A fast roughness-based approach to the assessment of 3D mesh visual quality

Computers and Graphics (Pergamon)

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 808-818

  Wang, Kai ^a   Torkhani, Fakhri ^a   Montanvert, Annick ^a  

^a GIPSA LAB   (France)

Author keywords

Human visual system; Objective perceptual metric; Surface roughness; Triangle mesh; Visual quality assessment

Indexed keywords

MESH GENERATION;

GAUSSIAN CURVATURES; HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEM; OPTIMUM QUANTIZATION; PERCEPTUAL DISTANCE; PERCEPTUAL METRICS; TRIANGLE MESH; VISUAL DIFFERENCES; VISUAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

EID: 84865622734     PISSN: 00978493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2012.06.004     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (55)

1. M. Botsch, L. Kobbelt, M. Pauly, P. Alliez, and B. Lévy Polygon mesh processing 2010 AK Peters
2. A. Smolic, K. Muller, N. Stefanoski, J. Ostermann, A. Gotchev, G.B. Akar, G.A. Triantafyllidis, and A. Koz Coding algorithms for 3DTV - a survey IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 17 11 2007 1606 1621
3. P. Cignoni, C. Rocchini, and R. Scorpigno Metro: measuring error on simplified surfaces Comput Graph Forum 17 2 1998 167 174
4. Aspert N, Santa-Cruz D, Ebrahimi T. MESH: measuring error between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on multimedia & expo; 2002. p. 705-8.
5. Z. Wang, and A.C. Bovik Mean squared error: love it or leave it? - a new look at signal fidelity measures IEEE Signal Process Mag 26 1 2009 98 117
6. G. Lavoué, and M. Corsini A comparison of perceptually-based metrics for objective evaluation of geometry processing IEEE Trans Multimed 12 7 2010 636 649
7. A. Bulbul, T. Capin, G. Lavoué, and M. Preda Measuring visual quality of 3-D polygonal models IEEE Signal Process Mag 28 6 2011 80 90
8. Garland M, Heckbert PS. Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In: Proceedings of the ACM siggraph; 1997. p. 209-16.
9. D.P. Luebke A developers survey of polygonal simplification algorithms IEEE Comput Graph Appl 21 3 2001 24 35
10. K. Wang, G. Lavoué, F. Denis, and A. Baskurt A comprehensive survey on three-dimensional mesh watermarking IEEE Trans Multimed 10 8 2008 1513 1527
11. Y.-P. Wang, and S.-M. Hu A new watermarking method for 3D models based on integral invariants IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 15 2 2009 285 294
12. P. Alliez, and C. Gotsman Recent advances in compression of 3D meshes N.A. Dodgson, M.S. Floater, M.A. Sabin, Advances in multiresolution for geometric modelling 2003 Springer-Verlag 3 26
13. H. Lee, C. Dikici, G. Lavoué, and F. Dupont Joint reversible watermarking and progressive compression of 3D meshes Visual Comput 27 6-8 2011 781 792
14. K. Wang, G. Lavoué, F. Denis, and A. Baskurt Robust and blind mesh watermarking based on volume moments Comput Graph 35 1 2011 1 19
15. J.W. Cho, R. Prost, and H.Y. Jung An oblivious watermarking for 3-D polygonal meshes using distribution of vertex norms IEEE Trans Signal Process 55 1 2007 142 155
16. G. Lavoué A multiscale metric for 3D mesh visual quality assessment Comput Graph Forum (Proc Symp Geometry Process) 30 5 2011 1427 1437
17. Wang Z, Bovik AC. Modern image quality assessment. Morgan & Claypool; 2006.
18. K. Seshadrinathan, and A.C. Bovik Video quality assessment A.C. Bovik, The essential guide to video processing 2009 Academic Press 417 436
19. P. Lindstrom, and G. Turk Image-driven simplification ACM Trans Graph 19 3 2000 204 241
20. L. Qu, and G.W. Meyer Perceptually guided polygon reduction IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 14 5 2008 1015 1029
21. Bolin MR, Meyer GW. A perceptually based adaptive sampling algorithm. In: Proceedings of the ACM siggraph; 1998. p. 299-309.
22. M. Reddy Perceptually optimized 3D graphics IEEE Comput Graph Appl 21 5 2001 68 75
23. Q. Zhu, J. Zhao, Z. Du, and Y. Zhang Quantitative analysis of discrete 3D geometrical detail levels based on perceptual metric Comput Graph 34 1 2010 55 65
24. Rondao-Alface P, Craene MD, Macq B. Three-dimensional image quality measurement for the benchmarking of 3D watermarking schemes. In: Proceedings of the SPIE electronic imaging, vol. 5681; 2005. p. 230-40.
25. Rogowitz BE, Rushmeier HE. Are image quality metrics adequate to evaluate the quality of geometric objects. In: Proceedings of the SPIE human vision and electronic imaging; 2001. p. 340-8.
