Evaluation of supra-threshold perceptual metrics for 3D models

Proceedings - APGV 2006: Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 41-44

  Cleju, Ioan ^a   Saupe, Dietmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Image based metric; Level of detail; Perceptual metric; Supra threshold perception

Indexed keywords

PALETTES; PERCEPTUAL DISTANCE; REFERENCE MODELS; SUPRA-THRESHOLD PERCEPTUAL MATRIX;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 34250779809     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1140491.1140499     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. BOLIN, M. R., AND MEYER, G. W. 1998. A perceptually based adaptive sampling algorithm. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 98, ACM Press, 299-309.
2. CHANDLER, D. M., AND HEMAMI, S. S. 2003. Suprathreshold image compression based on contrast allocation and global precedence. In Proceedings of SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VIII, B. E. Rogowitz and T. N. Pappas, Eds., vol. 5007, SPIE, 73-86.
3. CHENG, I., AND BOULANGER, P. 2005. A 3d perceptual metric using just-noticeable-difference. In Eurographics Short Presentations, 97-100.
4. CHENG, I., BASU, A., AND WANG, T. 2005. Balanced incomplete designs for 3d perceptual quality estimation. In International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 1, IEEE, 617-620.
5. CIGNONI, P., ROCCHINI, C., AND SCOPIGNO, R. 1998. Metro: Measuring error on simplified surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum 17, 2, 167-174.
6. FALMAGNE, J.-C. 1985. Elements of Psychophysical Theory. Claredon Press.
7. GARLAND, M., AND HECKBERT, P. S. 1997. Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 97, ACM Press / Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 209-216.
8. KRANTZ, D. H., LUCE, R. D., SUPPES, P., AND TVERSKY, A. 1971. Foundations of Measurement, vol. 1. Academic Press.
9. LINDMAN, H. R. 1991. Analysis of Variance in Experimental Design. Springer-Verlag.
10. LINDSTROM, P., AND TURK, G. 2000. Image-driven simplification. ACM Transactions on Graphics 19, 3, 204-241.
11. LINDSTROM, P. 2000. Model Simplification using Image and Geometry-Based Metrics, PhD thesis, Georgia Tech.
12. LIJEBKE, D., AND HALLEN, B. 2001. Perceptually driven simplification for interactive rendering. In Proceedings of the 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques, Springer-Verlag, 223-234.
13. LUEBKE, D., REDDY, M., COHEN, J., VARSHNEY, A., WATSON, B., AND HUEBNER, R. 2002. Level of Detail for 3D Graphics. Morgan Kaufmann.
14. MALONEY, L. T., AND YANG, J. N. 2003. Maximum likelihood difference scaling. Journal of Vision 3, 8, 573-585.
15. REDDY, M. 1997. Perceptually Modulated Level of Detail for Virtual Environments, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
16. REDDY, M. 2001. Perceptually optimized 3d graphics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21, 5, 68-75.
17. ROGOWITZ, B. E., AND RUSHMEIER, H. E. 2001. Are image quality metrics adequate to evaluate the quality of geometric objects? In Proceedings of SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VI, SPIE, B. E. Rogowitz and T. N. Pappas, Eds., vol. 4299, 340-348.
18. RUSHMEIER, H., ROGOWITZ, B., AND PIATKO, C. 2000. Perceptual issues in substituting texture for geometry. In Proceedings of SPIE Human Vision and Electronic V, vol. 3959, SPIE, 372-383.
19. SUPPES, P., KRANTZ, D. H., LUCE, R. D., AND TVERSKY, A. 1989. Foundations of Measurement, vol. 2. Academic Press.
20. WANG, Z., BOVIK, A. C., SHEIKH, H. R., AND SIMONCELLI, E. P. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 4, 600-612.
21. WATSON, B., FRIEDMAN, A., AND MCGAFFEY, A. 2001. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2001, ACM Press, ACM, 213-220.