Perceptual metrics for static and dynamic triangle meshes

Computer Graphics Forum

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 101-125

  Corsini, M ^a   Larabi, M C ^b   Lavoue G ^c   Petrik O ^d   Vasa L ^d   Wang, K ^e  

^a ISTI CNR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WEST BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

^e GIPSA LAB   (France)

Author keywords

Categories and Subject Descriptors (according to ACM CCS): Models and Principles H.1.2 : User Machine Systems Human Factors

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; WATERMARKING;

COMPARISON METRICS; COMPARISON RESULT; LOSSY COMPRESSIONS; MESH WATERMARKING; PERCEPTUAL METRICS; POLYGONAL MESHES; PROCESSING ALGORITHMS; USER/MACHINE SYSTEMS;

MESH GENERATION;

EID: 84874936981     PISSN: 01677055     EISSN: 14678659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12001     Document Type: Review

References (158)

1. Aydin T. O., Cadik M., Myszkowski K., Seidel H.-P.,: Video quality assessment for computer graphics applications. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia) 29, 6 (Dec. 2010), Article No. 161: 1-161:12.
2. Alliez P., Cohen-Steiner D., Devillers O., Lévy B., Desbrun M.,: Anisotropic polygonal remeshing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH) 22, 3 (July 2003), 485-493.
3. Barten P. G. J.,: Contrast Sensitivity of the Human Eye and its Effects on Image Quality. SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA, USA, 1999.
4. Bulbul A., Capin T., Lavoué G., Preda M.,: Assessing visual quality of 3D polygonal models. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 28, 6 (November 2011), 80-90.
5. Borouchaki H., Frey P. J.,: Simplification of surface mesh using Hausdorff envelope. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 194, 48-49 (Nov. 2005), 4864- 4884.
6. Bian Z., Hu S.-M., Martin R. R.,: Comparing small visual differences between conforming meshes. In Proceedings of Geometric Modeling and Processing Conference (Tokyo, Japan, 2008), vol. 4975, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 62-78.
7. Bian Z., Hu S.-M., Martin R. R.,: Evaluation for small visual difference between conforming meshes on strain field. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 24, 1 (Mar. 2009), 65-75.
8. Burbeck C. A., Kelly D. H.,: Spatiotemporal characteristics of visual mechanisms: excitatory-inhibitory model. Journal of Optical Society of America 70, 9 (Sep. 1980), 1121-1126.
9. Bulbul A., Koca C., Capin T., Güdükbay U.,: Saliency for animated meshes with material properties. In Proceedings of Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2010), ACM, pp. 81-88.
10. Bensalma R., Larabi M.-C.,: A perceptual metric for stereoscopic image quality assessment based on the binocular energy. Springer Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing (2012), (in press).
11. Bolin M. R., Meyer G. W.,: A perceptually based adaptive sampling algorithm. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH (Orlando, FL, USA, 1998), ACM, pp. 299-309.
12. Bors A. G.,: Watermarking mesh-based representations of 3-D objects using local moments. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15, 3 (Mar. 2006), 687-701.
13. Bosc E., Pepion R., Le Callet P., Koppel M., Ndjiki-Nya P., Pressigout M., Morin L.,: Towards a new quality metric for 3-D synthesized view assessment. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 5, 7 (Nov. 2011), 1332-1343.
14. Barland R., Saadane A.,: Blind quality metric using a perceptual map for JPEG2000 compressed images. In Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing (Atlanta, GA, USA, 2006), IEEE, pp. 2941-2944.
15. Bruce N., Tsotsos J.,: Saliency based on information maximization. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems Conference (Vancouver, Canada, 2006), MIT Press, pp. 155-162.
16. Cheng I., Basu A.,: Perceptually optimized 3-D transmission over wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 9, 2 (Feb. 2007), 386-396.
17. Corsini M., Drelie Gelasca E., Ebrahimi T.,: A multi-scale roughness metric for 3D watermarking quality assessment. In Proceedings of Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services (Montreux, Switzerland, 2005), SPIE, pp. 1-4.
18. Corsini M., Drelie Gelasca E., Ebrahimi T., Barni M.,: Watermarked 3-D mesh quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 9, 2 (Feb. 2007), 247-256.
