Bursting bubbles and bilayers

Theranostics

Volumn 2, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1140-1159

  Wrenn, Steven P ^a   Dicker, Stephen M ^a   Small, Eleanor F ^a   Dan, Nily R ^a   Mleczko, Michał ^b   Schmitz, Georg ^b   Lewin, Peter A ^c  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^c DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cavitation; Liposome; Membrane; Microbubble; Sonoporation; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

1,2 DIOLEOYL PHOSPHOCHOLINE; 1,2 DIPALMITOYL PHOSPHOCHOLINE; CHOLESTEROL; CONTRAST MEDIUM; LIPOSOME; MACROGOL; PERFLUBUTANE; PERFLUTREN; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE; SURFACTANT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; CELL DEATH; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DILATATION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; KINETICS; MICROBUBBLE; MICROCAPSULE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; REVERSE SONOPORATION; REVIEW; SAFETY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION; ULTRASOUND;

CAVITATION; LIPOSOME; MEMBRANE.; MICROBUBBLE; SONOPORATION; ULTRASOUND;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; LIPID BILAYERS; MICROBUBBLES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; ULTRASONICS; UNILAMELLAR LIPOSOMES;

EID: 84874381684     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18387640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7150/thno.4305     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. Postema M, Schmitz G. Bubble dynamics involved in ultrasonic imaging. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 2006; 6: 493-502.
2. Klibanov A. Targeted delivery of gas-filled microspheres, contrast agents for ultrasound imaging. Adv Drug Deilvery Rev. 1999; 37: 139-57.
3. Stride E, Edirisinghe M. Novel microbubble preparation technologies. Soft Matter. 2008; 4: 2350-9.
4. Borden M, Dayton P, Zhao S, Farquhar M. Physico-chemical Properties of the Microbubble Lipid Shell. IEEE International Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Joint 50th Anniversary Conference. 2004; : 20-3.
5. Borden MA, Longo ML. Dissolution Behavior of Lipid Monolayer-Coated, Air-Filled Microbubbles: Effect of Lipid Hydrophobic Chain Length. Langmuir. 2002; 18: 9225-33. doi:10.1021/la026082h.
6. Borden MA, Longo ML. Oxygen Permeability of Fully Condensed Lipid Monolayers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2004; 108: 6009-16. doi:10.1021/jp037815p.
7. Borden MA, Pu G, Runner GJ, Longo ML. Surface phase behavior and microstructure of lipid/PEG-emulsifier monolayer-coated microbubbles. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2004; 35: 209-23. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.03.007.
8. Duncan PB, Needham D. Test of the Epstein-Plesset Model for Gas Microparticle Dissolution in Aqueous Media: Effect of Surface Tension and Gas Undersaturation in Solution. Langmuir. 2004; 20: 2567-78. doi:10.1021/la034930i.
9. Wrenn S, Mleczko M, Schmitz G. Phospholipid-stabilized microbubbles: Influence of shell chemistry on cavitation threshold and binding to giant uni-lamellar vesicles. Applied Acoustics. 2009; 70: 1313-22.
10. Kheirolomoom A, Dayton PA, Lum AFH, Little E, Paoli EE, Zheng H, et al. Acoustically-active microbubbles conjugated to liposomes: Characterization of a proposed drug delivery vehicle. Journal of Controlled Release. 2007; 118: 275-84. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.12.015.
11. Lum AFH, Borden MA, Dayton PA, Kruse DE, Simon SI, Ferrara KW. Ultrasound radiation force enables targeted deposition of model drug carriers loaded on microbubbles. Journal of Controlled Release. 2006; 111: 128-34. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.11.006.
12. Unger E, Masunaga T, McCreery T, Schumann P, Sweitzer R, Quiqley R. Therapeutic applications of microbubbles. Eur J Radiology. 2002; 42: 160-8.
13. Klibanov A. Targeted delivery of gas-filled microspheres, contrast agents for ultrasound imaging. Adv Drug Deilvery Rev. 1994; 37: 139-57.
14. Wu J, Chen D, Pepe J, Himberg BE, Ricn M. Application of liposomes to sonoporation. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2006; 32: 429-37. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.11.019.
15. van Wamel A, Kooiman K, Harteveld M, Emmer M, ten Cate FJ, Versluis M, et al. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: Drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. Journal of Controlled Release. 2006; 112: 149-55. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.02.007.
