A local roughness measure for 3D meshes and its application to visual masking

ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Lavoué, Guillaume ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

3D mesh; Curvature; Masking; Roughness; Subjective evaluation

Indexed keywords

3D MESH; CURVATURE; MASKING; ROUGHNESS; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION;

DIGITAL WATERMARKING; PAPERMAKING; WATERMARKING;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 60349083707     PISSN: 15443558     EISSN: 15443965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1462048.1462052     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ALLIEZ, P., COHEN-STEINER, D., DEVILLERS, O., LEVY, B., AND DESBRUN, M. 2003. Anisotropic polygonal remeshing. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, 3, 485-493.
2. BOLIN, M. AND MEYER, G. 1998. A perceptually based adaptive sampling algorithm. In ACM Siggraph. 299-309.
3. CAMPBELL, F. AND KULIKOWSKI, J. 1966. Orientation selectivity of the human visual system. Journal of Physiology 187, 437-445.
4. CCIR. 1986. Method for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, recommendation 500-3. In Recommendations and reports of the CCIR, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland.
5. CHOW, M. 1997. Optimized geometry compression for realtime rendering. In IEEE Visualization. 347-354.
6. COHEN-STEINER, D., ALLIEZ, P., AND DESBRUN, M. 2004. Variational shape approximation. In ACM Siggraph. 905-914.
7. COHEN-STEINER, D. AND MORVAN, J. 2003. Restricted delaunay triangulations and normal cycle. In 19th Annu. ACM Sympos. Comput. Geom.
8. CORSINI, M., DRELIE GELASCA, E., EBRAHIMI, T., AND BARNI, M. 2007. Watermarked 3D mesh quality assessment. IEEE Transaction on Multimedia 9, 2 (February), 247-256.
9. DALY, S. 1993. The visible differences predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 179-206.
10. DUMONT, R., PELLACINI, F., AND FERWERDA, J. 2003. Perceptually-driven decision theory for interactive realistic rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, 2, 152-181.
11. ECKERT, M. AND BRADLEY, A. 1998. Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression. Signal Processing 70, 3, 177-200.
12. FERWERDA, J., PATTANAIK, S., SHIRLEY, P., AND GREENBERG, D. 1997. A model of visual masking for computer graphics. In ACM Siggraph. 143-152.
13. HARMON, L. AND JULESZ, B. 1973. Masking in visual recognition: effects of two-dimensional filtered noise. Science 180, 1194-1197.
14. HOWLETT, S., HAMILL, J., AND O'SULLIVAN, C. 2005. Predicting and evaluating saliency for simplified polygonal models. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2, 3, 286-308.
15. ISENBURG, M. AND SNOEYINK, J. 2001. Face fixer: Compressing polygon meshes with properties. In ACM Siggraph. 263-270.
16. JONES, T. R., DURAND, F., AND DESBRUN, M. 2003. Non-iterative, feature-preserving mesh smoothing. In SIGGRAPH '03: ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers. ACM, New York, 943-949.
17. KARNI, Z. AND GOTSMAN, C. 2000. Spectral compression of mesh geometry. In ACM Siggraph. 279-286.
18. KIM, S., KIM, S., AND KIM, C. 2002. Discrete differential error metric for surface simplification. In Pacific Graphics. 276-283.
19. LAVOUÉ, G., DRELIE GELASCA, E., DUPONT, F., BASKURT, A., AND EBRAHIMI, T. 2006. Perceptually driven 3D distance metrics with application to watermarking. In SPIE Applications of Digital Image Processing XXIX. Vol. 6312.
20. LAVOUEÉ, G. AND WOLF, C. 2008. Markov random fields for improving 3D mesh analysis and segmentation. In Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval. 25-32.
21. LEE, C., VARSHNEY, A., AND JACOBS, D. 2005. Mesh saliency. In ACM Siggraph. 659-666.
22. LUEBKE, D. AND HALLEN, B. 2001. Perceptually driven simplification for interactive rendering. In Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques. 223-234.
23. OHBUCHI, R., MUKAIYAMA, A., AND TAKAHASHI, S. 2002. A frequency-domain approach to watermarking 3D shapes. Computer Graphic Forum 21, 3, 373-382.
24. PAN, Y., CHENG, I., AND BASU, A. 2005. Quality metric for approximating subjective evaluation of 3-d objects. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 7, 2, 269-279.
25. QU, L. AND MEYER, G. W. 2006. Perceptually driven interactive geometry remeshing. In I3D '06: Proceedings of the 2006 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics and games. ACM, New York, 199-206.
26. REDDY, M. 2001. Perceptually optimized 3D graphics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21, 5, 68-75.
27. ROGOWITZ, B.E. AND RUSHMEIER, H. E. 2001. Are image quality metrics adequate to evaluate the quality of geometric objects? SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VI 4299, 1, 340-348.
28. RONDAO-ALFACE, P., DE CRAENE, M., AND MACQ, B. 2005. Three-dimensional image quality measurement for the benchmarking of 3D watermarking schemes. In SPIE Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents. 230-240.
29. TAUBIN, G. 1995. A signal processing approach to fair surface design. In ACM Siggraph. 351-358.
30. TIAN, D. AND ALREGIB, G. 2004. Fqm: A fast quality measure for efficient transmission of textured 3D models. In ACM Multimedia. 684-691.
31. UCCHEDDU, F. 2007. Robust and imperceptible watermarking of 3D meshes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florence, Italy.
32. WANG, K., LAVOUÉ, G., DENIS, F., AND BASKURT, A. 2007. Hierarchical blind watermarking of 3D triangular meshes. In IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. 1235-1238.
33. WANG, Z., BOVIK, A., SHEIKH, H., AND SIMONCELLI, E. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 4, 1-14.
34. WATSON, B., FRIEDMAN, A., AND MCGAFFEY, A. 2001. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In ACM Siggraph. 213-220.
35. WILLIAMS, N., LUEBKE, D., COHEN, J., KELLEY, M., AND SCHUBERT, B. 2003. Perceptually guided simplification of lit, textured meshes. In ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics. 113-121.
36. WOLFGANG, R., PODILCHUK, C., AND DELP, E.JUL 1999. Perceptual watermarks for digital images and video. Proceedings of the IEEE 87, 7, 1108-1126.
37. WU, J.-H., HU, S.-M., SUN, J.-G., AND TAI, C.-L. 2001. An effective feature-preserving mesh simplification scheme based on face constriction. In Pacific Graphics. 12-21.