19. Cerf M., Frady E. P., Koch C.,: Faces and text attract gaze independent of the task: Experimental data and computer model. Journal of Vision 9, 12 (Nov. 2009), 1-15.
20. Chandler D. M., Hemami S. S.,: VSNR: A wavelet-based visual signal-to-noise ratio for natural images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 16, 9 (Sep. 2007), 2284-2298.
21. Cho J. W., Prost R., Jung H. Y.,: An oblivious watermarking for 3-D polygonal meshes using distribution of vertex norms. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 55, 1 (Jan. 2007), 142-155.
22. Campbell F. W., Robson J. G.,: Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. Journal of Physiology 197, 3 (Aug. 1968), 551-566.
23. Cleju I., Saupe D.,: Evaluation of supra-threshold perceptual metrics for 3D models. In Proceedings of Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (Boston, MA, USA, 2006), ACM, pp. 41-44.
24. Cohen J., Varshney A., Manocha D., Turk G., Weber H., Agarwal P., Brooks F., Wright W.,: Simplification envelopes. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH (New Orleans, LA, USA, 1996), ACM, pp. 119-128.
25. Cheng Y. M., Wang C. M.,: An adaptive steganographic algorithm for 3D polygonal meshes. The Visual Computer 23, 9-11 (Sep. 2007), 721-732.
26. Cheng I., Ying L., Daniilidis K., Basu A.,: Robust and scalable transmission of arbitrary 3D models over wireless networks. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing 2008 (Jan. 2008), 1-14.
27. Daly S.,: The visible differences predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In Digital Images and Human Vision., A. B. Watson, (Ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, (1993), pp. 197-206.
28. Daly S.,: A visual model for optimizing the design of image processing algorithms. In Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing (Austin, TX, USA, 1994), IEEE, pp. 16-20.
29. Daly S.,: Engineering observations from spatiovelocity and spatiotemporal visual models. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging (San Jose, CA, USA, 1998), vol. 3299, SPIE, pp. 180-191.
30. Donnelly H., Fefferman C.,: Nodal sets of eigenfunctions on Riemannian manifolds. Inventiones Mathematicae 93, 1 (Feb. 1988), 161-183.
31. Drelie Gelasca E., Ebrahimi T., Corsini M., Barni M.,: Objective evaluation of the perceptual quality of 3D watermarking. In Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing (Genoa, Italy, 2005), IEEE, pp. 241-244.
32. Dumont R., Pellacini F., Ferwerda J. A.,: Perceptually-driven decision theory for interactive realistic rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, 2 (Apr. 2003), 152-181.
33. Ebrahimi T.,: Quality of multimedia experience: Past, present and future. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia (Beijing, China, 2009), ACM, pp. 3-4.
34. Fairchild M. D.,: Color Appearance Models (2nd edition). Wiley IS&T, Chichester, UK, 2005.
35. Ferwerda J. A., Ramanarayanan G., Bala K., Walter B. J.,: Visual equivalence: An object-based approach to image quality. In Proceedings of Color Imaging Conference (Portland, OR, USA, 2008), IS&T, pp. 347-354.
36. Ferwerda J. A., Shirley P., Pattanaik S. N., Greenberg D. P.,: A model of visual masking for computer graphics. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH (Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1997), ACM, pp. 143-152.
37. Garland M., Heckbert P. S.,: Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH (Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1997), ACM, pp. 209-216.
38. Guthe M., Müller G., Schneider M., Klein R.,: BTF-CIELab: A perceptual difference measure for quality assessment and compression of BTFs. Computer Graphics Forum 28, 1 (Mar. 2009), 101-113.
39. Garland M., Zhou Y.,: Quadric-based simplification in any dimension. ACM Transactions on Graphics 24, 2 (Apr. 2005), 209-239.
40. Herzog R., Cadik M., Aydin T. O., Kim K. I., Myszkowski K., Seidel H.-P.,: NoRM: No-reference image quality metric for realistic image synthesis. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics) 31, 2 (May 2012), 545-554.
41. Howlett S., Hamill J., O'Sullivan C.,: An experimental approach to predicting saliency for simplified polygonal models. In Proceedings of Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2004), ACM, pp. 57-64.
42. Heu J., Kim C.-S., Lee S.-U.,: SNR and temporal scalable coding of 3-D mesh sequences using singular value decomposition. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 20, 7 (Oct. 2009), 439-449.
