Counterbalance of ligand-and self-coupled motions characterizes multispecificity of Ubiquitin

Protein Science

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 168-178

  Dasgupta, Bhaskar ^a   Nakamura, Haruki ^a   Kinjo, Akira R ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Coupling of receptor ligand motions; Date hub protein; Functional modes in unbound condition; Ligand multispecificity; Normal mode analysis; Ubiquitin

Indexed keywords

HETERODIMER; LIGAND; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; UBIQUITIN;

ARTICLE; ENTROPY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; ENTROPY; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOTION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 84874060893     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: 1469896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.2195     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Deeds E, Ashenberg O, Gerardine J, Shakhnovich E (2007) Robust protein-protein interactions in crowded cellular environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 14952-14957.
2. Cho K, Lee K, Lee KH, Kim D, Lee D (2006) Specificity of molecular interactions in transient protein-protein interaction interfaces. Proteins 65:593-606.
3. Vakser IA (2004) Protein-protein interfaces are special. Structure 12:910-912.
4. Keskin O, Gursoy A, Ma B, Nussinov R (2008) Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact?Chem Rev 108: 1225-1244.
5. Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P, Rodier F, Janin J (2004) A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 336:943-955.
6. Bai H, Ma W, Liu S, Lai L (2008) Dynamic property is a key determinant for protein-protein interactions. Proteins 70:1323-1331.
7. Henzler-Wildman K, Kern D (2007) Dynamic personalities of proteins. Nature 450:964-972.
8. Miller DW, Agard DA (1999) Enzyme specificity under dynamic control: a normal mode analysis of alpha-lytic protease. J Mol Biol 286:267-278.
9. Wells JA, McClendon CL (2007) Reaching for highhanging fruit in drug discovery at protein-protein interfaces. Nature 450:1001-1009.
10. Schreiber G, Keating AE (2011) Protein binding specificity versus promiscuity. Curr Opin Struct Biol 21:50-61.
11. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi A-L, Oltvai ZN (2001) Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411:41-42.
12. Han J-DJ, Bertin N, Hao T, Goldberg DS, Berriz GF, Zhang LV, Dupuy D, Walhout AJM, Cusick ME, Roth FP, Vidal M (2004) Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 430:88-93.
13. Kim PM, Lu LJ, Xia Y, Gerstein MB (2006) Relating three-dimensional structures to protein networks provides evolutionary insights. Science 314:1938-1941.
14. Kim PM, Sboner A, Xia Y, Gerstein M (2008) The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis. Mol Syst Biol 4:179.
15. Tyagi M, Shoemaker BA, Bryant SH, Panchenko AR (2009) Exploring functional roles of multibinding protein interfaces. Protein Sci 18:1674-1683.
16. Dasgupta B, Nakamura H, Kinjo AR (2011) Distinct roles of overlapping and non-overlapping regions of hub protein interfaces in recognition of multiple partners. J Mol Biol 411:713-727.
17. Perica T, Chothia C (2010) Ubiquitin-molecular mechanisms for recognition of different structures. Curr Opin Struct Biol 20:367-376.
18. Long D, Bru schweiler R (2011) In silico elucidation of the recognition dynamics of ubiquitin. PLoS Comput Biol 7:9.
19. Sanejouand YH (1996) Normal-mode analysis suggests important flexibility between the two N-terminal domains of CD4 and supports the hypothesis of a conformational change in CD4 upon HIV binding. Protein Eng Des Sel 9:671-677.
20. Tama F, Sanejouand YH (2001) Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. Protein Eng Des Sel 14:1-6.
21. Ahmed A, Villinger S, Gohlke H (2010) Large-scale comparison of protein essential dynamics from molecular dynamics simulations and coarse-grained normal mode analyses. Proteins 78:3341-3352.
22. Kitao A, Go N (1999) Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space. Curr Opin Struct Biol 9: 164-169.
23. Zheng W, Brooks BR, Thirumalai D (2006) Low-frequency normal modes that describe allosteric transitions in biological nanomachines are robust to sequence variations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 7664-7669.
24. Marcos E, Crehuet R, Bahar I (2011) Changes in dynamics upon oligomerization regulate substrate binding and allostery in amino acid kinase family members. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1002201.
25. Meireles L, Gur M, Bakan A, Bahar I (2011) Pre-existing soft modes of motion uniquely defined by native contact topology facilitate ligand binding to proteins. Protein Sci 20:1645-1658.