26. Karni Z, Gotsman C. Spectral compression of mesh geometry. In: Proceedings of the ACM siggraph; 2000. p. 279-86.
27. Sorkine O, Cohen-Or D, Toledo S. High-pass quantization for mesh encoding. In: Proceedings of the symposium on geometry processing; 2003. p. 42-51.
28. Y. Pan, L.I. Cheng, and A. Basu Quality metric for approximating subjective evaluation of 3-D objects IEEE Trans Multimed 7 2 2005 269 279
29. Drelie Gelasca E, Ebrahimi T, Corsini M, Barni M. Objective evaluation of the perceptual quality of 3D watermarking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on image processing; 2005. p. 241-4.
30. M. Corsini, E. Drelie Gelasca, T. Ebrahimi, and M. Barni Watermarked 3-D mesh quality assessment IEEE Trans Multimed 9 2 2007 247 255
31. Lavoué G, Drelie Gelasca E, Dupont F, Baskurt A, Ebrahimi T. Perceptually driven 3D distance metrics with application to watermarking. In: Proceedings of the SPIE electronic imaging; 2006. p. 63120L.1-63120L.12.
32. Z. Wang, A.C. Bovik, H.R. Sheikh, and E. Simoncelli Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity IEEE Trans Image Process 13 4 2004 1 14
33. Z. Bian, S.-M. Hu, and R.R. Martin Evaluation for small visual difference between conforming meshes on strain field J Comput Sci Technol 24 1 2009 65 75
34. C.H. Lee, A. Varshney, and D.W. Jacobs Mesh saliency ACM Trans Graph (Proc ACM Siggraph) 24 3 2005 659 666
35. Desbrun M, Meyer M, Schröder P, Barr AH. Implicit fairing of irregular meshes using diffusion and curvature flow. In: Proceedings of the ACM siggraph; 1999. p. 317-24.
36. M. Botsch, and O. Sorkine On linear variational surface deformation methods IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 14 1 2008 213 230
37. M. Meyer, M. Desbrun, P. Schröder, and A.H. Barr Discrete differential-geometry operators for triangulated 2-manifolds H.-C. Hege, K. Polthier, Visualization and mathematics III 2003 Springer-Verlag 35 57
38. M. Reuter, F.-E. Wolter, and N. Peinecke Laplace-Beltrami spectra as 'Shape-DNA' of surfaces and solids Comput Aided Des 38 4 2006 342 366
39. B. Vallet, and B. Lévy Spectral geometry processing with manifold harmonics Comput Graph Forum (Proc Eurograph) 27 2 2008 251 260
40. O. Sorkine Differential representations for mesh processing Comput Graph Forum 25 4 2006 789 807
41. Liu Y, Prabhakaran B, Guo X. A robust spectral approach for blind watermarking of manifold surfaces. In: Proceedings of the ACM workshop on multimedia and security; 2008. p. 43-52.
42. Wang K, Luo M, Bors AG, Denis F. Blind and robust mesh watermarking using manifold harmonics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on image processing; 2009. p. 3657-60.
43. H.G. Burchard, J.A. Ayers, W.H. Frey, and N.S. Sapidis Approximation with aesthetic constraints N.S. Sapidis, Designing fair curves and surfaces: shape quality in geometric modeling and computer-aided design 1994 SIAM 3 28
44. B.G. Breitmeyer Visual masking: past accomplishments, present status, future developments Adv Cogn Psychol 3 1-2 2007 9 20
45. Teo PC, Heeger DJ. Perceptual image distortion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on image processing; 1994. p. 982-6.
46. H.R. Sheikh, M.F. Sabir, and A.C. Bovik A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms IEEE Trans Image Process 15 11 2006 3440 3451
47. G.D. Legge A power law for contrast discrimination Vis Res 21 4 1981 457 467
48. S. Daly The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity A.B. Watson, Digital images and human vision 1993 MIT Press 179 206
49. G. Lavoué A local roughness measure for 3D meshes and its application to visual masking ACM Trans Appl Percept 5 4 2009 1 23
50. Silva S, Santos BS, Ferreira C, Madeira J. A perceptual data repository for polygonal meshes. In: Proceedings of the international conference in visualization; 2009. p. 207-12.
51. International Telecommunication Union. Methodology for the subjective assessment of video quality in multimedia applications. Recommendation BT.1788; 2007.
52. International Telecommunication Union. Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. Recommendation P.910; 2008.
53. P.G. Engeldrum Psychometric scaling: a tool for imaging systems development 2000 Imcotek Press
54. Botsch M, Steinberg S, Bischoff S, Kobbelt L. OpenMesh - a generic and efficient polygon mesh data structure. In: Proceedings of the OpenSG symposium; 2002. p. 1-5.
55. J. Peng, C.-S. Kim, and C.-C.J. Kuo Technologies for 3D mesh compression: a survey J Vis Commun Image Represent 16 6 2005 688 733