43. Hou X., Zhang L.,: Saliency detection: A spectral residual approach. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Anchorage, AK, USA, 2008), IEEE, pp. 1-8.
44. Itti L., Koch C., Niebur E.,: A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 11 (Nov. 1998), 1254-1259.
45. Ibarria L., Rossignac J.,: Dynapack: Space-time compression of the 3D animations of triangle meshes with fixed connectivity. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (San Diego, CA, USA, 2003), Eurographics Association, pp. 126-135.
46. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11: Animation Framework eXtension (AFX). 12419. Core Experiments Description of AFX. Doc. N6988, Hong Kong, China, 2011.
47. Jang E. S., Kim J. D. K., Jung S. Y., Han M., Woo S. O.,: Interpolator data compression for MPEG-4 animation. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 14, 7 (July 2004), 989-1008.
48. Kim K., Barni M., Tan H. Z.,: Roughness-adaptive 3-D watermarking based on masking effect of surface roughness. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 5, 4 (Dec. 2010), 721-733.
49. Keelan B. W.,: Handbook of Image Quality: Characterization and Prediction. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
50. Kelly D. H.,: Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatiotemporal threshold surface. Journal of Optical Society of America 69, 10 (Oct. 1979), 1340-1349.
51. Křivánek J., Ferwerda J. A., Bala K.,: Effects of global illumination approximations on material appearance. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 4 (July 2010), 112:1-112:10.
52. Karni Z., Gotsman C.,: Spectral compression of mesh geometry. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH (New Orleans, LA, USA, 2000), ACM, pp. 279-286.
53. Karni Z., Gotsman C.,: Compression of soft-body animation sequences. Computers & Graphics 28, 1 (Feb. 2004), 25-34.
54. Karunasekera S. A., Kingsbury N. G.,: A distortion measure for blocking artifacts in images based on human visual sensitivity. In Proceedings of Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (Cambridge, MA, USA, 1993), vol. 2094, SPIE, pp. 474-486.
55. Kim S., Kim S., Kim C.,: Discrete differential error metric for surface simplification. In Proceedings of Pacific Graphics (Beijing, China, 2002), IEEE, pp. 276-283.
56. Klein R., Liebich G., Straßer W.,: Mesh reduction with error control. In Proceedings of IEEE/ACM Visualization Conference (San Francisco, CA, USA, 1996), IEEE, pp. 311-318.
57. Kammoun A., Payan F., Antonini M.,: Bit allocation for spatio-temporal wavelet coding of animated semi-regular meshes. In Proceedings of International Multimedia Modeling Conference (Sophia Antipolis, France, 2009), vol. 5371, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 128-139.
58. Kanan C., Tong M., Zhang L., Cottrell G.,: SUN: Top-down saliency using natural statistics. Visual Cognition 17, 6-7 (Aug. 2009), 979-1003.
59. Kutter M., Winkler S.,: A vision-based masking model for spread-spectrum image watermarking. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 11, 1 (Jan. 2002), 16-25.
60. Lavoué G.,: A local roughness measure for 3D meshes and its application to visual masking. ACM Trans. on Applied Perception 5, 4 (Jan. 2009), Article No. 21: 1-21:23.
61. Lavoué G.,: A multiscale metric for 3D mesh visual quality assessment. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Symposium on Geometry Processing) 30, 5 (Aug. 2011), 1427-1437.
62. Larabi M.-C., Brodbeck V., Fernandez C.,: A novel approach for constructing an achromatic contrast sensitivity function by matching. In Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing (Atlanta, GA, USA, 2006), IEEE, pp. 441-441.
63. Lavoué G., Corsini M.,: A comparison of perceptually-based metrics for objective evaluation of geometry processing. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 12, 7 (Nov. 2010), 636-649.
64. Lavoué G., Drelie Gelasca E., Dupont F., Baskurt A., Ebrahimi T.,: Perceptually driven 3D distance metrics with application to watermarking. In Proceedings of Conference on Applications of Digital Image Processing (San Jose, CA, USA, 2006), vol. 6312, SPIE, p. 63120L.
65. Lavoué G., Denis F., Dupont F.,: Subdivision surface watermarking. Computers & Graphics 31, 3 (Jun. 2007), 480-492.
66. Lengyel J. E.,: Compression of time-dependent geometry. In Proceedings of Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (Atlanta, GA, USA, 1999), ACM, pp. 89-95.
