Group informatics: A methodological approach and ontology for sociotechnical group research

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 516-539

  Goggins, Sean P ^a   Mascaro, Christopher ^a   Valetto, Giuseppe ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

collaboration; content analysis; human computer interaction

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; METADATA; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COLLABORATION; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CRISIS INFORMATICS; INTEGRATED ELECTRONICS; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; POLITICAL DISCOURSE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH QUESTIONS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84874237765     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22802     Document Type: Article

References (168)

1. Agre, P.E., (2004). The practical republic: Social skills and the progress of citizenship. In, A. Feenberg, &, D. Barney, (Eds.), Community in the digital age: Philosophy and practice (pp. 201-223). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
2. Ahuja, M.K., &, Carley, K.M., (1999). Network structure in virtual organizations. Organization Science, 741-757.
3. Amelung, C., (2005). A context-aware notification framework for developers of computer supported collaborative environments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
4. Arrow, H., McGrath, J.E., &, Berdahl, J.L., (2000). Small groups as complex systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5. Backstrom, L., Kumar, R., Marlow, C., Novak, J., &, Tomkins, A., (2008). Preferential behavior in online groups. Proceedings of WSDM '08 Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining (pp. 117-128). New York, NY: ACM.
6. Balkundi, P., &, Kilduff, M., (2006). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17 (4), 419-439. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1048984306000038
7. Bandura, A., (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Bandura, A., (1997). Self efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Macmillan.
9. Bansler, J., &, Havn, E., (2006). Sensemaking in technology-use mediation: adapting groupware technology in organizations. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15, 55-91.
10. Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., &, Sailer, L., (1984). The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 495-517. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2155679
11. Black, A., Mascaro, C., Gallagher, M., &, Goggins, S.P., (2012). Twitter Zombie: Architecture for capturing, socially transforming and analyzing the Twittersphere. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Group Conference, (pp. 229-238). Presented at the ACM Group, Sanibel Island, FL.
12. Blay-Fornario, M., Pinna-Dery, A.M., Schmidt, K., &, Zarate, P., (Eds.). (2002). Cooperative systems design: a challenge of the mobility age. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
13. Blincoe, K., Valetto, G., &, Goggins, S.P., (2012). Leveraging task contexts for managing developers' coordination. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM CSCW Conference (pp. 1351-1360). Presented at the Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA: ACM.
14. Borgatti, S.P., &, Everett, M.G., (1997). Network Analysis of Two Mode Data. Social Networks, 19 (3), 243-269
15. Bos, N., Shami, N.S., Olson, J.S., Cheshin, A., &, Nan, N., (2004). In-group/out-group effects in distributed teams: an experimental simulation. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chicago, IL, (pp. 429-436).
16. Boyd, D., Golder, S., &, Lotan, G., (2011). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. Retrieved from http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/HICSS.2010.412
17. Brown, J.S., &, Duguid, P., (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organizational Science, 2 (1), 40-57.
18. Burt, R.S., (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id= ArhGch9zmqwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq= brokerage+leadership+social+network&ots=ihdZJt-xBC&sig= fidyOMDut6s3MtMjyUw-H0HOJFU
19. Butler, B., &, Crowston, K., (2012, July 30). Data collection and management issues in socio-technical scholarship personal communication.
20. Cakir, M.P., (2007). How online small groups create and use mathematical objects to do collaborative problem solving. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference of the International Society of the Learning Sciences, (pp. 839-841).
21. Carroll, J.M., Neale, D.C., Isenhour, P.L., Rosson, M.B., &, McCrickard, D.S., (2003). Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-orientedcollaborative activity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 605-632.
22. Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B., Farooq, U., &, Xiao, L., (2009). Beyond being aware. Information and Organization, 162-185. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg. 2009.04.004
23. Cataldo, M., Bass, M., Herbsleb, J., &, Bass, L., (2007). On coordination mechanisms in global software development. global software engineering, doi:http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2007.33
24. Cataldo, M., Herbsleb, J.D., &, Carley, K.M., (2008). Socio-technical congruence: a framework for assessing the impact of technical and work dependencies on software development productivity. In Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, Kaiserslauter, Germany, (pp. 2-11).
25. Cataldo, M., Mockus, A., Roberts, J.A., &, Herbsleb, J.D., (2009). Software dependencies, work dependencies, and their impact on failures. doi: 10.1109/TSE.2009.42
26. Christensen, L.R., (2007). Practices of stigmergy in architectural work. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference Conference, Sanibel, Island, FL, (pp. 11-20).
