Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 164-169

  Kitao, Akio ^a   Go, Nobuhiro ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LYSOZYME; PROTEIN;

INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; REVIEW;

EID: 0033117937     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)80023-2     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. 2 in noncrystalline environments show a subunit transition from the open to the closed conformation. Protein Sci 1996, 5:62-71.
2. de Groot BL, Hayward S, van Aalten DMF, Amadei A, Berendsen HJC: Domain motions in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme: A comparison between molecular dynamics and crystallographic data. Proteins 1998, 31:116-127. Using the concept of a dynamic domain, the large hinge-bending motion observed from MD was compared with and was found to be similar to variations of conformations seen in various crystal environments and mutants.
3. Kidera A, Inaka K, Matsushima M, Go N: Normal mode refinement: Crystallographic refinement of protein dynamic structure. II. Application to human lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1992, 225:477-486.
4. Kidera A, Go N: Refinement of protein dynamic structure: Normal mode refinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990, 87:3718-3722.
5. Kidera A, Go N: Normal mode refinement: Crystallographic refinement of protein dynamic structure. I. Theory and test by simulated diffraction data. J Mol Biol 1992, 225:457-475.
6. Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC: Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 1993, 17:412-425.
7. Balsera MA, Wriggers W, Oono Y, Schulten K: Principal component analysis and long time protein dynamics. J Phys Chem 1996, 100:2567-2572.
8. Teeter MM, Case DA: Harmonic and quasiharmonic descriptions of crambin. J Phys Chem 1990, 94:8091-8097.
9. Kitao A, Go N: Conformational dynamics of polypeptides and proteins in the dihedral angle space and in the Cartesian coordinate space: Normal mode analysis of deca-alanine. J Comput Chem 1991, 12:359-368.
10. Kitao A, Hayward S, Go N: Comparison of normal mode analyses on a small globular protein in dihedral angle space and Cartesian coordinate space. Biophys Chem 1994, 52:107-114.
11. Kitao A, Hirata F, Go N: The effects of solvent on the conformation and the collective motions of protein: Normal mode analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of melittin in water and in vacuum. Chem Phys 1991, 158:447-472.
12. Hayward S, Kitao A, Hirata F, Go N: Effect of solvent on collective motions in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1993, 234:1207-1217.
13. Kitao A, Hayward S, Nobuhiro G: Energy landscape of a native protein: Jumping-among-minima model. Proteins 1998, 33:496-517. The physical nature of an energy landscape was investigated using a jumping-among-minima model. The mutual similarity of the conformational substates, the distribution of conformational substates, the multidimensional space and the hierarchy of conformational substates are discussed.
14. de Groot BL, van Aalten DMF, Amadei A, Berendsen HJC: The consistency of large concerted motions in proteins in molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J 1996, 71:1707-1713.
15. Hayward S, Go N: Collective variable description of native protein dynamics. Annu Rev Phys Chem 1995, 46:223-250.
16. Levy RM, Srinivasan AR, Olson WK, McCammon JA: Quasiharmonic method for studying very low frequency modes in proteins. Biopolymers 1984, 23:1099-1112.
17. Hayward S: Normal mode analysis of biological molecules. In Computational Biochemistry and Biophysics. Edited by Becker OM, MacKerell AD Jr, Roux B, Watanabe M. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1999:in press.
18. Tirion MM: Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 1996, 77:1905-1908.
19. Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Erman B: Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Fold Des 1997, 2:173-181. An elastic network model was proposed and was applied to predict X-ray B-factors. The atomic fluctuations of 12 different molecules calculated using this simplified model are in good agreement with the B-factors.
20. Troyer JM, Cohen FE: Protein conformational landscapes: Energy minimization and clustering of a long molecular dynamics trajectory. Proteins 1995, 23:97-110.
