How do social networks and faculty development courses affect clinical supervisors' adoption of a medical education innovation? an exploratory study

Academic Medicine

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 398-404

  Jippes, Erik ^a   Steinert, Yvonne ^b   Pols, Jan ^a   Achterkamp, Marjolein C ^c   Van Engelen, Jo M L ^c   Brand, Paul L P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874948794     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: 1938808X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318280d9db     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1984.
2. McLean M, Cilliers F, Van Wyk JM. Faculty development: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Med Teach. 2008;30:555-584.
3. Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME guide no. 8. Med Teach. 2006;28:497-526.
4. Rogers EM. Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addict Behav. 2002;27:989-993.
5. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82:581-629.
6. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
7. Baldwin T, Bedell M, Johnson J. The social fabric of a team-based MBA program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Acad Man J. 1997;40:1369.
8. Brass D. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Adm Sci Q. 1984;29:518-539.
9. Van Der Hem-Stokroos HH, Scherpbier AJ, Van Der Vleuten CP, De Vries H, Haarman HJ. How effective is a clerkship as a learning environment? Med Teach. 2001;23:599-604.
10. Busari JO, Weggelaar NM, Knottnerus AC, Greidanus PM, Scherpbier AJ. How medical residents perceive the quality of supervision provided by attending doctors in the clinical setting. Med Educ. 2005;39:696-703.
11. Royal Dutch Medical Association-Koninklijke Nederlandsche Maatschappij tot Bevordering, der Geneeskunst. Resolution (kaderbesluit) CCMS 2009 [in Dutch]. http://knmg.artsennet.nl/Opleiding-en-Registratie/CGS-1/Regelgeving/ Huidigeregelgeving-CCMS.htm. Accessed November 29, 2012.
12. Scheele F, Teunissen P, Van Luijk S, et al. Introducing competency-based postgraduate medical education in the Netherlands. Med Teach. 2008;30:248-253.
13. Pendleton D, Schofield D, Tate P, Havelock P. The New Consultation: Developing Doctor-Patient Communication. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003.
14. Jippes E, Van Luijk SJ, Pols J, Achterkamp MC, Brand PL, van Engelen JM. Facilitators and barriers to a nationwide implementation of competency-based postgraduate medical curricula: A qualitative study. Med Teach. 2012;34:e589-e602.
15. Cohen J, West SG, Cohen P. Applied Multiple Regression: Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002.
16. Jippes E, Achterkamp MC, Brand PL, Kiewiet DJ, Pols J, van Engelen JM. Disseminating educational innovations in health care practice: Training versus social networks. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1509-1517.
17. Jippes E, van Engelen JM, Brand PL, Oudkerk M. Competency-based (CanMEDS) residency training programme in radiology: Systematic design procedure, curriculum and success factors. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:967-977.
18. García-Goñi M, Maroto A, Rubalcaba L. Innovation and motivation in public health professionals. Health Policy. 2007;84:344-358.
19. Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: Past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ. 2011;45:60-68.
20. Boor K, Teunissen PW, Brand PLP. Feedback guidelines in postgraduate medical education [in Dutch]. TMO Neth J Med Educ. 2011;30:43-49.
21. Molenaar WM, Zanting A, van Beukelen P, et al. Designing teacher competencies for medical education [in Dutch]. TMO Neth J Med Educ. 2009:28:201-211.
22. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London, UK: SAGE Publications; 1999.
23. Ibarra H. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Acad Man J. 1993;36:471-501.
24. Baker L, Reeves S, Egan-Lee E, Leslie K, Silver I. The ties that bind: A network approach to creating a programme in faculty development. Med Educ. 2010;44:132-139.
25. Ramani S, Leinster S. AMEE guide no. 34: Teaching in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2008;30:347-364.
26. Steinert Y. Faculty development: From workshops to communities of practice. Med Teach. 2010;32:425-428.
27. Steinert Y, Macdonald ME, Boillat M, et al. Faculty development: If you build it, they will come. Med Educ. 2010;44:900-907.
28. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296: 1094-1102.
29. Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2008;78:153-189.
30. Liberman SA, Liberman M, Steinert Y, McLeod P, Meterissian S. Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback. Med Teach. 2005;27:470-472.
31. Decker D, Wheeler GE, Johnson J, Parsons RJ. Effect of organizational change on the individual employee. Health Care Manag. 2001;19:1-12.
32. Mullen B, Johnson C, Salas E. Effects of communication network structure-Components of positional centrality. Soc Netw. 1991;13:169-185.
33. Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass D. The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Adm Sci Q. 2001;46:121-146.
34. Feeley T. Testing a communication network model of employee turnover based on centrality. J Appl Comm Res. 2000;28:262.