27. Christensen, L.R., (2008). The logic of practices of stigmergy: representational artifacts in architectural design. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Diego, CA, (pp. 559-568).
28. Chudoba, K.M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., &, Watson-Manheim, M.B., (2005). How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Journal of Information Systems, 15, 279-306.
29. Convertino, G., Moran, T.P., &, Smith, B.A., (2007). Studying activity patterns in CSCW. In COmputer Human Interaction 2007 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, (pp. 2339-2344).
30. Cox, A., Clough, P., &, Siersdorfer, S., (2011). Developing metrics to characterize Flickr groups. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 (3), 493-506.
31. Crabtree, A., O'Neill, J., Tolmie, P., Castellani, S., Colombino, T., &, Grasso, A., (2006). The practical indispensability of articulation work to immediate and remote help-giving. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 219-228). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1180910
32. Cronin, B., (2011). The intelligence disconnect. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (10), 1867-1868. doi: 10.1002/asi.v62.10
33. Crowston, K., &, Howison, J., (2005). The social structure of free and open source software development. First Monday, 10 (2). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1207/1127
34. Crowston, K., Wiggins, A., &, Howison, J., (2010). Analyzing leadership dynamics in distributed group communication. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Manoa, H I, (pp. 1-10).
35. Davis, A., Gardner, B.B., Gardner, M.R., &, Silver, J.W., (1965). Deep south. Retrieved from http://link.libris.kb.se/sfxumub?sid= google&auinit=A&aulast=Davis&title=Deep+south&genre= book&date=1965
36. Diani, M., (2003). 5.Leaders' or brokers? Positions and influence in social movement networks. Social Movements and Networks, 1 (9), 105-123. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/oso/648574/2003/00000001/ 00000001/art00007
37. Dourish, P., (2001). Where the action is: Foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Dourish, P., (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8, 19-30.
39. Edwards, K.W., (2005). Putting computing in context: An infrastructure to support extensible context-enhanced collaborative applications. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12 (4), 446-474.
40. Ehrlich, K., &, Cash, D., (1999). The invisible world of intermediaries: A cautionary tale. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 147-167.
41. Falkowski, T., Bartelheimer, J., &, Spiliopoulou, M., (2006). Mining and visualizing the evolution of subgroups in social networks. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (pp. 52-58). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1248823.1249048
42. Fine, G.A., &, Harrington, B., (2004). Tiny publics: Small groups and civil society. Sociological Theory, 22 (3), 341-356. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00223.x/abstract
43. Fleming, L., &, Waguespack, D.M., (2007). Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organization Science, 18 (2), 165. Retrieved from http://orgsci.highwire.org/cgi/content/abstract/18/ 2/165
44. Fletcher, J.K., &, Kaufer, K., (2003). Shared leadership. Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership, 21-47.
45. Freeman, L.C., (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1 (3), 215-239. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378873378900217
46. Freeman, L.C., (2003). Finding social groups: A meta-analysis of the southern women data. Dynamic social Network modeling and analysis, 39-97.
47. Freeman, L.C., (2004). The development of social network analysis. Vancouver, BC: Empirical Press.
48. Freeman, L.C., Romney, A.K., &, Freeman, S.C., (1987). Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. American anthropologist, 89 (2), 310-325. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/aa.1987.89.2.02a00020/ abstract
49. Friedkin, N.E., (1991). Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. American journal of Sociology, 1478-1504. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/ stable/2781908
50. Fuller, M.A., Hardin, A.M., &, Davison, R.M., (2007). Efficacy in technology-mediated distributed teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23 (3), 209-235. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230308
51. Fuller, M.A., Hardin, A.M., &, Scott, C.L., (2007). Diffusion of virtual innovation. The DATA Base for Advances in Information Systems, 38 (4), 40-45.
52. Geiger, R.S., &, Ribes, D., (2011). Trace Ethnography: Following Coordination through Documentary Practices. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Koloa, Kauai, HI, (pp. 1-10).
53. Geister, S., &, Hertel, G., (2006). Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 37, 459-489.
54. Glaser, B., &, Strass, A., (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
55. Goggins, S.P., (2006). Implications of Group Size on Activty Awareness Tools and Consideration of Information Foraging Theory. Presented at the Workshop on Activity Awareness at CSCW 2006, Banff, Alberta, Canada: ACM. Retrieved from http://www.seangoggins.net
56. Goggins, S.P., Gallagher, M., Laffey, J., &, Amelung, C., (2010). Social Intelligence in Completely Online Groups-Toward Social Prosthetics from Log Data Analysis and Transformation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, Minneapolis, MN, (pp. 500-507).