16. Wu J. Theoretical study on shear stress generated by microstreaming surrounding contrast agents attached to living cells. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2002; 28: 125-9. doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(01)00497-5.
17. Wu J, Ross J, Chiu J. Reparable sonoporation generated by microstreaming. Your access to this publication is provided through the subscription of Drexel University Library Welcome Message Help Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2002; 111: 1460-4.
18. Tlaxca JL, Anderson CR, Klibanov AL, Lowrey B, Hossack JA, Alexander JS, et al. Analysis of in vitro Transfection by Sonoporation Using Cationic and Neutral Microbubbles. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2010; 36: 1907-18. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.05.014.
19. Delalande A, Kotopoulis S, Rovers T, Pichon C, Postem M. Sonoporation at a low mechanical index. Bubble Science Engineering and Technology. 2011; 3: 3-11.
20. Krasovitski B, Frenkel V, Shoham V, Kimmel E. Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108: 3258-63.
21. Karshafian R, Bevan PD, Williams R, Samac S, Burns PN. Sonoporation by Ultrasound-Activated Microbubble Contrast Agents: Effect of Acoustic Exposure Parameters on Cell Membrane Permeability and Cell Viability. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2009; 35: 847-60. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.10.013.
22. Zhou Y, Kumon RE, Cui J, Deng CX. The Size of Sonoporation Pores on the Cell Membrane. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2009; 35: 1756-60. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.05.012.
23. Doinikov A, Bouakaz A. Theoretical investigation of shear stress generated by a contrast microbubble on the cell membrane as a mechanism for sonoporation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 128: 11-9.
24. Marmottant P, Hilgenfeldt S. Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles. Nature. 2003; 423: 153-6.
25. Zarnitsyn VG, Prausnitz MR. Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2004; 30: 527-38. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.01.008.
26. Gruzman H, McNamara A, Nguyen D, Prausnitz M. BIOEFFECTS CAUSED BY CHANGES IN ACOUSTIC CAVITATION BUBBLE DENSITY AND CELL CONCENTRATION: A UNIFIED EXPLANATION BASED ON CELL-TO-BUBBLE RATIO AND BLAST RADIUS. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2003; 29: 1211-22.
27. Schlicher RK, Radhakrishna H, Tolentino TP, Apkarian RP, Zarnitsyn V, Prausnitz MR. Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2006; 32: 915-24. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.02.1416.
28. O'Brien JW. Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 2007; 93: 212-55. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.010.
29. Dialecki D. WFUMB SAFETY SYMPOSIUM ON ECHO-CONTRAST AGENTS: BIOEFFECTS OF ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENTS IN VIVO. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2007; 33: 205-13.
30. Nyborg W. WFUMB SAFETY SYMPOSIUM ON ECHO-CONTRAST AGENTS: MECHANISMS FOR THE INTERACTION OF ULTRASOUND. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2007; 33: 224-32.
31. Hallow DM, Mahajan AD, McCutchen TE, Prausnitz MR. Measurement and correlation of acoustic cavitation with cellular bioeffects. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2006; 32: 1111-22. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.03.008.
32. Abbott J. RATIONALE AND DERIVATION OF MI AND TI-A REVIEW. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 1999; 25: 431-41.
33. Barnett SB, Ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC, Nyborg WL, Maeda K, Bang J. Current status of research on biophysical effects of ultrasound. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 1994; 20: 205-18. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(94)90060-4.
34. Leighton T. The Acoustic Bubble. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc., 1994;.
35. Apfel RE, Holland CK. Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 1991; 17: 179-85. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(91)90125-g.
36. Webb I, Payne S, Coussios C. The effect of temperature and viscoelasticity on cavitation dynamics during ultrasonic ablation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011; 130: 3458-66.
37. Ammi AY, Cleveland RO, Mamou J, Wang GI, Bridal SL, O'Brien WD. Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on. 2006; 53: 126-36.
38. Ammi A, Mamou J, Wang G, Cleveland R, Bridal S, O'Brien W. Determining Thresholds For Contrast Agent Collapse. IEEE International Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Joint 50th Anniversary Conference. 2004; : 346-9.
39. King D, Malloy M, Roberts A, Haak A, Yoder C, O'Brien WD. Determination of postexcitation thresholds for single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles using double passive cavitation detection. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 127: 3449-55.
40. King D, O'Brien W. Comparison between maximum radial expansion of ultrasound contrast agents and experimental postexcitation signal results. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011; 129: 114-21.