67. Luebke D. P., Hallen B.,: Perceptually-driven simplification for interactive rendering. In Proceedings of Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques (London, UK, 2001), Springer-Verlag, pp. 223-234.
68. Lindstrom P.,: Model Simplification Using Image and Geometry-Based Metrics. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA, Nov. 2000.
69. Lee P.-F., Kao C.-K., Tseng J.-L., Jong B.-S., Lin T.-W.,: 3D animation compression using affine transformation matrix and principal component analysis. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E90-D, 7 (Jul. 2007), 1073-1084.
70. Lee H., Lavoué G., Dupont F.,: Rate-distortion optimization for progressive compression of 3D mesh with color attributes. The Visual Computer 28, 2 (May 2012), 137-153.
71. Larkin M., O'Sullivan C.,: Perception of simplification artifacts for animated characters. In Proceedings of Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (Toulouse, France, 2011), ACM, pp. 93-100.
72. Liu Y., Prabhakaran B., Guo X.,: A robust spectral approach for blind watermarking of manifold surfaces. In Proceedings of Workshop on Multimedia and Security (Oxford, UK, 2008), ACM, pp. 43-52.
73. Lindstrom P., Turk G.,: Fast and memory efficient polygonal simplification. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization Conference (Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 1998), IEEE, pp. 279-286.
74. Lindstrom P., Turk G.,: Image-driven simplification. ACM Transactions on Graphics 19, 3 (Jul. 2000), 204-241.
75. Lubin J.,: The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance. In Digital Images and Human Vision, A. B. Watson, (Ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, (1993), pp. 163-178.
76. Lubin J.,: A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation. In Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, E. Peli, (Ed.). World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, (1995), pp. 245-283.
77. Lee C. H., Varshney A., Jacobs D. W.,: Mesh saliency. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH) 24, 3 (Jul. 2005), 659-666.
78. Lévy B., Zhang H.,: Spectral mesh processing. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia Course Notes (Seoul, Korea, 2010), ACM, pp. 1-47.
79. Menzel N., Guthe M.,: Towards perceptual simplification of models with arbitrary materials. Computer Graphics Forum 29, 7 (Sep. 2010), 2261-2270.
80. Movshon T., Kiorpes L.,: Analysis of the development of spatial sensitivity in monkey and human infants. Journal of Optical Society of America A 5, 12 (Dec. 1988), 2166-2172.
81. Muijs R., Kirenko I.,: A no-reference blocking artifact measure for adaptive video processing. In Proceedings of European Signal Processing Conference (Antalya, Turkey, 2005), pp. 1-4.
82. Mantiuk R., Myszkowski K., Seidel H.-P.,: Visible difference predicator for high dynamic range images. In Proceedings of International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (The Hague, The Netherlands, 2004), IEEE, pp. 2763-2769.
83. McDonnell R., Newell F., O'Sullivan C.,: Smooth movers: Perceptually guided human motion simulation. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (San Diego, CA, USA, 2007), Eurographics Association, pp. 259-269.
84. Marat S., Phuoc T., Granjon L., Guyader N., Pellerin D., Guerin-Dugue A.,: Modelling spatio-temporal saliency to predict gaze direction for short videos. International Journal of Computer Vision 82, 3 (Apr. 2009), 231-243.
85. Mannos J. L., Sakrison D. J.,: The effects of visual fidelity criterion on the encoding of images. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 20, 4 (Jul. 1974), 525-536.
86. Müller K., Smolic A., Kautzner M., Eisert P., Wiegand T.,: Predictive compression of dynamic 3D meshes. In Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing (Genoa, Italy, 2005), vol. 1, IEEE, pp. 621-624.
87. Müller K., Smolic A., Kautzner M., Eisert P., Wiegand T.,: Rate-distortion-optimized predictive compression of dynamic 3D mesh sequences. Signal Processing: Image Communication 21, 9 (Nov. 2006), 812-828.
88. Mamou K., Stefanoski N., Kirchhoffer H., Muller K., Zaharia T., Preteux F., Marpe D., Ostermann J.,: The new MPEG-4/FAMC standard for animated 3D mesh compression. In Proceedings of 3DTV-CON: The True Vision-Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (Istanbul, Turkey, 2008), IEEE, pp. 97-100.
89. Müller K., Smolic A., Kautzner M., Wiegand T.,: Rate-distortion optimization in dynamic mesh compression. In Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing (Atlanta, GA, USA, 2006), IEEE, pp. 533-536.