57. Goggins, S.P., Galyen, K., &, Laffey, J., (2010). Network Analysis of Trace Data for the Support of Group Work: Activity Patterns in a Completely Online Course. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Group Conference (pp. 107-116). Sanibel Island, FL: ACM.
58. Goggins, S.P., Laffey, J., &, Amelung, C., (2011). Context Aware CSCL: Moving Toward Contextualized Analysis. In Proceddings of CSCL 2011, Hong Kong, (pp. 591-596).
59. Goggins, S.P., Laffey, J., &, Gallagher, M., (2011). Completely online group formation and development: small groups as socio-technical systems. Information Technology & People, 24 (2), 104-133.
60. Goggins, S.P., Laffey, J., &, Galyen, K., (2009). Social Ability in Online Groups: Representing the Quality of Interactions in Social Computing Environments. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE Conference on Social Computing,Vancouver, Canada, (pp. 667-674).
61. Goggins, S.P., Laffey, J., &, Tsai, I., (2007). Cooperation and groupness: Community formation in small online collaborative groups. In Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL, (pp. 207-216).
62. Goggins, S., &, Mascaro, C., (2013). Context Matters: The Experience of Physical, Informational and Cultural Distance in a Rural IT Firm. The Information Society, in press.
63. Goggins, S.P., Mascaro, C., &, Mascaro, S., (2012). Relief after the 2010 Haiti Earthquake: Participation and Leadership in an Online Resource Coordination Network. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA, (pp. 57-66).
64. Goggins, S.P., Schmidt, M., Moore, J.L., &, Guajardo, J., (2011). 3D virtual worlds: Assessing the experience and informing design. International Journal of Social and Organizational Dynamics in IT, 1 (1), 30-48.
65. Goggins, S.P., &, Valetto, G., (2010). An Interaction Warehouse for Workgroup Development Pattern Identification. Presented at the IFIP 9.1 Workshop, St. Louis, MO. Retrieved from http://www.jpedia.org/ifipwg91
66. Goggins, S.P., Valetto, P., Mascaro, C., &, Blincoe, K., (2012). Creating a model of the dynamics of socio-technical groups using electronic trace data. doi: 10.1108/09593841111137322
67. Golbeck, J., Grimes, J.M., &, Rogers, A., (2010). Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (8), 1612-1621. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1002/asi.21344/full
68. Granovetter, M.S., (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 1360-1380. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
69. Grudin, J., (1994). Eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM, 37, 92-116.
70. Grudin, J., (2010). Timelines: CSCW: Time passed, tempest, and time past. Interactions, 17 (4), 38-40.
71. Gutwin, C., &, Greenberg, S., (2004). The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In, E. Salas, and, S.M. Fiore, (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 177-201). Washington, DC: APA Press.
72. Gutwin, C., Penner, R., &, Schneider, K., (2004). Group awareness in distributed software development. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference On Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chicago, IL (pp. 72-81).
73. Harrison, S., &, Tatar, D., (2007). Places: people, events, loci-the relation of semantic frames in the construction of place. Computer Supported Coorperative Work (CSCW), 17 (2), 97-133.
74. Healy, P.G.T., White, G., Eshghi, A., Reeves, A.J., &, Light, A., (2007). Communication spaces. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16.
75. Heverin, T., &, Zach, L., (2011). Use of microblogging for collective sensemaking during violent crises: A study of three campus shootings. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.21685/full
76. Hinds, P., &, McGrath, C., (2006). Structures that work: social structure, work structure and coordination ease in geographically distributed teams. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Banff, Alberta, Canada, (pp. 343-352).
77. Howison, J., Wiggins, A., &, Crowston, K., (2012). Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 12 (2)(2).
78. Howley, I., Mayfield, E., &, Rosé, C.P., (2012). Linguistic analysis methods for studying small groups. Retrieved from http://learnlab.org/ research/wiki/images/5/58/Chapter-Methods-Revised-Final.pdf
79. Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., &, Chowdury, A., (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (11), 2169-2188. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.21149/full
80. Kaptelinin, V., &, Nardi, B.A., (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design (acting with technology). Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%3FASIN=0262112981%26tag=ws%26lcode= xm2%26cID=2025%26ccmID=165953%26location=/o/ASIN/0262112981%253FSubscriptionId= 0NM5T5X751JWT17C4GG2
81. Kiesler, S., Boh, W.F., Ren, Y., &, Weisband, S., (2005). Virtual teams and the geographically dispersed professional organization. In Proceedings from The Workshop on Extending the Contributions of Professor Rob Kling to the Analysis of Computerization Movements. Presented at the ASIS&T, Charlotte, NC.
