosses between hemisexual dogrose species, Rosa sect. Caninae. Theor Appl Genet. 98:557-563.
43. Wissemann V. 1999. Genetic constitution of Rosa sect. Caninae (R. canina, R. jundzilli) and sect. Gallicanae (R. gallica). J Appl Bot. 73:191-196.
44. Wissemann V. 2000. Epicuticular wax morphology and the taxonomy of Rosa (section Caninae, subsection Rubiginosae). Plant Syst Evol. 221:107-112.
45. Wissemann V, Hellwig FH. 1997. Reproduction and hybridisation in the genus Rosa section Caninae (Ser.) Rehd. Bot Acta. 110:251-256. (Pubitemid 27295521)
46. Wissemann V, Ritz CM. 2007. Evolutionary patterns and processes in the genus Rosa (Rosaceae) and their implications for host-parasite co-evolution. Plant Syst Evol. 266:78-89.
47. Wulff HD. 1954. Über das spontane Auftreten einer Canina-Meiosis bei der Mikrosporogenese der diploiden Rosa ruga Lindl. Oesterr Bot Z. 101:539-557.
48. Yokoya K, Roberts AV, Mottley J, Lewis R, Brandham PE. 2000. Nuclear DNA amounts in roses. Ann Bot. 85:557-561.