Perception of simplification artifacts for animated characters

Proceedings - APGV 2011: ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 93-100

  Larkin, Michéal ^a   O'Sullivan, Carol ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Level of Detail; Perception

Indexed keywords

ANIMATED CHARACTERS; AUTOMATIC MODELS; CHARACTER MODELS; LEVEL OF DETAIL; NOVEL METHODS; OPTIMAL EFFICIENCY; REAL TIME; REAL-TIME ANIMATIONS; SIMPLIFICATION METHOD;

ANIMATION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; VISUALIZATION;

FACE RECOGNITION;

EID: 84855652525     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2077451.2077469     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. CIGNONI, P., ROCCHINI, C., AND SCOPIGNO, R. 1998. Metro: measuring error on simplified surfaces. In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 17, 167-174. (Pubitemid 128467208)
2. COHEN, J., VARSHNEY, A., MANOCHA, D., TURK, G., WEBER, H., AGARWAL, P., BROOKS, F., AND WRIGHT, W. 1996. Simplification envelopes. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, 119-128.
3. DALY, S. 1993. The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. Digital images and human vision 11, 2.
4. GARLAND, M., AND HECKBERT, P. 1997. Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 216.
5. GIEGL, M., AND WIMMER, M. 2007. Unpopping: Solving the image-space blend problem for smooth discrete lod transitions. In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 26, Citeseer, 46-49. (Pubitemid 46481095)
6. HOPPE, H. 1996. Progressive meshes. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, 99-108.
7. HOWLETT, S., HAMILL, J., AND O'SULLIVAN, C. 2004. An experimental approach to predicting saliency for simplified polygonal models. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, ACM, 57-64. (Pubitemid 40290742)
8. LAND, M., AND HAYHOE, M. 2001. In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision research 41, 3559-3565. (Pubitemid 33096274)
9. LEE, C., VARSHNEY, A., AND JACOBS, D. 2005. Mesh saliency. ACM Transactions on Graphics 24, 659-666.
10. LINDSTROM, P., AND TURK, G. 2000. Image-driven simplification. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 19, 3, 241.
11. LINDSTROM, P. 2000. Model simplification using image and geometry-based metrics. PhD thesis, Citeseer.
12. LUEBKE, D., AND HALLEN, B. 2001. Perceptually driven simplification for interactive rendering. In Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques, 223.
13. LUEBKE, D., HALLEN, B., NEWFIELD, D., AND WATSON, B. 2000. Perceptually driven simplification using gaze-directed rendering. University of Virginia Technical Report CS-2000-04.
14. LUEBKE, D. 2003. Level of detail for 3D graphics. Morgan Kaufmann.
15. MACK, A. 2003. Inattentional blindness: Looking without seeing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 180-184.
16. MCDONNELL, R., NEWELL, F., AND O'SULLIVAN, C. 2007. Smooth movers: perceptually guided human motion simulation. In Proceedings of the 2007 Eurographics symposium on Computer animation, Eurographics Association, 269.
17. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, M., PATTANAIK, S., AND GREENBERG, D. 1999. A perceptually based physical error metric for realistic image synthesis. In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, 82.
18. RENSINK, R., O'REGAN, J., AND CLARK, J. 1997. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science 8, 5, 368.
19. RUSHMEIER, H., WARD, G., PIATKO, C., SANDERS, P., AND RUST, B. 1995. Comparing real and synthetic images: Some ideas about metrics. In Proceedings of the Sixth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, Citeseer, 213-222.
20. SCHERZER, D., AND WIMMER, M. 2008. Frame sequential interpolation for discrete level-of-detail rendering. In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 27, 1175-1181.
21. SCHWARZ, M., AND STAMMINGER, M. 2009. On predicting visual popping in dynamic scenes. In Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, ACM, 93-100.
22. TEO, P., AND HEEGER, D. 1994. Perceptual image distortion. In International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, vol. 25, Citeseer, 209-209.
23. WATSON, B., FRIEDMAN, A., AND MCGAFFEY, A. 2001. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, 220.
24. WILLIAMS, N., LUEBKE, D., COHEN, J., KELLEY, M., AND SCHUBERT, B. 2003. Perceptually guided simplification of lit, textured meshes. In Proceedings of the 2003 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, ACM, 121.
25. YARBUS, A., AND HAIGH, B. 1973. Eye movements and vision. Plenum press.
26. YEE, Y., AND NEWMAN, A. 2004. A perceptual metric for production testing. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Sketches, ACM, 121.
27. YEE, H., PATTANAIK, S., AND GREENBERG, D. 2001. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 20, 1, 39-65. (Pubitemid 33604753)