82. King, G., (2011). Ensuring the data rich future of the social sciences. doi: 10.1126/science.1197448
83. Kittur, A., Chi, E., Pendleton, B.A., Suh, B., &, Mytkowicz, T., (2007). Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. World Wide Web, 1 (2), 19.
84. Kittur, A., Lee, B., &, Kraut, R., (2009). Coordination in collective intelligence: the role of team structure and task interdependence. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, (pp. 1495-1504).
85. Kling, R., (1979). Social issues and impacts of computing: From arena to discipline. Human Choice and Computers, 2, 146-155.
86. Kling, R., (1980). Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 12 (1), 61-110.
87. Kling, R., (2007). What is social informatics and why does it matter? The Information Society, 23 (4), 205-220. doi: 10.1080/01972240701441556
88. Kling, R., &, Courtright, C., (2004). Group behavior and learning in electronic forums: A sociotechnical approach. In, S. Barab, R. Kling, &, J.H. Gray, (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 91-119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
89. Kling, R., Crawford, H., Rosenbaum, H., Sawyer, S., &, Weisband, S., (2000). Learning from social informatics: Information and communication technologies in human contexts. Center for Social Informatics, Indiana University.
90. Kling, R., &, Scacchi, W., (1982). The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. Advances in computers, 21, 1-90. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065245808605677
91. Kraut, R., &, Streeter, L., (1995). Coordination in software development. Communications of the ACM, 38 (3), 69-81.
92. Krippendorff, K., (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
93. Laffey, J., Amelung, C., &, Goggins, S.P., (2009). A context awareness system for online learning: Design based research. International Journal on E-Learning, 8 (3), 313-330.
94. Laffey, J., Amelung, C., Tsai, I.-C., Hong, R.-Y., Goggins, S.P., Reid, D., &, Turner, P., (2008). Design research for context awareness. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2008 (in review), Florence, Italy.
95. Laffey, J., Galyen, K., Reid, D., &, Goggins, S.P., (2012). Measurements of Group Social Interaction in an Online Medical Software Support Community, in development.
96. Laffey, J., Lin, G.Y., &, Lin, Y., (2006). Assessing social ability in online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17 (2), 163-177.
97. Lamb, R., &, Sawyer, S., (2005). On extending social informatics from a rich legacy of networks and conceptual resources. Information Technology & People, 18 (1), 9-20. doi: 10.1108/09593840510584595
98. Lampe, C., Ellison, Ni. B., &, Steinfield, C., (2008). Changes in User Perception of Facebook. In Proceedings of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Diego, CA, (pp. 721-730).
99. Laumann, E.O., (2006). A 45-Year Retrospective on Doing Networks. Connections, 27 (1), 65-90.
100. Laumann, E.O., &, L.P., S., (1997). Measuring social networks using samples, Is network analysis relevant to survey research. In, J. Bancroft, (Ed.), Researching sexual behavior: Methodological issues (pp. 390-416). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
101. Laumann, E.O., Marsden, P.V., &, Prensky, D., (1989). The boundary specification problem in network analysis. Research methods in social network analysis, 61, 87.
102. Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A.L., Brewer, D.,., Van Alstyne, M., (2009). Social science. Computational social science. Science, 323 (5915), 721-723. doi: 10.1126/science.1167742
103. Leinonen, P., Jarvela, S., &, Hakkinen, P., (2005). Conceptualizing the awareness of collaboration: A qualitative study of a global virtual team. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14, 301-322.
104. Liu, P.-J., Laffey, J., &, Cox, K., (2008). Operationallization of Technology Use and Cooperation in CSCW. In Proceedings of the CSCW, San Diego, CA, (pp. 505-514).
105. Mascaro, C., &, Goggins, S.P., (2011a). Brewing Up Citizen Engagement: The Coffee Party on Facebook. In Proceedings of Communities and Technologies 2011, Brisbane, Australia, (pp. 11-20).
106. Mascaro, C., &, Goggins, S.P., (2011b). The Daily Brew: The Structural Evolution of the Coffee Party on Facebook During the 2010 United States Midterm Election Season. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Political Networks Conference, Ann Arbor, MI.