90. Myszkowski K.,: The visible differences predictor: Applications to global illumination problems. In Eurographics Workshop on Rendering (1998), vol. 98, pp. 223-236.
91. Myszkowski K.,: Perception-based global illumination, rendering, and animation techniques. In Proceedings of Spring Conference on Computer Graphics (Budmerice, Slovakia, 2002), ACM, pp. 13-24.
92. Mamou K., Zaharia T., Prêteux F.,: A skinning approach for dynamic 3D mesh compression. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 17, 3-4 (Jul. 2006), 337-346.
93. Nauge M., Larabi M.-C., Fernandez C.,: A reduced-reference metric based on the interest points in color images. In Proceedings of Picture Coding Symposium (Nagoya, Japan, 2010), IEEE, pp. 610-613.
94. Nauge M., Larabi M.-C., Fernandez C.,: ImQual: A web-service dedicated to image quality evaluation and metrics benchmark. In Proceedings of Conference on Image Quality and System Performance (Burlingame, CA, USA, 2011), vol. 7867, SPIE, p. 786714.
95. O'Sullivan C., Dingliana J., Giang T., Kaiser M. K.,: Evaluating the visual fidelity of physically based animations. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, 3 (Jul. 2003), 527-536.
96. Ohbuchi R., Mukaiyama A., Takahashi S.,: A frequency-domain approach to watermarking 3D shapes. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics) 21, 3 (Sep. 2002), 373-382.
97. Payan F., Antonini M.,: Mean square error approximation for wavelet-based semiregular mesh compression. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 4 (Jul.-Aug. 2006), 649-657.
98. Petitcolas F. A. P., Anderson R. J., Kuhn M. G.,: Attacks on copyright marking systems. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Information Hiding (Portland, OR, USA, 1998), vol. 1525, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 218-238.
99. Pan Y., Cheng I., Basu A.,: Quality metric for approximating subjective evaluation of 3-D objects. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 7, 2 (Apr. 2005), 269-279.
100. Perazzi F., Krähenbühl P., Pritch Y., Hornung A.,: Saliency filters: Contrast based filtering for salient region detection. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Providence, RI, USA, 2012), IEEE, pp. 733-740.
101. Pan F., Lin X., Rahardja S., Lin W., Ong E., Yao S., Lu Z., Yang X.,: A locally adaptive algorithm for measuring blocking artifacts in images and videos. Signal Processing: Image Communication 19, 6 (Jul. 2004), 499-506.
102. Pappas T. N., Safranek R. J.,: Perceptual criteria for image quality evaluation. In Handbook of Image and Video Processing., A. C. Bovik, (Ed.). Academic Press, Burlington, MA, USA, (2000), pp. 669-684.
103. Petřík O., Váša L.,: Finding optimal parameter configuration for a dynamic triangle mesh compressor. In Proceedings of International Conference on Articulated Motion and Deformable Objects (Port d'Andratx, Spain, 2010), vol. 6169, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 31-42.
104. Petřík O., Váša L.,: Improvements of MPEG-4 standard FAMC for efficient 3D animation compression. In Proceedings of 3DTV-CON: The True Vision-Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (Antalya, Turkey, 2011), IEEE, pp. 1-4.
105. Qu L., Meyer G. W.,: Perceptually guided polygon reduction. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14, 5 (Sep. 2008), 1015-1029.
106. Recommendation ITU-T P.910: Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications, 1999.
107. Recommendation ITU-R BT.500-11: Methodology for subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, 2002.
108. Recommendation ITU-R BT.1788: Methodology for the subjective assessment of video quality in multimedia applications, 2007.
109. Reddy M.,: Perceptually Modulated Level of Detail for Virtual Environments. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK, Jul. 1997.
110. Ramanarayanan G., Ferwerda J. A., Walter B., Bala K.,: Visual equivalence: Towards a new standard for image fidelity. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH) 26, 3 (Jul. 2007), Article No. 76: 1-76:11.
111. Rogowitz B. E.,: Are image quality metrics adequate to evaluate the quality of geometric objects? In Proceedings of Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging (San Jose, CA, USA, 2001), vol. 4299, SPIE, pp. 340-348.
112. Roudet C.,: A region-based progressive coding of semi-regular 3-D meshes for view-dependent transmission. In Proceedings of International Conference on Signal Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems (Kuala Lump, Malaysia, 2010), IEEE, pp. 51-59.
