Bioeffects caused by changes in acoustic cavitation bubble density and cell concentration: A unified explanation based on cell-to-bubble ratio and blast radius

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1211-1222

  Guzmán, Héctor R ^a   McNamara, Andrew J ^a   Nguyen, Daniel X ^a   Prausnitz, Mark R ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell density; Drug delivery; DU145 prostate cancer cell; Optison contrast agent concentration; Ultrasound bioeffects

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CORRELATION METHODS; TUMORS;

BIOEFFECTS;

ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; FS 069;

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; CANCER CELL; CELL DENSITY; CELL VIABILITY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 0042934166     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-5629(03)00899-8     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amabile P.G., Waugh J.M., Lewis T.N., et al. High-efficiency endovascular gene delivery via therapeutic ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 37:2001;1975-1980.
2. Apfel RE, Holland CK. Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991;17:179-185.
3. Bao S., Thrall B.D., Miller D.L. Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol. 23:1997;953-959.
4. Brayman A.A., Azadniv M., Cox C., Miller M.W. Hemolysis of Albunex-supplemented, 40% hematocrit human erythrocytes in vitro by 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound Acoustic pressure and pulse length dependence . Ultrasound Med Biol. 22:1996;927-938.
5. Brayman A.A., Coppage M.L., Vaidya S., Miller M.W. Transient poration and cell surface receptor removal from human lymphocytes in vitro by 1-MHz ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 25:1999;999-1008.
6. Cochran S.A., Prausnitz M.R. Sonoluminescence as an indicator of cell membrane disruption by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 27:2001;841-850.
7. Doukas A.G., Flotte T.J. Physical characteristics and biological effects of laser-induced stress waves. Ultrasound Med Biol. 22:1996;151-164.
8. Ellwart J.W., Brettel H., Kober L.O. Cell membrane damage by ultrasound at different cell concentrations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 14:1988;43-50.
9. Fechheimer M., Boylan J.F., Parker S., et al. Transfection of mammalian cells with plasmid DNA by scrape loading and sonication loading. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 84:1987;846-8467.
10. Greenleaf W.J., Bolander M.E., Sarkar G., Goldring M.B., Greenleaf J.F. Artificial cavitation nuclei significantly enhance acoustically induced cell transfection. Ultrasound Med Biol. 24:1998;587-595.
11. Guzmán H.R., Nguyen D.X., McNamara A., Prausnitz M.R. Equilibrium loading of cells with macromolecules by ultrasound Effects of molecular size and acoustic energy . J Pharm Sci. 91:2002;1693-1701.
12. Guzmán H.R., Nguyen D.X., Sohail K., Prausnitz M.R. Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes I Quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability . J Acoust Soc Am. 110:2001;588-596.
13. Guzmán H.R., Nguyen D.X., Sohail K., Prausnitz M.R. Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes II Heterogeneous effects on cells . J Acoust Soc Am. 110:2001;597-606.
14. Harrison G.H., Balcer-Kubiczek E., Gutierrez P.L. In vitro mechanisms of chemopotentiation by tone-burst ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 22:1996;355-362.
15. Keyhani K., Guzmán H.R., Parsons A., Lewis T.N., Prausnitz M.R. Intracellular drug delivery using low-frequency ultrasound Quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability . Pharm Res. 18:2002;1514-1520.
16. Kodama T., Takayama K. Dynamic behavior of bubbles during extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 24:1998;723-738.
17. Leighton T.G. The acoustic bubble. 1994;Academic Press, New York.
18. Miller D.L., Quddus J. Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast-agent gas bodies. Ultrasound Med Biol. 26:2000;661-667.
19. Miller D.L., Thomas R.M. Ultrasound contrast agents nucleate inertial cavitation in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol. 21:1995;1059-1065.
20. Miller D.L., Bao S., Morris J.E. Sonoporation of cultured cells in the rotating tube exposure tube. Ultrasound Med Biol. 25:1999;143-149.
21. Miller D.L., Gies R.A., Chrisler W.B. Ultrasonically induced hemolysis at high cell and gas body concentrations in a thin-disc exposure chamber. Ultrasound Med Biol. 23:1997;625-633.
22. Miller M.W., Miller D.L., Brayman A.A. A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med Biol. 22:1996;1131-1154.
23. Mukherjee D., Wong J., Griffin B., et al. Ten-fold augmentation of endothelial uptake of vascular endothelial growth factor with ultrasound after systemic administration. J Am Coll Cardiol. 35:2000;1678-1686.
24. Nyborg W.L. Biological effects of ultraound - Development of safety guidelines. Path II General reviews . Ultrasound Med Biol. 27:2001;301-333.
25. Pierce A.D. Acoustics. An introduction to its physical principles and applications. 3rd ed: 1994;Acoustical Society of America, New York.
26. Poliachik S.L., Chandler W.L., Mourad P.D., et al. Effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound on whole blood with and without microbubble contrast agent. Ultrasound Med Biol. 25:1999;991-998.
27. Prausnitz M.R., Lau B.S., Milano C.D., et al. A quantitative study of electroporation showing a plateau in net molecular transport. Biophys J. 65:1993;414-422.
28. Saad A.H., Hahn G.M. Ultrasound enhances adriamycin toxicity in vitro. Chato J.C., Diller T.E., Diller K.R., Roemer R.B. Heat transfer in bioengineering and medicine. 1987;American Society of Mechanical Engineers Press, New York, NY.
29. Sass W., Braunlich M., Dryer H.-P., et al. The mechanisms of stone disintegration by shock waves. Ultrasound Med Biol. 17:1991;239-243.
30. Skyba D.M., Camarano G., Goodman N.C., et al. Hemodynamic characteristics, myocardial kinetics and microvascular rheology of FS-069, a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent capable of producing myocardial opacification from a venous injection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 28:1996;1292-1300.
31. Unger E.C., Hersh E., Vannan M., McCreery T. Gene delivery using ultrasound contrast agents. Echocardiography. 18:2001;355-361.
32. Ward M., Wu J., Chiu J.F. Experimental study of the effects of Optison™ concentration on sonoporation in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol. 26:2000;1169-1175.
33. Williams A.R. Ultrasound. Biological effects and potential hazards. 1983;Academic Press, New York.
34. Wu J. Theoretical study on shear stress generated by microstreaming surrounding contrast agents attached to living cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 28:2002;125-129.
35. Wyber J.A., Andrews J., D'Emanuele A. The use of sonication for the efficient delivery of plasmid DNA into cells. Pharm Res. 14:1997;750-756.