107. Mascaro, C., &, Goggins, S.P., (2013). Coffee or Tea: The Emergence of Networks of Discourse in Two Online Political Groups. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, accepted.
108. Mascaro, C.M., Novak, A., &, Goggins, S.P., (2012). Shepherding and Censorship: Discourse Management in the Tea Party Patriots Facebook Group. In Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea, Maui, HI, (pp. 2563-2572).
109. McGrath, J.E., (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Retrieved from http://users.ece.utexas.edu/~perry/education/382v-s08/papers/mcgrath84.pdf
110. McGrath, J.E., (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1 (1), 7. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/ journals/gdn/1/1/7/
111. Mead, M., (1934). Kinship in the admiralty islands. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=8Fyj0h0G-OUC&oi= fnd&pg=PR9&dq=mead+"small+group"+"M+mead"&ots= -7aKCAORBO&sig=IzsWex2tPvK2vmGGWBpfm-6OFXs
112. Mead, M., (1958). Cultural determinants of behavior. Behavior and evolution, 480-503.
113. Miksa, S.D., Burnett, K., Bonnici, L.J., &, Kim, J., (2007). The development of a facet analysis system to identify and measure the dimensions of interaction in online learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (11), 1569-1577. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890
114. Miller, J.H., &, Page, S.E., (2007). Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
115. Naaman, M., Becker, H., &, Gravano, L., (2011). Hip and trendy: Characterizing emerging trends on Twitter. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.21489/full
116. Nardi, B., (1996). Context and consciousness. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
117. Nardi, B., &, Harris, J., (2006). Strangers and friends: Collaborative play in World of Warcraft. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Banff, Alberta, Canada, (pp. 149-158).
118. Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., &, Schwarz, H., (2002). NetWORKers and their activity in Intensional Networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 205-242.
119. Neale, D.C., Carroll, J.M., &, Rosson, M.B., (2004). Evaluating computer-supported cooperative work: models and frameworks. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chicago, IL, (pp. 112-121).
120. Novak, A., &, Mascaro, C., (2012). Ti-Squaring around: An analysis of e-jargon and group roles in an online community. In Proceedings of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Boston, MA.
121. Ocker, R.J., &, Fjermestad, J., (2008). Communication differences in virtual teams: Findings from a multi-method analysis of high and low performing experimental teams. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 39 (1), 51-68.
122. Olson, G.M., Atkins, D.E., Clauer, R., Finholt, T.A., Jahanian, F., Killeen, T.L.,., Weymouth, T., (1998). The upper atmospheric research collaboratory (UARC). interactions, 5 (3), 48-55. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=275269.275276&dl=portal&dl= ACM&idx=J373&part=periodical&WantType=periodical&title= interactions
123. Olson, G.M., Herbsleb, J.D., &, Rueter, H.H., (1994). Characterizing the sequential structure of interactive behaviors through statistical and grammatical techniques. Human-Computer Interaction, 9 (4), 427-472.
124. Olson, G.M., Malone, T.W., &, Smith, J.B., (Eds.). (2001). Coordination theory and collaboration technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
125. Olson, G.M., &, Olson, J.S., (2000). Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction, 139-178.
126. Olson, G., Olson, J., &, Venolia, G., (2009). What still matters about distance. In Proceedings of the HCIC. Retrieved from http://research. microsoft.com/pubs/78697/olson9370.pdf
127. Olson, J.S., Olson, G.M., Storrøsten, M., &, Carter, M., (1992). How a group-editor changes the character of a design meeting as well as its outcome. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, (pp. 91-98).
128. Parigi, P., &, Bearman, P.S., (2005). Cloning headless frogs and other important matters: Conversation topics and network structure. Social Forces, 83 (2), 535-557. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/sof/ summary/v083/83.2bearman.html
129. Powell, A., Piccoli, G., &, Ives, B., (2004). Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 35 (1), 6-36.
130. Roberts, T.L., Lowry, P.B., &, Sweeney, P.D., (2006). An evaluation of the impact of social presence through group size and the use of collaborative software on group member "voice" in face-to-face and computer-mediated task groups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49 (1), 28-43.
131. Roethlisberger, F.J., Dickson, W.J., &, Wright, H.A., (1939). Management and the worker: An account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.getcited.org/pub/101170564
132. Rohde, M., Klamma, R., Jarke, M., &, Wulf, V., (2007). Reality is our laboratory: communities of practice in applied computer science. Behaviour and Information Technology, 26 (1), 81-94.
