Mechanisms Involved in the Functional Divergence of Duplicated GroEL Chaperonins in Myxococcus xanthus DK1622

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Wang, Yan ^a   Zhang, Wen yan ^a   Zhang, Zheng ^a   Li, Jian ^a   Li, Zhi feng ^a   Tan, Zai gao ^a   Zhang, Tian tian ^a   Wu, Zhi hong ^a   Liu, Hong ^a   Li, Yue zhong ^a  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN 60;

ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE; GENE DELETION; GROEL1 GENE; GROEL2 GENE; HEAT SHOCK; LETHALITY; MYXOCOCCUS XANTHUS; NONHUMAN; PREDATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; TRINUCLEOTIDE REPEAT;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHAPERONIN 60; ESCHERICHIA COLI; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME, BACTERIAL; HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; MYXOCOCCUS XANTHUS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84874780186     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003306     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Lund PA, (2009) Multiple chaperonins in bacteria-why so many? FEMS Microbiol Rev 33: 785-800.
2. Lund PA, (2001) Microbial molecular chaperones. Adv Microb Physiol 44: 93-140.
3. Ranson NA, White HE, Saibil HR, (1998) Chaperonins. Biochem J 333 (Pt 2) (): 233-242.
4. Radford SE, (2006) GroEL: More than Just a folding cage. Cell 125: 831-833.
5. Lin Z, Rye HS, (2006) GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 41: 211-239.
6. Bernal ZLHaRA (2012) Chaperonin-mediated folding of viral proteins. Adv Exp Med Biol 726: 307-324.
7. VanBogelen RA, Acton MA, Neidhardt FC, (1987) Induction of the heat shock regulon does not produce thermotolerance in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev 1: 525-531.
8. Fayet O, Ziegelhoffer T, Georgopoulos C, (1989) The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures. J Bacteriol 171: 1379-1385.
9. Kerner MJ, Naylor DJ, Ishihama Y, Maier T, Chang HC, et al. (2005) Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell 122: 209-220.
10. George R, Kelly SM, Price NC, Erbse A, Fisher M, et al. (2004) Three GroEL homologues from Rhizobium leguminosarum have distinct in vitro properties. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 324: 822-828.
11. Rodriguez-Quinones F, Maguire M, Wallington EJ, Gould PS, Yerko V, et al. (2005) Two of the three groEL homologues in Rhizobium leguminosarum are dispensable for normal growth. Arch Microbiol 183: 253-265.
12. Ojha A, Anand M, Bhatt A, Kremer L, Jacobs WR Jr, et al. (2005) GroEL1: a dedicated chaperone involved in mycolic acid biosynthesis during biofilm formation in mycobacteria. Cell 123: 861-873.
13. Bittner AN, Foltz A, Oke V, (2007) Only one of five groEL genes is required for viability and successful symbiosis in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol 189: 1884-1889.
14. Gould PS, Burgar HR, Lund PA, (2007) Homologous cpn60 genes in Rhizobium leguminosarum are not functionally equivalent. Cell Stress Chaperones 12: 123-131.
15. Li J, Wang Y, Zhang CY, Zhang WY, Jiang DM, et al. (2010) Myxococcus xanthus viability depends on groEL supplied by either of two genes, but the paralogs have different functions during heat shock, predation, and development. J Bacteriol 192: 1875-1881.
16. Dworkin M, and Kaiser D. (1993) Myxobacteria II. American Society for Microbiology, Wshington, DC.
17. Shimkets LJ, (1990) Social and developmental biology of the myxobacteria. Microbiol Rev 54: 473-501.
18. Goldman BS, Nierman WC, Kaiser D, Slater SC, Durkin AS, et al. (2006) Evolution of sensory complexity recorded in a myxobacterial genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 15200-15205.
19. Otani M, Tabata J, Ueki T, Sano K, Inouye S, (2001) Heat-shock-induced proteins from Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 183: 6282-6287.
20. Lynch M, Force A, (2000) The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154: 459-473.
21. Qian W, Liao BY, Chang AY, Zhang J, (2010) Maintenance of duplicate genes and their functional redundancy by reduced expression. Trends Genet 26: 425-430.
22. Hu Y, Henderson B, Lund PA, Tormay P, Ahmed MT, et al. (2008) A Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutant lacking the groEL homologue cpn60.1 is viable but fails to induce an inflammatory response in animal models of infection. Infect Immun 76: 1535-1546.
23. Barreiro C, Gonzalez-Lavado E, Brand S, Tauch A, Martin JF, (2005) Heat shock proteome analysis of wild-type Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 and a spontaneous mutant lacking GroEL1, a dispensable chaperone. J Bacteriol 187: 884-889.
24. Kim AI, Ghosh P, Aaron MA, Bibb LA, Jain S, et al. (2003) Mycobacteriophage Bxb1 integrates into the Mycobacterium smegmatis groEL1 gene. Mol Microbiol 50: 463-473.
25. Kovacs E, van der Vies SM, Glatz A, Torok Z, Varvasovszki V, et al. (2001) The chaperonins of Synechocystis PCC 6803 differ in heat inducibility and chaperone activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 289: 908-915.
26. Sato M, Nimura-Matsune K, Watanabe S, Chibazakura T, Yoshikawa H, (2007) Expression analysis of multiple dnaK genes in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. J Bacteriol 189: 3751-3758.
27. Sato S, Ikeuchi M, Nakamoto H, (2008) Expression and function of a groEL paralog in the thermophilic cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus under heat and cold stress. FEBS Lett 582: 3389-3395.
