Ultrasound, contrast agents and biological cells; A simplified model for their interaction during in vitro experiments

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1557-1568

  Nyborg, Wesley L ^a  

^a University of Vermont   (United States)

Author keywords

Activation; Attenuation; Cells; Contrast agents; In vitro; Model; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION; CONTRAST AGENTS; IN VITRO;

ATTENUATION; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; MEDICINE; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; ULTRASONICS;

CELLS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL COUNT; CELL DISRUPTION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL ULTRASTRUCTURE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CYTOLYSIS; IN VITRO STUDY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; ULTRASOUND;

ANIMALS; CELL COUNT; CELLS; CONTRAST MEDIA; MATHEMATICS; MICROBUBBLES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 33749522864     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.05.032     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brayman A.A., Azadniv M., Makin I.R.S., et al. Effect of a stabilized microbubble echo contrast agent on hemolysis of human erythrocytes exposed to high intensity pulsed ultrasound. Echocardiology 12 (1995) 13-21
2. Chen W.-S., Brayman A.A., Matula T.J., and Crum L.A. Inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis produced in vitro with or without Optison. Ultrasound Med Biol 29 (2003) 725-737
3. Chomas J.E., Dayton P., Allen J., Morgan K., and Ferrara K.W. Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Control 48 (2001) 232-247
4. de Jong N., Hoff L., Skotland T., and Born N. Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: Theoretical considerations and some measurements. Ultrasonics 30 (1992) 95-103
5. Guzmán H.R., McNamara A.J., Nguyen D.X., and Prausnitz M.R. Bioeffects caused by changes in acoustic cavitation bubble density and cell concentration: A unified explanation based on cell-to-bubble ratio and blast radius. Ultrasound Med Biol 29 (2003) 1211-1222
6. Kamaev P.P., Hutcheson J.D., Wilson M.L., and Prausnitz M.R. Quantification of Optison bubble size and lifetime during sonication; dominant role of secondary cavitation bubbles causing acoustic bioeffects. J. Acoust Soc Am 115 (2004) 1818-1825
7. Krasovitski B., Kimmel E., Sapunar M., and Adam D. Ultrasonic attenuation by encapsulated microbubbles: Time and pressure effects. Ultrasound Med Biol 30 (2004) 793-802
8. Marsh J.N., Hall C.S., Hughes M.S., Mobley J., Miller J.G., and Brandenburger G.H. Broadband through-transmission signal loss measurements of Albunex suspensions at concentrations approaching in vivo doses. J Acoust Soc Am 101 (1997) 1155-1161
9. Miller D.L. The influence of hematocrit on hemolysis by ultrasonically activated gas-filled micropores. Ultrasound Med Biol 14 (1988) 293-297
10. Miller D.L. Particle gathering and microstreaming near ultrasonically activated gas-filled micropores. Acoust Soc Am 84 (1988) 1378-1387
11. Miller D.L., Bao S., and Morris J.E. Sonoporation of cultured cells in the rotating tube exposure system. Ultrasound Med Biol 25 (1999) 143-149
12. Miller D.L., Thomas R.M., and Williams A.R. Mechanisms for hemolysis by ultrasonic cavitation in the rotating exposure system. Ultrasound Med Biol 17 (1991) 171-178
13. Miller M.W., Azadniv M., Doida Y., and Brayman A.A. Effect of a stabilized microbubble contrast agent on CW ultrasound-induced red blood cell lysis in vitro. Echocardiography 12 (1995) 1-11
14. NCRP National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: II. Criteria based on all known mechanisms (2002), National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD Report No 140
15. Neppiras E.A., and Coakley W.T. Acoustic cavitation in a focused field in water at 1 MHz. J Sound Vib 45 (1976) 341-373
16. Nyborg W.L., and Miller D.L. Biophysical implications of bubble dynamics. In: van Wijngaarden L. (Ed). The mechanics and physics of bubbles in liquids (1982), Kluwer, New York 17-24
17. Nyborg W.L., and Miller D.L. Biophysical implications of bubble dynamics. Appl Sci Res 38 (1982) 17-24
18. Postema M., van Wamel A., Lancée C.T., and de Jong N. Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. Ultrasound Med Biol 30 (2004) 827-840
19. Ward M., Wu J., and Chiu J.-F. Experimental study of the effects of Optison concentration on sonoporation in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 26 (2000) 1169-1175
20. Wu J., and Tong J. Experimental study of instability of a contrast agent in an ultrasound field. Ultrasound Med Biol 24 (1998) 257-265
21. Zarnitsyn V.G., and Prausmtz M.R. Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. Ultrasound Med Biol 30 (2004) 527-538