A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1749-1757

  Chatterjee, Dhiman ^a   Sarkar, Kausik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast agent; Encapsulation; Interfacial rheology; Optison ; Subharmonic; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

BUBBLES (IN FLUIDS); DILATOMETERS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); RHEOLOGY; SURFACE TENSION; VISCOSITY;

SUBHARMONIC EMISSION;

ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

ALBUNEX; CONTRAST MEDIUM; FS 069; QUANTISON;

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ECHOGRAPHY; ENCAPSULATION; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FLOW KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATION SCATTERING; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURFACE TENSION; TENSION; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0347123248     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-5629(03)01051-2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allen J.S., Kruse D.E., Ferrara K.W. Shell waves and acoustic scattering from ultrasound contrast agents. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Control. 48:(2):2001;409-418.
2. Allen J.S., May D.J., Ferrara K.W. Dynamics of therapeutic ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol. 28:(6):2002;805-816.
3. Apfel R.E., Holland C.K. Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse low-duty cycle of diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 17:(2):1991;179-185.
4. Bouakaz A., de Jong N., Cachard C. Standard properties of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol. 24:(3):1998;469-472.
5. Brennen C.E. Cavitation and bubble dynamics. 1995;Oxford University Press, New York. 83.
6. Chang PH, Shung KK, Levene HB. Quantitative measurements of second harmonic Doppler using ultrasound contrast agents. 1996;22(9):1205-1214.
7. Christiansen C., Kryvi H., Sontum P.C., Skotland T. Physical and biochemical characterization of Albunex, a new ultrasound contrast agent consisting of air-filled albumin microspheres suspended in a solution of human albumin. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 19:1994;307-320.
8. Church C.C. The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am. 97:1995;1510-1521.
9. Davies J.T., Rideal E.K. Interfacial phenomena. 1961;Academic Press, New York.
10. de Jong N., Hoff L. Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres. Ultrasonics. 31:(3):1993;175-181.
11. de Jong N., Cornet R., Lancèe C.T. Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part one Simulations . Ultrasonics. 32:(6):1994;447-453.
12. de Jong N., Cornet R., Lancèe C.T. Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part two Measurements . Ultrasonics. 32:(6):1994;455-459.
13. de Jong N., Hoff L., Skotland T., Bom N. Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres Theoretical consideration and some measurements . Ultrasonics. 30:(2):1992;95-103.
14. Edwards DA, Brenner H, Wasan DT. Interfacial transport processes and rheology. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991.
15. Evans EA, Skalak R. Mechanics and thermodynamics of biomembranes. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1980.
16. Forsberg F., Goldberg B.B., Liu J.B., Merton D.A., Rawool N.M. On the feasibility of real-time, in vivo harmonic imaging with proteinaceous microspheres. J Ultrasound Med. 15:1996;853-860.
17. Frinking P.J.A., de Jong N. Acoustic modeling of shell-encapsulated gas bubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 24:(4):1998;523-533.
18. Graham D.E., Phillips M.C. Proteins at liquid interfaces, IV. Dilatational properties and V shear properties. J Coll Int Sci. 70:(3):1980;227. 239-250.
19. Hilgenfeldt S., Lohse D., Zomack M. Response of bubbles to diagnostic ultrasound A unifying theoretical approach . Eur Phys J B. 4:1998;247-255.
20. Hoff L., Sontum P.C., Hovem J.M. Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles Effect of the encapsulating shell . J Acoust Soc Am. 107:(4):2000;2272-2280.
21. Khismatullin D.B., Nadim A. Radial oscillations of encapsulated microbubbles in viscoelastic liquids. Phys Fluids. 14:(10):2002;3534-3557.
22. Kralchevsky P.A., Nagayama K. Particles at fluids interfaces and membranes. Studies in Interface Science Vol. 10. 2001;Elsevier, Amsterdam. 158.
23. Leighton T.G. The acoustic bubble. 1994;Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
24. May D.J., Allen J.S., Ferrara K.W. Dynamics and fragmentation of thick-shelled microbubbles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Control. 49:(10):2002;1400-1410.
25. Medwin H. Counting bubbles acoustically A review . Ultrasonics. 15:1977;7-13.
26. Morgan K.E., Allen J.S., Dayton P.A., et al. Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior Effect of transmitted phase and bubble size . IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Control. 47:(6):2000;1494-1509.
27. Myrset A.H., Nicolaysen H., Toft K., Christiansen C., Skotland T. Structure and organization of albumin molecules forming the shell of air-filled microspheres Evidence for a monolayer of albumin molecules of multiple orientations stabilizing the enclosed air . Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 24:1996;145-153.
28. Roy RA, Church CC, Calabrese A. Cavitation produced by short pulses of ultrasound. In: Hamilton MF, Blackstock DA, eds. Frontiers of nonlinear acoustics: Proceedings of the 12th ISNA. London, UK: Elsevier, 1990.
29. Sarkar K., Prosperetti A. Coherent and incoherent scattering by oceanic bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am. 96:1994;332-341.
30. Shankar P.M., Krishna P.D., Newhouse V.L. Advantages of subharmonic over second harmonic backscatter for contrast-to-tissue echo enhancement. Ultrasound Med Biol. 24:(3):1998;395-399.
31. Shi W.T., Forsberg F., Hall A.L., et al. Subharmonic imaging with microbubble contrast agents Initial results . Ultrasound Imaging. 21:1999;79-94.
32. Simpson D.H., Chin C.T., Burns P.N. Pulse inversion Doppler A new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents . IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Control. 46:(2):1999;372-382.
33. Soetanto K., Chan M. Fundamental studies on contrast images from different-sized microbubbles Analytical and experimental studies . Ultrasound Med Biol. 26:(1):2000;81-91.
34. Ye Z. On sound scattering and attenuation of Albunex bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am. 100:(4):1996;2011-2028.