A quality function deployment-based model for materials selection

Materials and Design

Volumn 49, Issue , 2013, Pages 525-535

  Prasad, Kanika ^a   Chakraborty, Shankar ^a  

^a JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Properties of materials (E); Selection of materials (H); Weighting and ranking factors (H)

Indexed keywords

MANUFACTURE; PRODUCT DESIGN; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING;

CONFLICTING OBJECTIVES; CRITERIA WEIGHTS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES; MANUFACTURING ORGANIZATIONS; MANUFACTURING PHASE; MATERIAL SELECTION; MATERIAL SELECTION MODELS; MATERIALS SELECTION; PRODUCT FAILURES; PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS (E); QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENTS (QFD); SELECTION OF MATERIALS; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPES; SOLUTION ACCURACY; SYSTEMATIC METHODOLOGY; TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT; VISUAL BASIC 6.0; VOICE OF THE CUSTOMER; WEIGHTING AND RANKING FACTORS;

QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT;

EID: 84874767345     PISSN: 02613069     EISSN: 18734197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.035     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Edwards K.L. Selecting materials for optimum use in engineering components. Mater Des 2005, 26:469-472.
2. Edwards K.L. Materials influence on design: a decade of development. Mater Des 2011, 32:1073-1080.
3. Rao R.V. A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach. Mater Sci Eng A 2006, 431:248-255.
4. Chan J.W.K., Tong T.K.L. Multi-criteria material selections and end-of-life product strategy: grey relational analysis approach. Mater Des 2007, 28:1539-1546.
5. Zhao R., Neighbour G., Deutz P., McGuire M. Materials selection for cleaner production: an environmental evaluation approach. Mater Des 2012, 37:429-434.
6. Cicek K., Celik M. Multiple attribute decision-making solution to material selection problem based on modified fuzzy axiomatic design-model selection interface algorithm. Mater Des 2010, 31:2129-2133.
7. Ashby M.F. Multi-objective optimization in material design and selection. Acta Mater 2000, 48:359-369.
8. Zhou C.-C., Yin G.-F., Hu X.-B. Multi-objective optimization of material selection for sustainable products: artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach. Mater Des 2009, 30:1209-1215.
9. Karande P., Chakraborty S. Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Mater Des 2012, 37:317-324.
10. Manshadi B.D., Mahmudi H., Abedian A., Mahmudi R. A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method. Mater Des 2007, 28:8-15.
11. Khabbaz R.S., Manshadi B.D., Abedian A., Mahmudi R. A simplified fuzzy logic approach for materials selection in mechanical engineering design. Mater Des 2009, 30:687-697.
12. Athawale V.M., Kumar R., Chakraborty S. Decision making for material selection using the UTA method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2011, 57:11-22.
13. Jahan A., Ismail M.Y., Mustapha F., Sapuan S.M. Material selection based on ordinal data. Mater Des 2010, 31:3180-3187.
14. Chatterjee P., Athawale V.M., Chakraborty S. Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Mater Des 2009, 30:4043-4053.
15. Shanian A., Savadogo O. A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making. Mater Des 2006, 27:329-337.
16. Shanian A., Savadogo O. A methodological concept for material selection of highly sensitive components based on multiple criteria decision analysis. Exp Syst Appl 2009, 36:1362-1370.
17. Chauhan A., Vaish R. Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach. Mater Des 2012, 36:1-5.
18. Rao R.V. A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method. Mater Des 2008, 29:1949-1954.
19. Jahan A., Mustapha F., Ismail M.Y., Sapuan S.M., Bahraminasab M. A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Mater Des 2011, 32:1215-1221.
20. Bahraminasab M., Jahan A. Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR. Mater Des 2011, 32:4471-4477.
21. Thakker A., Jarvis J., Buggy M., Sahed A. A novel approach to materials selection strategy case study: wave energy extraction impulse turbine blade. Mater Des 2008, 29:1973-1980.
22. Rao R.V., Davim J.P. A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2008, 35:751-760.
23. Rathod M.K., Kanzaria H.V. A methodological concept for phase change material selection based on multiple criteria decision analysis with and without fuzzy environment. Mater Des 2011, 32:3578-3585.
24. Jee D.-H., Kang K.-J. A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory. Mater Des 2000, 21:199-206.
25. Chatterjee P., Athawale V.M., Chakraborty S. Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Mater Des 2011, 32:851-860.
26. Chatterjee P., Chakraborty S. Material selection using preferential ranking methods. Mater Des 2012, 35:384-393.
27. Maity S.R., Chatterjee P., Chakraborty S. Cutting tool material selection using grey complex proportional assessment method. Mater Des 2012, 36:372-378.
28. Fatchurrohman N., Sulaiman S., Sapuan S.M., Ariffin M.K.A., Baharudin B.T.H.T. A new concurrent engineering - multi criteria decision making technique for conceptual design selection. Appl Mech Mater 2012, 225:293-298.
29. Mayyas A., Shen Q., Mayyas A., Abdelhamid M., Shan D., Qattawi A., et al. Using quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process for material selection of body-in-white. Mater Des 2011, 32:2771-2782.
30. Chakraborty S., Dey S. QFD-based expert system for non-traditional machining processes selection. Exp Syst Appl 2007, 32:1208-1217.
31. Ghahramani B., Houshyar A. Benchmarking the application of quality function deployment in rapid prototyping. J Mater Proc Technol 1996, 61:201-206.
32. Chen L.-H., Ko W.-C. Fuzzy approaches to quality function deployment for new product design. Fuzzy Sets Sys 2009, 160:2620-2639.
33. Dikmen I., Birgonul M.T., Kiziltas S. Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the construction industry. Build Environ 2005, 40:245-255.
34. Erikkson I., McFadden F. Quality function deployment: a tool to improve software quality. Inform Softw Technol 1993, 35:491-498.
35. Chen C.-C. Application of quality function deployment in the semiconductor industry: a case study. Comp Ind Eng 2010, 58:672-679.
36. Viaene J., Januszewska R. Quality function deployment in the chocolate industry. Food Qual Pref 1999, 10:377-385.
37. Jeong M., Oh H. Quality function deployment: an extended framework for service quality and customer satisfaction in the hospitality industry. Int J Hospitality Manage 1998, 17:375-390.
38. Partovi F.Y., Corredoira R.A. Quality function deployment for the good of soccer. Eur J Operl Res 2002, 137:642-656.
39. Chan L.-K., Wu M.-L. Quality function deployment: a literature review. Eur J Operl Res 2002, 143:463-497.
40. Akao Y. Quality function deployment 1990, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. Hauser J.R., Clausing O. The house of quality. Harvard Business Review 1988, 63-73. May-June.
42. Chan L.-K., Wu M.-L. A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example. Omega 2005, 33:119-139.
43. Govers C.P.M. What and how about quality function deployment (QFD). Int J Prod Eco 1996, 46-47:575-585.
44. Findik F., Turan K. Material selection for lighter wagon design with a weighted property index method. Mater Des 2012, 37:470-477.
45. Karande P., Gauri S.K., Chakraborty S. Applications of utility concept and desirability function for materials selection. Mater Des 2013, 45:349-358.