Applications of utility concept and desirability function for materials selection

Materials and Design

Volumn 45, Issue , 2013, Pages 349-358

  Karande, Prasad ^a   Gauri, Susanta Kumar ^b   Chakraborty, Shankar ^c  

^a Government Polytechnic   (India)

^b INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE   (India)

^c JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

E. Properties of materials; H. Selection of materials; H. Weighting and ranking factors

Indexed keywords

COST ACCOUNTING;

DECISION MAKING PROCESS; DESIRABILITY FUNCTION; DESIRABILITY FUNCTION APPROACH; EARLY FAILURE; H. WEIGHTING AND RANKING FACTORS; MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES; MATERIAL PROPERTY; MATERIAL SELECTION; MATERIALS SELECTION; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MATHEMATICAL TOOLS; PRODUCT COST; PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS; QUALITY CHARACTERISTIC; SOLUTION ACCURACY;

MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84867806501     PISSN: 02613069     EISSN: 18734197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.067     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Edwards K.L. Selecting materials for optimum use in engineering components. Mater Des 2005, 26:469-473.
2. Ljungberg L.Y. Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Mater Des 2007, 28:466-479.
3. Dweiri D., Al-Oqla F.M. Material selection using analytical hierarchy process. Int J Comput Appl Technol 2006, 26:182-189.
4. Milani A.S., Shanian A., Madoliat R., Neme J.A. The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection. Struct Multidisc Optim 2005, 29:312-318.
5. Shanian A., Savadogo O. TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell. J Power Sources 2006, 159:1095-1104.
6. Thakker A., Jarvis J., Buggy M., Sahed A. A novel approach to materials selection strategy case study: wave energy extraction impulse turbine blade. Mater Des 2008, 29:1973-1980.
7. Rao R.V., Davim J.P. A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2008, 35:751-760.
8. Rathod M.K., Kanzaria H.V. A methodological concept for phase change material selection based on multiple criteria decision analysis with and without fuzzy environment. Mater Des 2011, 32:3578-3585.
9. Chauhan A., Vaish R. Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach. Mater Des 2012, 36:1-5.
10. Jahan A., Bahraminasab M., Edwards K.L. A target-based normalization technique for materials selection. Mater Des 2012, 35:647-654.
11. Rao R.V. A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method. Mater Des 2008, 29:1949-1954.
12. Chatterjee P., Athawale V.M., Chakraborty S. Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Mater Des 2009, 30:4043-4053.
13. Girubha R.J., Vinodh S. Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component. Mater Des 2012, 37:478-486.
14. Jahan A., Mustapha F., Ismail M.Y., Sapuan S.M., Bahraminasab M. A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Mater Des 2011, 32:1215-1221.
15. Bahraminasab M., Jahan A. Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR. Mater Des 2011, 32:4471-4477.
16. Rao R.V. A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach. Mater Sci Eng A 2006, 431:248-255.
17. Shanian A., Savadogo O. A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making. Mater Des 2006, 27:329-337.
18. Shanian A., Savadogo O. A non-compensatory compromised solution for material selection of bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) using ELECTRE IV. Electrochim Acta 2006, 51:5307-5315.
19. Shanian A., Milani A.S., Carson C., Abeyaratne R.C. A new application of ELECTRE III and revised Simos' procedure for group material selection under weighting uncertainty. Knowledge-Based Systems 2008, 21:709-720.
20. Shanian A., Savadogo O. A methodological concept for material selection of highly sensitive components based on multiple criteria decision analysis. Exp Syst Appl 2009, 36:1362-1370.
21. Jiao Q., Lan Y., Guan Z., Li Z. A new material selection approach using PROMETHEE method. Int Con Electronic Mech Eng Inf Tech 2011, 2950-2954.
22. Cao H.J., Liu F., Li C.B., Liu C. An integrated method for product material selection considering environmental factors and a case study. Mater Sci Forum 2006, 532-533:1032-1035.
23. Chan J.W.K., Tong T.K.L. Multi-criteria material selections and end-of-life product strategy: grey relational analysis approach. Mater Des 2007, 28:1539-1546.
