Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR

Materials and Design

Volumn 32, Issue 8-9, 2011, Pages 4471-4477

  Bahraminasab, Marjan ^a   Jahan, Ali ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

H. Selection for material properties; H. Selection of components; H. Weighting and ranking factors

Indexed keywords

ASEPTIC LOOSENING; FEMORAL COMPONENT; H. SELECTION FOR MATERIAL PROPERTIES; H. SELECTION OF COMPONENTS; H. WEIGHTING AND RANKING FACTORS; MATERIAL SELECTION; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; NEW MATERIAL; NITI SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS; OPTIMAL MATERIALS; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; REVISION SURGERY; SELECTION OF THE BEST; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

DECISION MAKING; MATERIALS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TEXTILE MILLS;

JOINT PROSTHESES;

EID: 79957876576     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: 18734197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.046     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Edwards K.L. Towards an improved development process for new hip prostheses. Mater Des 2008, 29(2):558-561.
2. Grujicic M., et al. Design-optimization and material selection for a femoral-fracture fixation-plate implant. Mater Des 2010, 31(7):3463-3473.
3. Ibrahim A., et al. Processing of porous Ti and Ti5Mn foams by spark plasma sintering. Mater Des 2010, 32(1):146-153.
4. Kurtz S., et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Ser A 2007, 89(4):780-785.
5. Carr B.C., Goswami T. Knee implants - review of models and biomechanics. Mater Des 2009, 30(2):398-413.
6. Sculco T.P. The economic impact of infected joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1995, 18(9):871.
7. Rakhorst G., Ploeg R.J. Biomaterials in modern medicine: the groningen perspective 2008, World Scientific Publishing Company.
8. Completo A., Simões J., Fonseca F. Experimental evaluation of strain shielding in distal femur in revision TKA. Exp Mech 2008, 48(6):817-824.
9. Bureau MN. Biomimetic polymer composites for orthopedic implants. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on advanced biomaterials/biomechanics; 2005.
10. Jahan A., et al. Material screening and choosing methods - a review. Mater Des 2010, 31(2):696-705.
11. Griza S., Reguly A., Strohaecker T.R. Total hip stem failure due to weld procedure and material selection misuse. Eng Fail Anal 2010, 17(2):555-561.
12. Chatterjee P., Athawale V.M., Chakraborty S. Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Mater Des 2009, 30(10):4043-4053.
13. Majumdar A. Selection of raw materials in textile spinning industry using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach. Fibers Polym 2010, 11(1):121-127.
14. Huang H., et al. Multi-criteria decision making and uncertainty analysis for materials selection in environmentally conscious design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2010, 1-12.
15. Jahan A., et al. Material selection based on ordinal data. Mater Des 2010, 31(7):3180-3187.
16. Chatterjee P., Athawale V.M., Chakraborty S. Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Mater Des 2011, 32:851-860.
17. Cicek K., Celik M. Multiple attribute decision making solution to material selection problem based on modified fuzzy axiomatic design-model selection interface algorithm. Mater Des 2010, 31(4):2129-2133.
18. Fayazbakhsh K., Abedian A. Materials selection for applications in space environment considering outgassing phenomenon. Adv Space Res 2009, 45(6):741-749.
19. El-Sheikh H.F., MacDonald B.J., Hashmi M.S.J. Material selection in the design of the femoral component of cemented total hip replacement. J Mater Process Technol 2002, 122(2-3):309-317.
20. Fagan M.J., Lee A.J.C. Material selection in the design of the femoral component of cemented total hip replacements. Clin Mater 1986, 1:151-167.
21. Prendergast P.J., Monaghan J., Taylor D. Materials selection in the artificial hip joint using finite element stress analysis. Clin Mater 1989, 4:361-376.
22. Farag M.M. Materials selection for engineering design 1997, Prentice-Hall, New York.
23. Quigley F.P., Buggy M., Birkinshaw C. Selection of elastomeric materials for compliant-layered total hip arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H: J Eng Med 2002, 216(1):77-83.
24. Jahan A., et al. A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Mater Des 2011, 32:1215-1221.
25. Cicek K., Celik M., Topcu Y.I. An integrated decision aid extension to material selection problem. Mater Des 2010, 31:4398-4402.
26. Rao R.V. A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach. Mater Sci Eng A 2006, 431(1-2):248-255.
27. Dehghan-Manshadi B., et al. A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method. Mater Des 2007, 28(1):8-15.
28. Shanian A., et al. A new application of ELECTRE III and revised Simos' procedure for group material selection under weighting uncertainty. Knowled-Based Syst 2008, 21(7):709-720.
29. Morrison J.B. The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking. J Biomech 1970, 3(1):51-61.
