Multiple attribute decision-making solution to material selection problem based on modified fuzzy axiomatic design-model selection interface algorithm

Materials and Design

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 2129-2133

  Cicek, Kadir ^a   Celik, Metin ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; AXIOMATIC DESIGN; DECISION PROBLEMS; GENERIC FRAMEWORKS; INTERFACE ALGORITHM; MATERIAL SCIENCE; MATERIAL SELECTION; MODEL SELECTION; MODEL SET; MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTES;

MATERIALS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 72749126510     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.016     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Rao R.V., and Davim J.P. A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35 (2008) 751-760
2. Shanian A., and Savadogo O. A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision-making. Mater Des 27 (2006) 329-337
3. Shanian A., and Savadogo O. A non-compensatory compromised solution for material selection of bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) using ELECTRE IV. Electrochim Acta 51 (2006) 5307-5315
4. Shanian A., and Savadogo O. TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell. J Power Sources 159 (2006) 1095-1104
5. Rao R.V. A decision-making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method. Mater Des 29 (2008) 1949-1954
6. Wang M.J.J., and Chang T.C. Tool steel materials selection under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 72 (1995) 263-270
7. Liao T.W. A fuzzy multi criteria decision-making method for material selection. J Manuf Syst 15 (1996) 1-12
8. Kulak O., and Kahraman C. Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Inf Sci 170 (2005) 191-210
9. Suh N.P. The principles of design (1990), Oxford University Press, New York
10. Kahraman C., and Cebi S. A new multi-attribute decision-making method: hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design. Exp Syst Appl 36 3 (2009) 4848-4861
11. Kulak O., and Kahraman C. Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach. Int J Prod Econom 95 (2005) 415-424
12. Cebi S, Celik M. Fuzzy Axiomatic design approach of customer satisfaction level on Turkish container ports. In: The 11th IFAC international symposium CEFIS, Istanbul, Turkiye; 2007. p. 221-6.
13. Celik M., Kahraman C., Cebi S., and Er I.D. Fuzzy axiomatic design-based performance evaluation model for docking facilities in shipbuilding industry: the case of Turkish shipyards. Expert Syst Appl 36 1 (2009) 599-615
14. Celik M. A hybrid design methodology for structuring integrated environmental management system (IEMS) in shipping business. J Environ Manage 90 3 (2009) 1469-1475
15. Celik M., Cebi S., Kahraman C., and Er I.D. Application of axiomatic design and TOPSIS methodologies under fuzzy environment for proposing competitive strategies on Turkish container ports in maritime transportation network. Expert Syst Appl 36 3 (2009) 4541-4557
16. Kahraman C., Kaya I., and Cebi S. A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy 34 10 (2009) 1603-1616
17. Celik M., and Er I.D. Fuzzy axiomatic design extension for managing model selection paradigm in decision science. Expert Syst Appl 36 3 (2009) 6477-6484
18. Celik M, Cebi S, Ucal I. Enhancement of multi-criteria analysis within analytical strategic environmental assessment (ANSEA). In: International engineering management conference - IEMC-Europe 2008. Estoril, IEEE International: Portugal; 2009. p. 1-4.
19. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process (1980), McGraw-Hill, NY
20. Kumar S., and Vaidya O. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Operat Res 169 (2006) 1-29
21. Edwards W. How to use multiatribute utility measurement for social decision-making. In: IEEE transaction system, man, and cybernetics, SMC-7. 1977. p. 326-40.
22. Hwang C.L., and Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision-making: methods and applications, a state of the art survey (1981), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
23. Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundation of ELECTRE methods. Theor Decis 31 (1991) 49-73
24. Brans J.P., and Vinke P.H. A preference ranking organization method - the PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making. Manage Sci 31 (1985) 647-656
25. Simpson L. Do decision-makers know what they prefer?: MAVT and ELECTRE II. J Operat Res Soc 47 (1996) 919-929