28. Brocchieri L, Karlin S, (2000) Conservation among HSP60 sequences in relation to structure, function, and evolution. Protein Sci 9: 476-486.
29. Bridger WA, Wolodko WT, Henning W, Upton C, Majumdar R, et al. (1987) The subunits of succinyl-coenzyme A synthetase-function and assembly. Biochem Soc Symp 54: 103-111.
30. Dalziel K, (1980) Isocitrate dehydrogenase and related oxidative decarboxylases. FEBS Lett 117 (Suppl):: K45-55.
31. McBride MJ, Zusman DR, (1993) FrzCD, a methyl-accepting taxis protein from Myxococcus xanthus, shows modulated methylation during fruiting body formation. J Bacteriol 175: 4936-4940.
32. Vlamakis HC, Kirby JR, Zusman DR, (2004) The Che4 pathway of Myxococcus xanthus regulates type IV pilus-mediated motility. Mol Microbiol 52: 1799-1811.
33. Wall D, Kolenbrander PE, Kaiser D, (1999) The Myxococcus xanthus pilQ (sglA) gene encodes a secretin homolog required for type IV pilus biogenesis, social motility, and development. J Bacteriol 181: 24-33.
34. Jakovljevic V, Leonardy S, Hoppert M, Sogaard-Andersen L, (2008) PilB and PilT are ATPases acting antagonistically in type IV pilus function in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 190: 2411-2421.
35. Thomasson B, Link J, Stassinopoulos AG, Burke N, Plamann L, et al. (2002) MglA, a small GTPase, interacts with a tyrosine kinase to control type IV pili-mediated motility and development of Myxococcus xanthus. Mol Microbiol 46: 1399-1413.
36. Nudleman E, Wall D, Kaiser D, (2006) Polar assembly of the type IV pilus secretin in Myxococcus xanthus. Mol Microbiol 60: 16-29.
37. Orengo CA, Pearl FM, Bray JE, Todd AE, Martin AC, et al. (1999) The CATH Database provides insights into protein structure/function relationships. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 275-279.
38. Houry WA, Frishman D, Eckerskorn C, Lottspeich F, Hartl FU, (1999) Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 402: 147-154.
39. Tyagi NK, Fenton WA, Horwich AL, (2009) GroEL/GroES cycling: ATP binds to an open ring before substrate protein favoring protein binding and production of the native state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 20264-20269.
40. Skjaerven L, Muga A, Reuter N, Martinez A, (2012) A dynamic model of long-range conformational adaptations triggered by nucleotide binding in GroEL-GroES. Proteins 80: 2333-2346.
41. Taguchi H, (2005) Chaperonin GroEL meets the substrate protein as a "load" of the rings. J Biochem 137: 543-549.
42. Krishna KA, Rao GV, Rao KR, (2007) Chaperonin GroEL: structure and reaction cycle. Curr Protein Pept Sci 8: 418-425.
43. Azem A, Kessel M, Goloubinoff P, (1994) Characterization of a functional GroEL14(GroES7)2 chaperonin hetero-oligomer. Science 265: 653-656.
44. Braig K, Otwinowski Z, Hegde R, Boisvert DC, Joachimiak A, et al. (1994) The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A. Nature 371: 578-586.
45. Tang YC, Chang HC, Roeben A, Wischnewski D, Wischnewski N, et al. (2006) Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein. Cell 125: 903-914.
46. Houry WA, (2001) Mechanism of substrate recognition by the chaperonin GroEL. Biochem Cell Biol 79: 569-577.
47. Ohno S (1970) Evolution by Gene Duplication. New York: Springer-Verlag.
48. Zhang J, (2003) Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 292-298.
49. Goyal K, Qamra R, Mande SC, (2006) Multiple gene duplication and rapid evolution in the groEL gene: functional implications. J Mol Evol 63: 781-787.
50. He X, Zhang J, (2005) Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution. Genetics 169: 1157-1164.
51. Kumar CM, Khare G, Srikanth CV, Tyagi AK, Sardesai AA, et al. (2009) Facilitated oligomerization of mycobacterial GroEL: evidence for phosphorylation-mediated oligomerization. J Bacteriol 191: 6525-6538.
52. Hodgkin J, Kaiser D, (1977) Cell-to-cell stimulation of movement in nonmotile mutants of Myxococcus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74: 2938-2942.
53. Bode HB, Ring MW, Schwar G, Kroppenstedt RM, Kaiser D, et al. (2006) 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (CoA) synthase is involved in biosynthesis of isovaleryl-CoA in the myxobacterium Myxococcus xanthus during fruiting body formation. J Bacteriol 188: 6524-6528.
54. Kroos L, Kuspa A, Kaiser D, (1986) A global analysis of developmentally regulated genes in Myxococcus xanthus. Dev Biol 117: 252-266.
55. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ, (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673-4680.
56. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731-2739.
57. Zhang Z, Li J, Zhao XQ, Wang J, Wong GK, et al. (2006) KaKs_Calculator: calculating Ka and Ks through model selection and model averaging. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 4: 259-263.
58. Nei M, Gojobori T, (1986) Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 3: 418-426.
59. Tzeng YH, Pan R, Li WH, (2004) Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 21: 2290-2298.
60. Ewalt KL, Hendrick JP, Houry WA, Hartl FU, (1997) In vivo observation of polypeptide flux through the bacterial chaperonin system. Cell 90: 491-500.