41. Tran B, Seo J, Hall T, Fowlkes J, Cain C. Microbubble-Enhanced Cavitation for Noninvasive Ultrasound Surgery. IEEE Trans Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. 2003; 50: 1296-304.
42. Feshitan JA, Vlachos F, Sirsi SR, Konofagou EE, Borden MA. Theranostic Gd(III)-lipid microbubbles for MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Biomaterials. 2012; 33: 247-55. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.026.
43. Wrenn S, Dicker S, Small E, Mleczko M. Controlling Cavitation for Controlled Release. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. 2009; : 104-7.
44. Dicker S, Mleczko M, Hensel K, Bartolomeo A, Schmitz G, Wrenn S. Coencapsulation of lipid microbubbles within polymer microcapsules for contrast applications. Bubble Science Engineering and Technology. 2011; 3: 12-9.
45. Dicker S, Mleczko M, Schmitz G, Wrenn S. Determination of microbubble cavitation threshold pressure as function of shell chemistry. Bubble Science Engineering and Technology. 2010; 2: 55-64.
46. Neppiras E. ACOUSTIC CAVITATION. Physics Reports (Review Section of Physics Letters). 1980; 61: 159-251.
47. de Jong N, Hoff L, Skotland T, Bom N. Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: Theoretical considerations and some measurements. Ultrasonics. 1992; 30: 95-103. doi:10.1016/0041-624x(92)90041-j.
48. de Jong N, Hoff L. Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres. Ultrasonics. 1993; 31: 175-81. doi:10.1016/0041-624x(93)90004-j.
49. Hoff L, Hoff B. Acoustic Properties of Shell-encapsulated, gas-filled ultrasound contrast agents. IeEE Utrasonics Symposium. 1996; : 1441-4.
50. Frinking PJA, de Jong N. Acoustic Modeling of Shell-Encapsulated Gas Bubbles. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 1998; 24: 523-33. doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00009-x.
51. Doinikov A, Dayton P. Spatio-temporal dynamics of an encapsulated gas bubble in an ultrasound field. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 120: 661-9.
52. Church C. The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 97: 1510-21.
53. Vokurka K. Comparison of Rayleigh's, Herring's and Gilmore's Models of Gas Bubbles. Acustica. 1986; 59: 214-9.
54. Morgan K, Allen J, Daython P, Chomas J, Klibanov A, Ferrara K. Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size. IEEE Trans Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. 2000; 47: 1494-509.
55. Chatterjee D, Sarkar K. A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2003; 29: 1749-57. doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(03)01051-2.
56. Scriven L. Dynamics of a fluid interface. Equation of motion for Newtonian surface fluids. Chemical Engineering Science. 1960; 12: 98-108.
57. Djabbarah NF, Wasan DT. Dilational viscoelastic properties of fluid interfaces-III Mixed surfactant systems. Chemical Engineering Science. 1982; 37: 175-84. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(82)80152-8.
58. Kao RL, Edwards DA, Wasan DT, Chen E. Measurement of interfacial dilatational viscosity at high rates of interface expansion using the maximum bubble pressure method. I. Gas-liquid surface. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1992; 148: 247-56. doi:10.1016/0021-9797(92)90133-7.
59. Lopez J, Vogel M, Hirsa A. Influence of coexisting phases on the surface dilatational viscosity of Langmuir monolayers. Physical Review E. 2004; 70: 1-5.
60. Crane J, Putz G, Hall S. Persistence of Phase Coexistence in Disaturated Phosphatidylcholine Monolayers at High Surface Pressures. Biophys J. 1999; 77: 3134-43.
61. Rawicz W, Olbrich K, McIntosh T, Needham D, Evans E. Effect of Chain Length and Unsaturation on Elasticity of Lipid Bilayers. Biophys J. 2000; 79: 328-39.
62. Sández MI, Suárez A, Gil A. Surface Pressure-Area Isotherms and Fluorescent Behavior of Phospholipids Containing Labeled Pyrene. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2002; 250: 128-33. doi:10.1006/jcis.2002.8346.
63. Pétriat F, Roux E, Leroux JC, Giasson S. Study of Molecular Interactions between a Phospholipidic Layer and a pH-Sensitive Polymer Using the Langmuir Balance Technique. Langmuir. 2004; 20: 1393-400. doi:10.1021/la035583f.