113. Ramasubramanian M., Pattanaik S. N., Greenberg D. P.,: A perceptually based physical error metric for realistic image synthesis. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH (Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1999), ACM, pp. 73-82.
114. Rushmeier H. E., Rogowitz B. E., Piatko C.,: Perceptual issues in substituting texture for geometry. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging (San Jose, CA, USA, 2000), vol. 3959, SPIE, pp. 372-383.
115. Rus J., Váša L.,: Analysing the influence of vertex clustering on PCA-based dynamic mesh compression. In Proceedings of International Conference on Articulated Motion and Deformable Objects (Port d'Andratx, Spain, 2010), vol. 6169, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 55-66.
116. Rus J., Váša L.,: Deblocking for dynamic triangle meshes. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (Rome, Italy, 2012), SciTePress, pp. 48-57.
117. Rajashekar U., van der Linde I., Bovik A. C., Cormack L. K.,: GAFFE: A gaze-attentive fixation finding engine. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 17, 4 (Apr. 2008), 564-573.
118. Sheikh H. R., Bovik A. C.,: Image information and visual quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15, 2 (Feb. 2006), 430-444.
119. Schanda J.,: Colorimetry: Understanding the CIE System. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007.
120. Sorkine O., Cohen-Or D., Toldeo S.,: High-pass quantization for mesh encoding. In Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing (Aachen, Germany, 2003), Eurographics Association, pp. 42-51.
121. Safranek R. J., Pappas T. N., Chen J.,: Perceptual criteria for image quality evaluation. In Handbook of Image and Video Processing, A. C. Bovik, (Ed.). Academic Press, Burlington, MA, USA, (2004), pp. 669-684.
122. Silva S., Sousa Santos B., Ferreira C.,: Comparison of methods for the simplification of mesh models using quality indices and an observer study. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging (San Jose, CA, USA, 2007), vol. 6492, SPIE, p. 64921L.
123. Silva S., Sousa Santos B., Ferreira C., Madeira J.,: A perceptual data repository for polygonal meshes. In Proceedings of International Conference in Visualisation (Barcelona, Spain, 2009), IEEE, pp. 207-212.
124. Tian D., AlRegib G.,: FQM: A fast quality measure for efficient transmission of textured 3D models. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia (New York, NY, USA, 2004), ACM, pp. 684-691.
125. Tian D., AlRegib G.,: Batex3: Bit allocation for progressive transmission of textured 3-D models. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 18, 1 (Jan. 2008), 23-35.
126. Taubin G.,: Geometric signal processing on polygonal meshes. In Proceedings of Eurographics State-of-the-Art Reports (Interlaken, Switzerland, 2000), Eurographics Association, pp. 1-11.
127. Torralba A., Oliva A., Castelhano M., Henderson J.,: Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features on object search. Psychological Review 113, 4 (Oct. 2006), 766-786.
128. Torkhani F.,: Perceptual Quality Assessment of Dynamic Meshes. Master thesis, Grenoble INP, France, 2011.
129. Torkhani F., Wang K., Chassery J.-M.,: A curvature tensor distance for mesh visual quality assessment. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision and Graphics (Warsaw, Poland, 2012), vol. 7594, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 253-263.
130. Valette S., Chaine R., Prost R.,: Progressive lossless mesh compression via incremental parametric refinement. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Symposium on Geometry Processing) 28, 5 (Jul. 2009), 1301-1310.
131. Vallet B., Lévy B.,: Spectral geometry processing with manifold harmonics. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics) 27, 2 (Apr. 2008), 251-260.
132. Váša L., Petřík O.,: Optimising perceived distortion in lossy encoding of dynamic meshes. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Symposium on Geometry Processing) 30, 5 (Aug. 2011), 1439-1449.
133. Váša L., Rus J.,: Dihedral Angle Mesh Error: A fast perception correlated distortion measure for fixed connectivity triangle meshes. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Symposium on Geometry Processing) 31, 5 (Aug. 2012), 1715-1724.