133. Sacks, H., (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. Studies in social interaction, 3, 74.
134. Saunders, C.S., &, Ahuja, M.K., (2006). Are all distributed teams the same. Small Group Research, 37 (6), 662-700.
135. Sawyer, S., (2009). Advancing social informatics. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Social Informatics Research Symposium on "People, Information, Technology: The Social Analysis of Computing in a Diverse and Pluralistic World," ASIST Special interest group on social informatics, Vancouver, BC.
136. Sawyer, S., &, Tapia, A., (2007). From findings to theories: institutionalizing social informatics. The Information Society, 23 (4), 263-275. doi: 10.1080/01972240701444196
137. Schmidt, K., &, Bannon, L., (1992). Taking CSCW seriously. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1 (1), 7-40.
138. Schmidt, K., &, Wagner, I., (2004). Ordering systems: Coordinative practices and artifacts in architectural design and planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 13 (5), 349-408.
139. Scott, J., (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
140. Semar, W., (2005). Development of a benchmark system for analyzing collaborative group performance as part of an educational online knowledge management system. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering-IKE, Las Vegas, NV, (Vol. 5, pp. 53-59).
141. Sonnenwald, D.H., (1999). Evolving perspectives of human information behavior: Contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons. In, T. Wilson, &, D. Allen, (Eds.), Exploring the contexts of information behavior (pp. 176-190). London, UK: Taylor Graham.
142. Sonnenwald, D.H., (2005). Information Horizons. In, K. Fischer, S. Erdelez, &, L.E.F. McKechnie, (Eds.), Theories of information behavior (pp. 191-197). Medford, NJ: ASIS&T.
143. Sonnenwald, D.H., Lassi, M., Olson, N., Ponti, M., &, Axelsson, A.-S., (2009). Exploring new ways of working using virtual research environments in library and information science. Library Hi Tech, 27 (2), 191-204. doi: 10.1108/07378830910968155
144. Stahl, G., (2002). Contributions to a theoretical framework for CSCL. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, Boulder, CO, (pp. 62-71).
145. Stahl, G., (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
146. Stahl, G., (2009a). For a science of group interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL (pp. 129-138).
147. Stahl, G., (2009b). Meaning making in VMT. Retrieved from http://www.ischool.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/vmt/book/26.pdf
148. Stahl, G., (2009c). Toward a science of group cognition. Retrieved from http://www.ischool.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/vmt/book/28.pdf
149. Star, S.L., &, Griesemer, J.R., (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
150. Star, S.L., &, Strauss, A., (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 9-30.
151. Straus, A., (1993). Continual permutations of action. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
152. Suthers, D.D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., &, Vatrapu, R., (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5 (1), 5-42. doi: 10.1007/s11412-009-9081-9
153. Tajfel, H., (1978). Differentiation between social groups. New York, NY: Academic Press.
154. Tajfel, H., (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
155. Teasley, S.D., Covi, L.A., Krishnan, M.S., &, Olson, J.S., (2002). Rapid software development through team collocation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 671-683.
156. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., &, Paltoglou, G., (2011a). Sentiment in Twitter events. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi. 21462/full
157. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., &, Paltoglou, G., (2011b). Sentiment strength detection for the social web. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.21662/full
158. Travica, B., (2005). Information view of organization. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 14 (3), 1-20.
159. Tsai, I.C., Kim, B., Liu, P.J., Goggins, S.P., Kumalasari, C., &, Laffey, J.M., (2008). Building a model explaining the social nature of online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (3), 198-215.
160. Turner, J.C., Brown, R.J., &, Tajfel, H., (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favoritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187-204.
161. Turner, W., Bowker, G.C., Gasser, L., &, Zacklad, M., (2006). Information infrastructures for distributed collective practices. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15, 93-110.
162. Twidale, M., &, Nichols, D., (1998). A survey of applications of CSCW for digital libraries: Technical Report CSEG/4/1998. Retrieved from http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/53451/
163. Valente, T.W., (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18 (1), 69-89. Retrieved from http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378873395002561
164. Wasserman, S., (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. books.google.com,.
165. Wenger, E., (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
166. Whittaker, S., (1996). Talking to strangers: An evaluation of the factors affecting electronic collaboration. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Cambridge, MA, (pp. 409-418).
167. Wiggins, A., (2011). eBirding: technology adoption and the transformation of leisure into science. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, Seattle, WA, (pp. 798-799).
168. Yuan, C.Y., Gay, G., &, Hembrooke, H., (2006). Focused activities and the development of social capital in a distributed learning "community." The Information Society, 22, 25-39.