64. Stride E. The influence of surface adsorption on microbubble dynamics. Phil Trans R Soc A. 2008; 366: 2103-15.
65. Sarkar K, Shi W, Chatterjee D, Forsberg F. Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 118: 539-50.
66. Shirshendu P, Katiyar A, Sarkar K, Chatterjee D, Shi W, Forsberg F. Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: Strain-softening interfacial elasticity model. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 127: 3846-57.
67. Discher B, Won Y, Ege D, Lee J, Bates F, Discher D, et al. Polymersomes: Tough vesicles made from Diblock Copolymers. Science. 1999; 284: 1143-6.
68. Kim DH, Costello MJ, Duncan PB, Needham D. Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Polycrystalline Phospholipid Monolayer Shells: Novel Solid Microparticles. Langmuir. 2003; 19: 8455-66. doi:10.1021/la034779c.
69. Evans E, Rawicz W. Elasticity of ''Fuzzy'' Biomembranes. Physical Review Letters. 1997; 79: 2379-82.
70. Szleifer I, Gerasimov O, Thompson D. Spontaneous liposome formation induced by grafted poly(ethylene oxide) layers: Theoretical prediction and experimental verification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998; 95: 1032-7.
71. Rovira-Bru M , Thompson D , Szleifer I . S ize a nd S tructure o f Spontaneously Forming Liposomes in Lipid/PEG-Lipid Mixtures. Biophys J. 2002; 83: 2419-39.
72. Marsh D. Elastic Constants of Polymer-Grafted Lipid Membranes. Biophys J. 2001; 81: 2154-62.
73. de Gennes P. Polymers at an interface; a simplified view. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 1987; 27: 189-209. doi:10.1016/0001-8686(87)85003-0.
74. Kenworthy A, Hristova K, Needham D, McIntosh T. Range and Magnitude of the Steric Pressure Between Bilayers Containing Phospholipids with Covalently Attached Poly(ethylene glycol). Biophys J. 1995; 68: 1921-36.
75. Kenworthy A, Simon S, McIntosh T. Structure and Phase Behavior of Lipid Suspensions Containing Phospholipids with Covalently Attached Poly(ethylene glycol). Biophys J. 1995; 68: 1903-20.
76. Dan N. Brush Adsorption from Polydisperse Solutions. Macromolecules. 1994; 27: 2310-2.
77. Marsh D, Bartucci R, Sportelli L. Lipid membranes with grafted polymers: physicochemical aspects. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes. 2003; 1615: 33-59. doi:10.1016/s0005-2736(03)00197-4.
78. Flynn H. Cavitation dynamics. II. Free pulsations and models for cavitation bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am. 1975; 58: 1160-70.
79. Walton A, Reynolds G. Sonoluminescence. Advnaces in Physics. 1984; 33: 595-660.
80. Stride E, Coussios C. Cavitation and contrast: the use of bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy. Journal of Engineering in Medicine (Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers-Part H). 2010; 224: 171-91.
81. Mleczko M, Dicker S, Wrenn S, Schmitz G. influence of microbubble shell chemistry on the destruction threshold of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. Acoustical Imaging. 2012; In Press.
82. Doinikov A, Dayton P. Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2007; 121: 3331-40.
83. Wrenn S, Dicker S, Small E, Maghnouj A, Hahn S, Mleczko M, et al. Microcapsules: Reverse Sonoporation and Long-lasting, Safe Contrast. Acoustical Imaging. 2012; 31: 81-90.
84. Small E, Willy M, Lewin P, Wrenn S. Ultrasound-induced transport across lipid bilayers: Influence of phase behavior. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochem Eng Aspects. 2011; 390: 40-7.
85. Krasovitski B, Kimmel E. Shear Stress Induced by a Gas Bubble Pulsating in an Ultrasonic Field Near a Wall. ieee transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control. 2004; 51: 973-9.
86. Marmottant P, Versluis M, de Jong N, Hilgenfeldt S, Lohse D. High-speed imaging of an ultrasound-driven bubble in contact with a wall: "Narcissus" effect and resolved acoustic streaming. Experiments in Fluids. 2006; 41: 147-53. doi:10.1007/s00348-005-0080-y.
87. Overvelde M, Garbin V, Dollet B, de Jong N, Lohse D, Versluis M. Dynamics of Coated Microbubbles Adherent to a Wall. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2011; 37: 1500-8. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.05.025.
88. Vos HJ, Dollet B, Versluis M, de Jong N. Nonspherical Shape Oscillations of Coated Microbubbles in Contact With a Wall. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2011; 37: 935-48. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.02.013.
89. Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F, Guy RH. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: Implication for drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release. 2005; 104: 213-22. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.01.007.