30. Seireg A., Arvikar R.J. The prediction of muscular load sharing and joint forces in the lower extremities during walking. J Biomech 1975, 8(2):89-102.
31. Taylor W.R., et al. Tibio-femoral loading during human gait and stair climbing. J Orthopaedic Res 2004, 22(3):625-632.
32. Novak A.C., Brouwer B. Sagittal and frontal lower limb joint moments during stair ascent and descent in young and older adults. Gait Posture 2011, 33(1):54-60.
33. Hasegawa M., Oki S., Shimada T. Study on the effects of different stair-descending methods on knee angle, joint moment and joint force. J Phys Therapy Sci 2010, 22(1):11-16.
34. Kuster M.S., et al. Joint load considerations in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Brit Vol 1997, 79(1):109.
35. Geetha M., et al. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants - a review. Prog Mater Sci 2009, 54(3):397-425.
36. Long M., Rack H.J. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement-a materials science perspective. Biomaterials 1998, 19(18):1621-1639.
37. Wang K. The use of titanium for medical applications in the USA. Mater Sci Eng A, Struct Mater: Prop Microstruct Process 1996, 213(1-2):134-137.
38. Okazaki Y., Gotoh E. Comparison of metal release from various metallic biomaterials in vitro. Biomaterials 2005, 26(1):11-21.
39. Ramsden J.J., et al. The design and manufacture of biomedical surfaces. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2007, 56(2):687-711.
40. Navarro M., et al. Biomaterials in orthopaedics. J Roy Soc Interf 2008, 5(27):1137-1158.
41. Neailey K., Pond R.C. Metal implants. Mater Des 1982, 3(3):470-478.
42. Williams D.F. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2008, 29(20):2941-2953.
43. Viceconti M., et al. Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. J Biomech 2000, 33(12):1611-1618.
44. Lemaire R. Fatigue fracture of the femoral component in a mobile bearing knee prosthesis. Acta Orthopaed Belg 2010, 76(2):274-281.
45. Teoh S.H. Fatigue of biomaterials: a review. Int J Fatigue 2000, 22(10):825-837.
46. Semlitsch M., Lehmann M., Weber H. New prospects for a prolonged functional life-span of artificial hip joints by using the material combination polyethylene/aluminium oxide ceramic/metal. J Biomed Mater Res 1997, 11(4):537-552.
47. Heimke G., Leyen S., Willmann G. Knee arthoplasty: recently developed ceramics offer new solutions. Biomaterials 2002, 23(7):1539-1551.
48. Greiner C., Oppenheimer S., Dunand D. High strength, low stiffness, porous NiTi with superelastic properties. Acta Biomater 2005, 1(6):705-716.
49. Semlitsch M.F., et al. Joint replacement components made of hot-forged and surface-treated Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy. Biomaterials 1991, 13(11):781-788.
50. Matweb. Material property data; 2010. [cited 30.12.09]. http://www.matweb.com.
51. Dsc FRSFFIMRESCBE, Ceng MIMRJBP. Biomaterials. In: Modern physical metallurgy and materials engineering. 6th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999. p. 394-405.
52. Ryhanen J., et al. Biocompatibility of nickel-titanium shape memory metal and its corrosion behavior in human cell cultures. Mater Res 1997, 35:451-457.
53. Zhu S., et al. Stress-strain behavior of porous NiTi alloys prepared by powders sintering. Mater Sci Eng A 2005, 408(1-2):264-268.
54. Machado L.G., Savi M.A. Medical applications of shape memory alloys. Br J Med Biol Res 2003, 36:683-691.
55. Shabalovskaya S.A. On the nature of the biocompatibility and on medical applications of NiTi shape memory and superelastic alloys. Biomed Mater Eng 1996, 6(4):267-289.
56. Kapanen A., et al. Effect of nickel-titanium shape memory metal alloy on bone formation. Biomaterials 2001, 22(18):2475-2480.
57. Balakrishnan N., et al. Biocompatibility of nitinol and stainless steel in the bladder: an experimental study. J Urol 2005, 173(2):647-650.
58. Es-Souni M., Fischer-Brandies H. Assessing the biocompatibility of NiTi shape memory alloys used for medical applications. Anal Bioanal Chem 2005, 381(3):557-567.
59. Li Y.H., et al. The influence of porosity on corrosion characteristics of porous NiTi alloy in simulated body fluid. Mater Lett 2002, 57(2):448-451.
60. Barrabes M., et al. Mechanical properties of nickel-titanium foams for reconstructive orthopaedics. Mater Sci Eng C 2008, 28(1):23-27.
61. Zhu S.L., et al. Effect of porous NiTi alloy on bone formation: A comparative investigation with bulk NiTi alloy for 15 weeks in vivo. Mater Sci Eng C 2008, 28(8):1271-1275.
62. Entchev P.B., Lagoudas D.C. Modeling of transformation-induced plasticity and its effect on the behavior of porous shape memory alloys. Part II: porous SMA response. Mech Mater 2004, 36(9):893-913.
63. Thierry B., et al. Nitinol versus stainless steel stents: acute thrombogenicity study in an ex vivo porcine model. Biomaterials 2002, 23(14):2997-3005.
64. Itin V.I., et al. Mechanical properties and shape memory of porous nitinol. Mater Charact 1994, 32(3):179-187.
65. Bansiddhi A., et al. Porous NiTi for bone implants: a review. Acta Biomater 2008, 4:773-782.
66. Sadrnezhaad S.K., Hosseini S.A. Fabrication of porous NiTi-shape memory alloy objects by partially hydrided titanium powder for biomedical applications. Mater Des 2009, 30(10):4483-4487.