Quantitative analysis of discrete 3D geometrical detail levels based on perceptual metric

Computers and Graphics (Pergamon)

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 55-65

  Zhu, Qing ^a   Zhao, Junqiao ^a   Du, Zhiqiang ^a   Zhang, Yeting ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Human vision system; Levels of detail; Perceptual metric; Quantitative analysis

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFORMS; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS;

2-D DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFORMS; ANALYTICAL METHOD; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY FUNCTION; HUMAN VISION SYSTEMS; LEVELS OF DETAIL; PERCEPTUAL METRICS; QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS; REDUNDANCY MODELS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 75149196650     PISSN: 00978493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2009.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Butler D. Virtual globes: the web-wide world. Nature 439 (2006) 776-778
2. Lin H., and Zhu Q. Virtual geographic environments. In: Zlatanova S., and Prosperi D. (Eds). Large scale 3D data integration-challenges and opportunities (2005), Taylor & Francis (CRCpress), Boca Raton
3. Li D.R., Zhu Y.X., Du Z.Q., and Hong T. Virtual tang-style timber-frame building complex. In: Pan Z.G., Cheok A.D., Haller M., Lau R.W., Saito H., and Liang R.H. (Eds). Advances in virtual reality and tele-existence (2006), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 880-888
4. David L., Reddy M., Cohen J., Varshney A., Watson B., and Huebner R. Level of detail for 3D graphics (2003), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
5. Pan Z.G., Ma X.H., and Shi J.Y. The automatic generation algorithm for models at multiple levels of detail in virtual environment. Journal of Software 7 (1996) 526-531
6. Clark J.H. Hierarchical geometric models for visible surface algorithms. Communications of the ACM 19 (1976) 547-554
7. Hoppe H. Efficient implementation of progressive meshes. Computers & Graphics 22 (1998) 27-36
8. Erikson C, Manocha D, Baxter III WV. HLODs for faster display of large static and dynamic environments. In: Proceedings of the 2001 symposium on interactive 3D graphics. 2001, p. 111-20.
9. Cheng I, Shen R, Yang Y, Boulanger P. Perceptual analysis of level-of-detail: the JND approach. In: Proceedings of the eighth IEEE international symposium on multimedia. 2006, p. 533-40
10. Watson B., Walker N., and Hodges L.F. Supra-threshold control of peripheral LOD. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 23 3 (2004) 750-759
11. Scoggins RK, Moorhead RJ, Machiraju R. Enabling level-of-detail matching for exterior scene synthesis. In: Proceedings of the conference on visualization. 2000, p. 171-78.
12. Seo J, Kim GJ, Kang KC. Levels of detail (LOD) engineering of VR objects. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology. 1999, p. 104-10.
13. Cohen J.D., and Manocha D. Model simplification. In: Hansen C., and Johnson C.R. (Eds). Visualization Handbook (2005), Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford 393-411
14. Ferwerda J. Fundamentals of spatial vision. In: Applications of visual perception in computer graphics. Siggraph '98 Course Notes. 1998, p. 1-27.
15. Shreiner D., Woo M., Neider J., and Davis T. OpenGL programming guide: the official guide to learning OpenGL. 4th ed. (2004), Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston
16. Bradley A.P. A wavelet visible difference predictor. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 8 (1999) 717-730
17. Nadenau M. Integration of human color vision models into high quality image compression. Ph.D Thesis. Lausanne: EPFL; 2000.
18. Reddy M. Perceptually modulated level of detail for virtual environments. Ph.D Thesis. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh; 1997.
19. Antonini M., Barlaud M., Mathieu P., and Daubechies I. Image coding using wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 1 2 (1992) 205-220
20. Nadenau M., Reichel J., and Kunt M. Wavelet-based color image compression: exploiting the contrast sensitivity function. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 12 (2003) 58-70
21. Reddy M. Specification and evaluation of level of detail selection criteria. Virtual Reality 3 2 (1998) 132-143
22. Daly S. The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In: Watson A. (Ed). Digital images and human vision (1993), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
23. Wang Z., Bovik A.C., Sheikh H.R., and Simoncelli E.P. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13 4 (2004) 600-612
24. Garland M, Heckbert PS. Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1997, p. 209-16.
25. O'Sullivan C, Howlett S, McDonnell R, Morvan Y, O'Conor K. Perceptually adaptive graphics. In: Eurographics state of the art reports. 2004, p. 141-64.
26. Lee CH, Varshney A, Jacobs DW. Mesh saliency. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, p. 659-66.