24. Zhao R., Neighbour G., Deutz P., McGuire M. Materials selection for cleaner production: an environmental evaluation approach. Mater Des 2012, 37:429-434.
25. Chatterjee P., Athawale V.M., Chakraborty S. Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Mater Des 2011, 32:851-860.
26. Chatterjee P., Chakraborty S. Material selection using preferential ranking methods. Mater Des 2012, 35:384-393.
27. Maity S.R., Chatterjee P., Chakraborty S. Cutting tool material selection using grey complex proportional assessment method. Mater Des 2012, 36:372-378.
28. Maniya K., Bhatt M.G. A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: preference selection index method. Mater Des 2010, 31:1785-1789.
29. Athawale V.M., Kumar R., Chakraborty S. Decision making for material selection using the UTA method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2011, 57:11-22.
30. Karande P., Chakraborty S. Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Mater Des 2012, 37:317-324.
31. Findik F., Turan K. Materials selection for lighter wagon design with a weighted property index method. Mater Des 2012, 37:470-477.
32. Jahan A., Ismail M.Y., Mustapha F., Sapuan S.M. Material selection based on ordinal data. Mater Des 2010, 31:3180-3187.
33. Manshadi B.D., Mahmudi H., Abedian A., Mahmudi R. A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method. Mater Des 2007, 28:8-15.
34. Khabbaz R.S., Manshadi B.D., Abedian A., Mahmudi R. A simplified fuzzy logic approach for materials selection in mechanical engineering design. Mater Des 2009, 30:687-697.
35. Fayazbakhsh K., Abedian A., Manshadi B.D., Khabbaz R.S. Introducing a novel method for materials selection in mechanical design using Z-transformation in statistics for normalization of material properties. Mater Des 2009, 30:4396-4404.
36. Fayazbakhsh K., Abedian A. Materials selection for applications in space environment considering outgassing phenomenon. Adv Space Res 2010, 45:741-749.
37. Mayyas A., Shen Q., Mayyas A., Abdelhamid M., Shan D., Qattawi A., et al. Using quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process for material selection of body-in-white. Mater Des 2011, 32:2771-2782.
38. Cicek K., Celik M. Multiple attribute decision-making solution to material selection problem based on modified fuzzy axiomatic design-model selection interface algorithm. Mater Des 2010, 31:2129-2133.
39. Zhang T.Y., Yang R.C. Application of distance evaluation and its improved algorithms in engineering materials selection. Key Eng Mater 2007, 353-358:2758-2761.
40. Rao R.V., Patel B.K. A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection. Mater Des 2010, 31:4738-4747.
41. Derek W.B. Analysis for Optimal Decisions 1982, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
42. Gupta V., Murthy P.N. An Introduction to Engineering Design Methods 1982, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi.
43. Kumar P., Barua P.B., Gaindhar J.L. Quality optimization (multi-characteristics) through Taguchi's technique and quality concept. Qual Reliab Eng Int 2000, 16:475-485.
44. Kansal H.K., Singh S., Kumar P. Performance parameters optimization (multi-characteristics) of powder mixed electric discharge machining (PMEDM) through Taguchi's method and quality concept. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 2006, 13:209-216.
45. Badkar D.S., Pandey K.S., Buvanashekaran G. Parameter optimization of laser transformation hardening by using Taguchi method and utility concept. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2011, 52:1067-1077.
46. Goyal T., Walia R.S., Sidhu T.S. Multi-response optimization of low-pressure-sprayed coatings through Taguchi method and utility concept. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2012, 10.1007/s00170-012-4049-8.
47. Phadke M.S. Quality Engineering using Robust Design 1989, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
48. Harrington E.C. The desirability function. Ind Qual Control 1965, 21:494-498.
49. Derringer G., Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Eng 1980, 12:214-219.
50. Castillo D.E., Montgomery D.C., McCarville D. Modified desirability functions for multiple response optimization. J Qual Technol 1996, 28:337-345.
51. Wu C.F.J., Hamada M. Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization 2000, Wiley Interscience, New York.
52. Costa N.R., Lourenço J., Pereira Z.L. Desirability function approach: a review and performance evaluation in adverse conditions. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 2011, 107:234-244.