90. Koshiyama K, Kodama T, Yano T, Fujikawa S. Structural change in lipid bilayers and water penetration induced by shock waves. Biophys J. 2006; 91: 2198-205.
91. Leontiadou H, Mark A, Marrink S. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrophilic Pores in Lipid Bilayers. Biophys J. 2004; 86: 2156-64.
92. Schroeder A, Kost J, Barenholz Y. Ultrasound, liposomes, and drug delivery: principles for using ultrasound to control the release of drugs from liposomes. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids. 2009; 162: 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2009.08.003.
93. Dijkmans P, Juffermans L, Musters R, van Wamel A, Cate F, van Gilst W, et al. Microbubbles and ultrasound: from diagnosis to therapy. Eur J Echocardiography. 2004; 5: 245-56
94. Zarnitsyn V, Rostad C, Prausnitz M. Modeling Transmembrane Transport through Cell Membrane Wounds Created by Acoustic Cavitation. Biophys J. 2008; 95: 4124-38.
95. Nyborg W. ULTRASOUND, CONTRAST AGENTS AND BIOLOGICAL CELLS; A SIMPLIFIED MODEL FOR THEIR INTERACTION DURING IN VITRO EXPERIMENTS. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2006; 32: 1557-68.
96. Lin H-Y, Thomas JL. Factors Affecting Responsivity of Unilamellar Liposomes to 20 kHz Ultrasound. Langmuir. 2004; 20: 6100-6. doi:10.1021/la049866z.
97. Pong M, Umchid S, Guarino AJ, Lewin PA, Litniewski J, Nowicki A, et al. In vitro ultrasound-mediated leakage from phospholipid vesicles. Ultrasonics. 2006; 45: 133-45. doi:S0041-624X(06)00345-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.07.021 [doi].
98. Enden G, Schroeder A. A mathematical model of drug release from liposomes by low frequency ultrasound. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2009; 37: 2640-5.
99. Luk AS, Kaler EW, Lee SP. Phospholipase C-induced aggregation and fusion of cholesterol-lecithin small unilamellar vesicles. Biochemistry. 1993; 32: 6965-73.
100. Nir S, Bentz J, Wilschut J, Duzgunes N . A ggregation a nd f usion o f phospholipid vesicles. Progress in Surface Science. 1983; 13: 1-124. doi:10.1016/0079-6816(83)90010-2.
101. Brown AC, Towles KB, Wrenn SP. M easuring r aft s ize as a function o f membrane composition in PC-based systems: Part II--ternary systems. Langmuir. 2007; 23: 11188-96. doi:10.1021/la7006342 [doi].
102. Brown AC, Towles KB, Wrenn SP. M easuring r aft s ize as a function o f membrane composition in PC-based systems: Part 1--binary systems. Langmuir. 2007; 23: 11180-7. doi:10.1021/la700633b [doi].
103. Brown DA, London E. Functions of lipid rafts in biological membranes. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1998; 14: 111-36. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.111 [doi].
104. Towles KB, Brown AC, Wrenn SP, Dan N. Effect of membrane microheterogeneity and domain size on fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Biophys J. 2007; 93: 655-67. doi:S0006-3495(07)71317-6 [pii] 10.1529/biophysj.106.090274 [doi].
105. Troup GM, Tulenko TN, Lee SP, Wrenn SP. Detection and characterization of laterally phase separated cholesterol domains in model lipid membranes. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2003; 29: 217-31.
106. Troup GM, Tulenko TN, Lee SP, Wrenn SP. Estimating the size of laterally phase separated cholesterol domains in model membranes with Förster resonance energy transfer: a simulation study. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2004; 33: 57-65.
107. Prausnitz M, Lee C, Liu C, Pang J, Singh T, Langer R, et al. Transdermal transport efficiency during skin electroporation and iontophoresis. Journal of Controlled Release. 1996; 38: 205-17.
108. Yoshida N, Tamura M, Kinjo M. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: a new tool for probing the microenvironment of the internal space of organelles. Single Molecule. 2000; 14: 279-83.
109. Crank J. The mathematics of diffusion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1975.
110. Rosenberg R, Dan N. Controlling surface porosity and release from hydrogels using a colloidal particle coating. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2010; 349: 498-504.
111. Rosenberg R, Dan N. Diffusion through colloidosome shells. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2011; 345: 478-82.
112. Berg H. Random walks in biology. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press; 1993.