The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty

Knee

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 15-20

  Lustig, S ^a,b   Fleury, C ^c   Goy, D ^c   Neyret, P ^a,b   Donell, S T ^d  

^a CROIX ROUSSE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Lyon University   (France)

^c Tornier SA   (France)

^d NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D system; Accuracy; Angle; Computer assisted surgery (CAS); Distance; Total knee replacement (TKR)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CAMERA; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFRARED RADIATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDITY;

EID: 78649913833     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bolognesi M., Hofmann A. Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA: a single-surgeon experience. Clin Orthop 2005, 440:162-169.
2. Haaker R.G., Stockheim M., Kamp M., Proff G., Breitenfelder J., Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement on total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2005, 433:152-159.
3. Stulberg S.D. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?. Clin Orthop 2003, 416:177-184.
4. Rosenberger R.E., Fink C., Quirbach S., Attal R., Tecklenburg K., Hoser C. The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16:1133-1140.
5. Jenny J.Y., Boeri C., Picard F., Leitner F. Reproducibility of intra-operative measurement of the mechanical axes of the lower limb during total knee replacement with a non-imaged based navigation system. Comput Aided Surg 2004, 9:161-166.
6. Kim S.J., MacDonald M., Hernandez J., Wixson R.L. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:123-131.
7. Martin A., Wohlgenannt O., Prenn M., Oelsch C., von Strempel A. Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy. Clin Orthop 2007, 460:178-184.
8. Matziolis G., Krocker D., Weiss U., Tohtz S., Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007, 89A:236.
9. Frantz D., Wiles A., Leis S., Kirsch S.R. Accuracy assessment protocols for electromagnetic tracking systems. Phys Med Biol 2003, 48:2241-2251.
10. Fuiko R., Kotten B., Zettl R., Ritschl P. The accuracy of palpation from orientation points for the navigated implantation of knee prostheses. Orthopade 2004, 33:338-343.
11. Nishihara S., Sugano N., Ikai M., Sasama T., Tamura Y., Tamura S., et al. Accuracy evaluation of a shape-based registration method fora computer navigation system for total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2003, 16:98.
12. Bauwens K., Matthes G., Wich M., Gebhard F., Hanson B., Ekkernkamp A., et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007, 89A:261-269.
13. Jenny J.Y., Clemens U., Kohler S., Kiefer H., Konermann W., Miehlke R.K. Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:832-839.
14. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., Beaver R.J. Computer- assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004, 86B:372.
15. Ensini A., Catani F., Leardini A., Romagnoli M., Giannini S. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2007, 457:156-162.
16. Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., Banel D., Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1097-1106.
17. Yau W.P., Chiu K.Y. Cutting errors in total knee replacement: assessment by computer assisted surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16:670-673.
18. Pitto R.P., Graydon A.J., Bradley L., Malak S.F., Walker C.G., Anderson I.A. Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006, 88B:601-605.
19. Huffner T., Kendoff D., Citak M., Geerling J., Krettek C. Precision in orthopaedic computer navigation. Orthopade 2006, 35:1043-1055.
20. Picard F., Laitner F., Gregori A., Martin P. A cadaveric study to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in locating the hip center during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:590-595.
21. Stindel E., Gil D., Briard J.L., Merloz P., Dubrana F., Lefevre C. Detection of the center of the hip joint in computer-assisted surgery: an evaluation study of the Surgetics algorithm. Comput Aided Surg 2005, 10:133-139.
22. Robinson M., Eckoff D.G., Reinig K.D., Bagur M.M., Bach J.M. Variability of landmark identification in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2006, 442:57-62.
23. Yau W.P., Leung A., Liu K.G., Yan C.H., Wong L.L.S., Chiu K.Y. Interobserver and intraonserver errors in obtaining visually selected anatomical landmarks during registration process in non-image-based navigation -assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1150-1161.
24. Lustig S., Lavoie F., Selmi T.A., Servien E., Neyret P. Relationship between the surgical epicondylar axis and the articular surface of the distal femur: an anatomic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16:674-682.
25. Van der Linden-van der Zwaag H.M., Valstar E.R., van der Molen A.J., Nelissen R.G. Transepicondylar axis accuracy in computer assisted knee surgery: a comparison of the CT-based measured axis versus the CAS-determined axis. Comput Aided Surg 2008, 13:200-206.
26. Perrin N., Stindel E., Roux C. Bone morphing versus freehand localization of anatomical landmarks: consequences for the reproducibility of implant positioning in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 2005, 10:301-309.
27. Jazrawi L.M., Birdzell L., Kummer F., Di Cesare P.E. The accuracy of computed tomography for determining femoral and tibial total knee arthroplasty component rotation. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15:761-766.
28. Stöckl B., Nogler M., Rosiek R., Fischer M., Krismer M., Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2004, 426:180-186.
29. Lustig S., Bruderer J., Servien E., Neyret P. The bone cuts and ligament balance in total knee arthroplasty: the third way using computer assisted surgery. Knee 2009, 16:9.
30. Austin S.A., Ghanem E., Joshi A., Trappler R., Parvizi J., Hozack W.J. The assessment of intraoperative prosthetic knee range of motion using two methods. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:515-521.
31. Victor J., Van Doninck D., Labey L., Innocenti B., Parizel P.M., Bellemans J. How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?. Knee 2009, 16:358-365.
32. Siston R.A., Giori N.J., Goodman S.B., Delp S.L. Intraoperative passive knee kinematics of osteoarthritic knees before and after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2006, 24:1607-1614.