26. Wako H, Endo S (2011) Ligand-induced conformational change of a protein reproduced by a linear combination of displacement vectors obtained from normal mode analysis. Biophys Chem 159:257-266.
27. Tirion M (1996) Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 77:1905-1908.
28. Wilson EB, Decius JC, Cross PC (1955) Molecular Vibrations: The Theory of Infrared and Raman Vibrational Spectra. McGraw-Hill, New York; p. 394.
29. Zheng W, Brooks BR (2005) Probing the local dynamics of nucleotide-binding pocket coupled to the global dynamics: myosin versus kinesin. Biophys J 89:167-178.
30. Ishida H, Jochi Y, Kidera A (1998) Dynamic structure of subtilisin-eglin c complex studied by normal mode analysis. Proteins 32:324-333.
31. Standley DM, Kinjo AR, Kinoshita K, Nakamura H (2008) Protein structure databases with new web services for structural biology and biomedical research. Briefings Bioinf 9:276-285.
32. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247:536-540.
33. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, Pang N, Forslund K, Ceric G, Clements J, Heger A, Holm L, Sonnhammer ELL, Eddy SR, Bateman A (2011) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 40:290-301.
34. Sloper-Mould KE, Jemc JC, Pickart CM, Hicke L (2001) Distinct functional surface regions on ubiquitin. J Biol Chem 276:30483-30489.
35. Kinjo AR, Nakamura H (2010) Geometric similarities of protein-protein interfaces at atomic resolution are only observed within homologous families: an exhaustive structural classification study. J Mol Biol 399: 526-540.
36. Tsuchiya Y, Kinoshita K, Endo S, Wako H (2012) Dynamic features of homodimer interfaces calculated by normal-mode analysis. Protein Sci 21:1503-1513.
37. Garner TP, Strachan J, Shedden EC, Long JE, Cavey JR, Shaw B, Layfield R, Searle MS (2011) Independent interactions of ubiquitin-binding domains in a ubiquitin-mediated ternary complex. Biochemistry 50: 9076-9087.
38. Ma J (2005) Usefulness and limitations of normal mode analysis in modeling dynamics of biomolecular complexes. Structure 13:373-380.
39. Ikeguchi M, Ueno J, Sato M, Kidera A (2005) Protein structural change upon ligand binding: linear response theory. Phys Rev Lett 94:078102.
40. Zheng W, Doniach S (2003) A comparative study of motor-protein motions by using a simple elastic-network model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13253-13258.
41. Koga N, Takada S (2006) Folding-based molecular simulations reveal mechanisms of the rotary motor F1-ATPase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:5367-5372.
42. Dobbins SE, Lesk VI, Sternberg MJE (2008) Insights into protein flexibility: The relationship between normal modes and conformational change upon proteinprotein docking. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 10390-10395.
43. Gibrat JF, Go N (1990) Normal mode analysis of human lysozyme: study of the relative motion of the two domains and characterization of the harmonic motion. Proteins 8:258-279.
44. Cuff AL, Sillitoe I, Lewis T, Clegg AB, Rentzsch R, Furnham N, Pellegrini-Calace M, Jones D, Thornton J, Orengo CA (2011) Extending CATH: increasing coverage of the protein structure universe and linking structure with function. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D420-D426.
45. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM (1997) CATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5: 1093-1108.
46. Zen A, Micheletti C, Keskin O, Nussinov R (2010) Comparing interfacial dynamics in protein-protein complexes: an elastic network approach. BMC Struct Biol 10:26.
47. Haliloglu T, Seyrek E, Erman B (2008) Prediction of binding sites in receptor-ligand complexes with the Gaussian Network Model. Phys Rev Lett 100:228102.
48. Lange OF, Lakomek N-A, Fares C, Schroder GF, Walter KFA, Becker S, Meiler J, Grubmu ller H, Griesinger C, De Groot BL (2008) Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an RDC-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution. Science 320:1471-1475.
49. Wlodarski T, Zagrovic B (2009) Conformational selection and induced fit mechanism underlie specificity in noncovalent interactions with ubiquitin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19346-19351.
50. Kitahara R, Yokoyama S, Akasaka K (2005) NMR snapshots of a fluctuating protein structure: ubiquitin at 30 bar-3 kbar. J Mol Biol 347:277-285.
51. Kitahara R, Yamada H, Akasaka K (2001) Two folded conformers of ubiquitin revealed by high-pressure NMR. Biochemistry 40:13556-13563.
52. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) ClustalW and ClustalX version Bioinformatics 23:2947-2948.
53. Diamond R (1988) A note on the rotational superposition problem. Acta Cryst. 44:211-216.
54. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM (1993) ''NACCESS'', Computer Program
55. Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22:2577-2637.