WFUMB safety symposium on echo-contrast agents: Mechanisms for the interaction of ultrasound

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 224-232

  Nyborg, Wesley ^a  

^a University of Vermont   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALBUNEX; ECHO CONTRAST MEDIUM; QUANTISON;

ACOUSTICS; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOGRAPHY; ENCAPSULATION; HEAT TREATMENT; LIGHT SCATTERING; MICROBUBBLE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; OSCILLATION; PHAGOCYTOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; SAFETY; SOUND PRESSURE; THEORETICAL STUDY; VIBRATION;

HEAT; HUMANS; MICROBUBBLES; PHAGOCYTOSIS; PRESSURE; SAFETY; ULTRASONICS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 33846901667     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. AIUM. Mechanical bioeffects from diagnostic ultrasound: AIUM consensus statements. In: Fowlkes J.B., and Holland C.K. (Eds). J Ultrasound Med (2000) 69-168 19
2. AIUM/NEMA. Acoustic output measuring and labeling standard for diagnostic ultrasound equipment (1992), American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Laurel, MD
3. ANSI. Bubble detection and cavitation monitoring. ANSI Technical Report S1.24 TR-2002 (2002), Acoustical Society of America, New York
4. Apfel R.E., and Holland C.K. Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty-cycle diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 17 (1991) 179-185
5. ©, a new contrast agent. J Acoust Soc Am 87 (1990) 1792-1797
6. Brayman A.A., and Miller M.W. Cell density dependence of the ultrasonic degassing of fixed erythrocyte suspensions. Ultrasound Med Biol 19 (1993) 243-250
7. Carstensen E.L., Gracewski S., and Dalecki D. The search for cavitation in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 26 (2000) 1377-1385
8. © suspensions under pulsed ultrasound conditions. IEEE UFFC 48 (2001) 161-169
9. Chen Q., Zagzebski J., Wilson T., and Stiles T. Pressure-dependent attenuation in ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 28 (2002) 1041-1042
10. Chomas J.C.E., Dayton P., Allen J., Morgan K., and Ferrara K.W. Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction. IEEE UFFC 48 (2001) 232-248
11. Chomas J., Dayton P., Donovan M., and Ferrara K. Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. J Biomed. Optics (2001) 141-150 b;g:
12. Chomas J., Dayton P., Donovan M., and Ferrara K. Nondestructive subharmonic imaging. IEEE Trans UFFC 49 (2002) 883-892
13. Church C.C., and Brayman A.A. Can the presence of contrast media promote ultrasound bioeffects?. In: Thomsen H.S., Muller R.N., and Matterey R.F. (Eds). Trends in contrast media (1998), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 413-432
14. Church C.C., and Carstensen E.L. "Stable" inertial cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 27 (2001) 1435-1437
15. Coakley W.T., and Nyborg W.L. Cavitation: Dynamics of gas bubbles; applications. In: Fry F.J. (Ed). Ultrasound: Its applications in medicine and biology (1978), Elsevier Publishing Co, New York 77-159
16. Dayton P.A., Morgan K.E., Klibanov A.L., Brandenburger G., Nightingale K.R., and Ferrara K.W. A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents. IEEE Trans UFFC 44 (1997) 1264-1277
17. Dayton P.A., Klibanov A., Brandenburger G., and Ferrara K. Acoustic radiation force in vivo: A mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 25 (1999) 1195-1201
18. Dayton P.A., Morgan K.E., Klibanov K.L., Brandenburger G.H., and Ferrara K.W. Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents. IEEE Trans UFFC 46 (1999) 220-232
19. Dayton P.A., Chomas J.E., Lunn A.F.H., et al. Optical and acoustical dynamics of microbubble contrast agents inside neutrophils. Biophysical J 80 (2001) 1547-1556
20. de Jong N. Acoustic properties of ultrasound contrast agents. Ph. D. thesis, Erasmus University 1993.
21. de Jong N., Ten Cate F.J., Lancée C.T., Roelandt J.R.T.C., and Bom N. Principles and recent developments in ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics 29 (1991) 324-330
22. Deng C.X., and Lizzi F.L. A review of physical phenomena associated with ultrasonic contrast agents and illustrative clinical applications. Ultrasound Med Biol 28 (2002) 177-286
23. Duck F.A. Physical properties of tissue (1990), Academic Press, London
24. Dunn F. Cellular inactivation by heat and shear. Radiat Environ Biophys 24 (1985) 131-139
25. Everbach E.C., Makin I.R., Azadniv M., and Meltzer R.S. Correlation of ultrasound-induced hemolysis with cavitation detector output in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 23 (1997) 619-624
26. Flynn H.G. Physics of acoustic cavitation in liquids. In: Mason W.P. (Ed). Physical acoustics: Principles and methods Vol. 1 (1964), Academic Press, New York 57-172
27. Flynn H.G. Cavitation dynamics. II. Free pulsations and models for cavitation bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 58 (1975) 1160-1170
28. Frinking P.J.A., de Jong N., and Céspero E.I. Scattering properties of encapsulated gas bubbles at high ultrasound pressures. J Acoust Soc Am 105 (1999) 1989-1996