134. Váša L., Skala V.,: A spatio-temporal metric for dynamic mesh comparison. In Proceedings of International Conference on Articulated Motion and Deformable Objects (Port d'Andratx, Spain, 2006), vol. 4069, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 29-37.
135. Váša L., Skala V.,: CoDDyAC: Connectivity driven dynamic mesh compression. In Proceedings of 3DTV-CON: The True Vision-Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (Kos, Greece, 2007), IEEE, pp. 1-4.
136. Váša L., Skala V.,: A perception correlated comparison method for dynamic meshes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 2 (Feb. 2011), 220-230.
137. Wandell B. A.,: Foundations of Vision. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA, 1995.
138. Watson A. B.,: The cortex transform: Rapid computation of simulated neural images. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 39, 3 (Sep. 1987), 311-327.
139. Wang Z., Bovik A. C., Sheikh H. R., Simoncelli E.,:, Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity,. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 4 (Apr. 2004), 1-14.
140. Watson A. B., Friedman A., McGaffey A.,: Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH (Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2001), ACM, pp. 213-220.
141. Wu J.-H., Hu S.-M., Sun J.-G., Tai C.-L.,: An effective feature-preserving mesh simplification scheme based on face constriction. In Proceedings of Pacific Graphics (Tokyo, Japan, 2001), IEEE, pp. 12-21.
142. Winkler S.,: Vision Models and Quality Metrics for Image Processing Applications. PhD thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland, Dec. 2000.
143. Wang K., Luo M., Bors A. G., Denis F.,: Blind and robust mesh watermarking using manifold harmonics. In Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing (Cairo, Egypt, 2009), IEEE, pp. 3657-3660.
144. Williams N., Luebke D., Cohen J. D., Kelley M., Schubert B.,: Perceptually guided simplification of lit, textured meshes. In Proceedings of Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (Monterey, CA, USA, 2003), ACM, pp. 113-121.
145. Wang K., Lavoué G., Denis F., Baskurt A., He X.,: A benchmark for 3D mesh watermarking. In Proceedings of International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications (Aix-en-Provence, France, 2010), IEEE, pp. 231-235.
146. Wang K., Lavoué G., Denis F., Baskurt A.,: A comprehensive survey on three-dimensional mesh watermarking. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 10, 8 (Dec. 2008), 1513-1527.
147. Wang K., Lavoué G., Denis F., Baskurt A.,: Hierarchical watermarking of semi-regular meshes based on wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 3, 4 (Dec. 2008), 620-634.
148. Wang K., Lavoué G., Denis F., Baskurt A.,: Robust and blind mesh watermarking based on volume moments. Computers & Graphics 35, 1 (Feb. 2011), 1-19.
149. Wang Z., Simoncelli E. P.,: Reduce-reference image quality assessment using a wavelet-domain natural image statistic model. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging (San Jose, CA, USA, 2005), vol. 5666, SPIE, pp. 17-20.
150. Wang Z., Sheikh H. R., Bovik A. C.,: Objective video quality assessment. In Handbook of Video Databases: Design and Applications., B. Furht, and, O. Marqure, (Eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, (2003), pp. 1041-1078.
151. Wang K., Torkhani F., Montanvert A.,: A fast roughness-based approach to the assessment of 3D mesh visual quality. Computers & Graphics 36, 7 (Nov. 2012), 808-818.
152. Yarbus A. L.,: Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1967.
153. Yu Z., Ip H. H. S., Kwok L. F.,: A robust watermarking scheme for 3D triangular mesh models. Pattern Recognition 36, 11 (Nov. 2003), 2603-2614.
154. Yee Y. H., Newman A.,: A perceptual metric for production testing. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Sketches (Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2004), ACM, p. 121.
155. Yee H., Pattanaik S. N., Greenberg D. P.,: Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics 20, 1 (Jan. 2001), 39-65.
156. Yin K., Pan Z., Shi J., Zhang D.,: Robust mesh watermarking based on multiresolution processing. Computers & Graphics 25, 3 (Jun. 2001), 409-420.
157. Zeng W., Daly S., Lei S.,: An overview of the visual optimization tools in JPEG 2000. Signal Processing: Image Communication 17, 1 (Jan. 2002), 85-104.
158. Zhu Q., Zhao J., Du Z., Zhang Y.,: Quantitative analysis of discrete 3D geometrical detail levels based on perceptual metric. Computers & Graphics 34, 1 (Feb. 2010), 55-65.