Dynamics of Coated Microbubbles Adherent to a Wall

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1500-1508

  Overvelde, Marlies ^a   Garbin, Valeria ^a,d   Dollet, Benjamin ^b   De Jong, Nico ^a,c   Lohse, Detlef ^a   Versluis, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adherent; Ligands; Microbubbles; Molecular imaging; Nonlinear bubble dynamics; Resonance; Targeting; Ultrasound contrast agents

Indexed keywords

ADHERENT; BUBBLE DYNAMICS; MICROBUBBLES; MOLECULAR IMAGING; TARGETING; ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENTS;

ACOUSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSIS; DYNAMICS; LIGANDS; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ULTRASONICS;

FREQUENCY RESPONSE;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DYNAMICS; FREQUENCY ANALYZER; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MICROBUBBLE; MOLECULAR IMAGING; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ACOUSTICS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FLUOROCARBONS; MICROBUBBLES; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NITROGEN; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; SUSPENSIONS; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 79960935593     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: 1879291X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.05.025     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Allen J.S., Kruse D.E., Dustin E., Dayton P.A., Ferrara K.W. Effect of coupled oscillations on microbubble behavior. J Acoust Soc Am 2003, 114:1678.
2. Chin C.T., Lancée C., Borsboom J., Mastik F., Frijlink M.E., De Jong N., Versluis M., Lohse D. Brandaris 128: A digital 25 million frames per second camera with 128 highly sensitive frames. Rev Sci Instr 2003, 74:5026-5034.
3. Dayton P.A., Allen J.S., Ferrara K.W. The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am 2002, 112:2183-2192.
4. Dayton P.A., Klibanov A.L., Brandenburger G., Ferrara K.W. Acoustic radiation force in vivo: A mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999, 25:1195-1201.
5. Doinikov A.A., Zhao S., Dayton P.A. Modeling of the acoustic response from contrast agent microbubbles near a rigid wall. Ultrasonics 2009, 49:195-201.
6. Eniola A.O., Willcox P.J., Hammer D.A. Interplay between rolling and firm adhesion elucidated with a cell-free system engineered with two distinct receptor-ligand pairs. Biophys J 2003, 85:2720-2731.
7. Garbin V., Cojoc D., Ferrari E., Di Fabrizio E., Overvelde M.L.J., Van der Meer S.M., De Jong N., Lohse D., Versluis M. Changes in microbubble dynamics near a boundary revealed by combined optical micromanipulation and high-speed imaging. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 90:114103.
8. Garbin V., Dollet B., Overvelde M., Cojoc D., Di Fabrizio E., Wijngaarden L., Prosperetti A., de Jong N., Lohse D., Versluis M. History force on coated microbubbles propelled by ultrasound. Phys Fluids 2009, 21:092003.
9. Ham A.S., Klibanov A.L., Lawrence M.B. Action at a distance: Lengthening adhesion bonds with poly(ethylene glycol) spacers enhances mechanically stressed affinity for improved vascular targeting of microparticles. Langmuir 2009, 25:10038-10044.
10. Hilgenfeldt S., Lohse D., Zomack M. Response of bubbles to diagnostic ultrasound: A unifying theoretical approach. Eur Phys J B 1998, 4:247-255.
11. De Jong N., Emmer M., Chin C.T., Bouakaz A., Mastik F., Lohse D., Versluis M. "Compression-Only" behavior of phospholipid-coated contrast bubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007, 33:653-656.
12. Klibanov A.L. Preparation of targeted microbubbles: Ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009, 47:875-882.
13. Klibanov A.L., Rychak J.J., Yang W.C., Alikhani B., Acton S., Lindner J.R., Ley K., Kaul S. Targeted ultrasound contrast agent for molecular imaging of inflammation in high-shear flow. Mol Imaging 2006, 266:259-266.
14. Lankford M., Behm C.Z., Yeh J., Klibanov A.L., Robinson P., Lindner J.R. Effect of microbubble ligation to cells on ultrasound signal enhancement. implications for targeted imaging. Invest Radiol 2006, 41.
15. Leighton T.G. The acoustic bubble 1994, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
16. Lindner J.R. Microbubbles in medical imaging: Current applications and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004, 3:527-533.
17. Marmottant P., Van der Meer S.M., Emmer M., Versluis M., De Jong N., Hilgenfeldt S., Lohse D. A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture. J Acoust Soc Am 2005, 118:3499-3505.
18. Overvelde M. Ultrasound contrast agents: Dynamics of coated bubbles. Ph.D. thesis. 2010a.
19. Overvelde M., Garbin V., Sijl J., de Jong N., Lohse D., Versluis M. Nonlinear shell behavior of phospholipid-coated microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010, 36:2080-2092.
20. Plesset M.S., Prosperetti A. Cavitation and bubble dynamics. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 1977, 9:145-185.
21. Rychak J.J., Klibanov A.L., Ley K.F., Hossack J.A. Enhanced targeting of ultrasound contrast agents using acoustic radiation force. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007, 33:1132-1139.
22. Sijl J., Overvelde M., Dollet B., Garbin V., de Jong N., Lohse D., Versluis M. 'Compression-only' behavior: A second order nonlinear response of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 2011, 129:1729-1739.
23. Schneider M, Bichon D, Bussat P, Puginier J, Hybl, E. Patent WO 91/15244. 1991.
24. Takalkar A.M., Klibanov A.L., Rychak J.J., Lindner J.R., Ley K. Binding and detachment dynamics of microbubbles targeted to P-selectin under controlled shear flow. J Control Rel 2004, 96:473-482.
25. Van der Meer S.M., Dollet B., Chin C.T., Bouakaz A., Voormolen M., De Jong N., Versluis M., Lohse D. Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am 2007, 121:648-656.
26. Zhang D., Gong Y., Gong X., Liu Z., Tan K., Zheng H. Enhancement of subharmonic emission from encapsulated microbubbles by using a chirp excitation technique. Phys Med Biol 2007, 52:5531-5544.
27. Zhao S., Kruse D.E., Ferrara K.W., Dayton P.A. Acoustic response from adherent targeted contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am 2006, 120:EL63-EL69.