29. Hilgenfeldt S., Lohse D., and Zomack M. Sound scattering and localized heat deposition of pulse-driven microbubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 107 (2000) 3530-3539
30. Holt R.G., and Roy R.A. Measurements of bubble-enhanced heating from focused, MHz-frequency ultrasound in a tissue-mimicking material. Ultrasound Med Biol 27 (2001) 1399-1412
31. Kudo N, Miyaoka T, Okada K, Yamamoto K, Niwa K. Study on mechanism of cell damage caused by microbubbles exposed to ultrasound. Proc. 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 1351-1354. ISBN No. 0-7803-7583-1.
32. Leighton T.L. The acoustic bubble (1994), Academic Press, London
33. © suspensions at concentrations approaching in vivo doses. J Acoust Soc Am 101 (1997) 1155-1161
34. May D.J., Allen J.S., and Ferrara K.W. Dynamics and fragmentation of thick-shelled microbubbles. IEEE Trans Ultrasound Ferroelec Freq Contr 49 (2002) 1400-1410
35. Medwin H. Counting bubbles acoustically: A review. Ultrasonics 15 (1977) 7-13
36. Miller D.L. Particle gathering and microstreaming near ultrasonically activated gas-filled micropores. J Acoust Soc Am 84 (1988) 1378-1387
37. Miller D.L. Frequency relationships for ultrasonic activation of free microbubbles, encapsulated microbubbles and gas-filled micropores. J Acoust Soc Am 104 (1998) 2498-2505
38. Miller D.L., and Gies R.A. Gas-body-based contrast agent enhances vascular bioeffects of 1.09 MHz ultrasound on mouse intestine. Ultrasound Med Biol 24 (1998) 1201-1208
39. Miller D.L., Thomas R.M., and Williams A.R. Mechanisms for hemolysis by ultrasonic cavitation in the rotating exposure system. Ultrasound Med Biol 17 (1991) 171-178
40. Miller D.L., and Quddus J. Diagnostic ultrasound-induced membrane damage in phagocytic cells loaded with contrast agents and its relation to Doppler-mode images. IEEE UFFC 49 (2002) 1094-1102
41. NCRP. Biological effects of ultrasound: mechanisms and clinical implications. National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurements Report No. 74 (1983), NCRP Publications, Bethesda, Md
42. NCRP. Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: I. Criteria based on thermal mechanisms. National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurements Report No. 113 (1992), NCRP Publications, Bethesda, Md
43. NCRP. Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: II. Criteria based on all known mechanisms. National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurements Report No. 140, Section 3.3 (2002), NCRP Publications, Bethesda, Md
44. Nyborg W.L., and Miller D.L. Biophysical implications of bubble dynamics. Appl Sci Res 38 (1982) 17-24
45. Plesset M.S., and Mitchell T.P. On the stability of the spherical shape of a vapor cavity in a liquid. Quarterly Appl Math 13 (1956) 419-430
46. Rayleigh, and Lord. On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity. Phil Mag 34 (1917) 94-98
47. Shi W.T., Forsberg F., Tornes A., Ostensen J., and Goldberg B.B. Destruction of contrast microbubbles and the association with inertial cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 26 (2000) 1009-1019
48. Sokka S.D., King R., and Hynynen K. MRI-guided gas bubble enhanced ultrasound heating in in vivo rabbit thigh. Phys Med Biol 48 (2003) 223-241
49. Starritt H.C. Non-thermal effects-acoustic streaming and other radiation stress effects. In: ter Haar G., and Duck F.A. (Eds). The safe use of ultrasound in medical diagnosis (2000), The British Medical Ultrasound Society/The British Institute of Radiology, London 54-61
50. Stride E., and Saffari N. On the destruction of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 29 (2003) 563-573
51. Suslick K.S., and Kemper K.A. The effect of fluorocarbon gases on sonoluminescence: A failure of the electrical hypothesis. Ultrasonics 31 (1993) 463-465
52. Uhlendorf V., Scholle F.-D., and Reinhardt M. Acoustic behaviour of current ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics 38 (2000) 81-86
53. Umemura S, Kawabata K, Sanghvi N, Sasaki K. In vivo acceleration of ultrasonic tissue heating by microbubble agent. Proc 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. 1375-1378. ISBN No. 0-7803-7583-1.
54. Watmough D.J., Lakshmi R., Ghezzi F., et al. The effect of gas bubbles on the production of ultrasound hyperthermia at 0.75 MHz: A phantom study. Ultrasound Med Biol 19 (1993) 231-241
55. WFUMB. WFUMB Symposium on Safety of Ultrasound in Medicine. In: Barnett S.B. (Ed). Ultrasound Med Biol (1998) S1-S58 24 (Suppl 1):V-XVI
56. Wu J., Winkler A.J., and O'Neill T.P. Effect of acoustic streaming on ultrasonic heating. Ultrasound Med Biol 20 (1994) 195-201
57. Wu J. Temperature rise generated by ultrasound in the presence of contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 24 (1998) 267-274
58. Wu J. Theoretical study on shear stress generated by microstreaming surrounding contrast agents attached to living cells. Ultrasound Med Biol 28 (2002) 125-129
59. Wu J., Pepe J., and Dewitt III W. Nonlinear behaviours of contrast agents relevant to diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Ultrasonics 29 (2003) 555-562
60. Young F.R. Cavitation (1989), McGraw-Hill, New York