21. Horiuchi T, Go N: Projection of Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics trajectories onto the normal mode axes: Human lysozyme. Proteins 1991, 10:106-116.
22. Hayward S, Kitao A, Go N: Harmonicity and anharmonicity in protein dynamics: A normal mode analysis and principal component analysis. Proteins 1995, 23:177-186.
23. Abagyan R, Argos P: Optimal protocol and trajectory visualization for conformational searches of peptides and proteins. J Mol Biol 1992, 225:519-532.
24. Garcia AE: Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins. Phys Rev Lett 1992, 68:2696-2699.
25. 10-/α-helix transition: Implications for a natural reaction coordinate. J Am Chem Soc 1994, 116:6307-6315.
26. Garcia AE, Soumpasis DM, Jovin TM: Dynamics and relative stabilities of parallel- and antiparallel-stranded DNA duplexes. Biophys J 1994, 66:1742-1755.
27. van Aalten DMF, Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Eijsink VGH, Vriend G, Berendsen HJC: The essential dynamics of thermolysin: Confirmation of the hinge-bending motion and comparison of simulations in vacuum and water. Proteins 1995, 22:45-54.
28. Nadig G, Vishveshwara S: Effects of substrate binding on the dynamics of RNase A: Molecular dynamics simulations of UpA bound and native RNase A. Biopolymers 1997, 42:505-520.
29. Laatikanien R, Saarela J, Tuppurainen K, Hassinen T: Internal motions of native lysozyme are more organized than those of mutants: A principal component analysis of molecular dynamics data. Biophys Chem 1998, 73:1-5.
30. Kitao A, Hirata F, Go N: Effects of solvent on the conformation and the collective motions of a protein. 2. Structure of hydration in melittin. J Phys Chem 1993, 97:10223-10230.
31. Kitao A, Hirata F, Go N: Effects of solvent on the conformation and the collective motions of a protein. 3. Free energy analysis by the extended RISM theory. J Phys Chem 1993, 97:10231-10235.
32. Andrews BK, Romo T, Clarage JB, Pettitt BM, Phillips GN Jr: Characterizing global substates of myoglobin. Structure 1998, 6:587-594.
33. Lamm G, Szabo A: Langevin modes of macromolecules. J Chem Phys 1986, 85:7334-7348.
34. Kottalam J, Case DA: Langevin modes of macromolecules: Applications to crambin and DNA hexamers. Biopolymers 1990, 29:1409-1421.
35. Ichiye T, Karplus M: Collective motions in proteins: A covariance analysis of atomic fluctuations in molecular dynamics and normal mode simulations. Proteins 1991, 11:205-217.
36. Caves LSD, Evanseck JD, Karplus M: Locally accessible conformations of proteins: Multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin. Protein Sci 1998, 7:649-666. The problems of sampling were discussed using multiple molecular dynamics trajectories. As simulation length is limited, it is important to find an effective way of sampling conformational space, as discussed in this paper.
37. Hansmann UHE, Okamoto Y: Prediction of peptide conformation by multicanonical algorithm: New approach to the multiple-minima problem. J Comput Chem 1993, 14:1333-1338.
38. Nakajima N, Nakamura H, Kidera A: Multicanonical ensemble generated by molecular dynamics simulation for enhanced conformational sampling of peptides. J Phys Chem B 1997, 101:807-824.
39. Shirai H, Nakajima N, Higo J, Kidera A, Nakamura H: Conformational sampling of CDR-H3 in antibodies by multicanonical molecular dynamics simulation. J Mol Biol 1998, 275:481 -496.
40. Becker OM: Principal coordinate maps of molecular potential energy surfaces. J Comput Chem 1998, 19:1255-1267.
41. Elber R, Karplus M: Multiple conformational states of proteins: A molecular dynamics analysis of myoglobin. Science 1987, 235:318-321.
42. Noguti T, Go N: Structural basis of hierarchical multiple substates of a protein. I: Introduction. Proteins 1989, 5:97-103.
43. Noguti T, Go N: Structural basis of hierarchical multiple substates of a protein. II: Monte Carlo simulation of native thermal fluctuations and energy minimization. Proteins 1989, 5:104-112.
44. Noguti T, Go N: Structural basis of hierarchical multiple substates of a protein. III: Side chain and main chain local conformations. Proteins 1989, 5:113-124.
45. Noguti T, Go N: Structural basis of hierarchical multiple substates of a protein. IV: Rearrangements in atom packing and local deformations. Proteins 1989, 5:125-131.
46. Noguti T, Go N: Structural basis of hierarchical multiple substates of a protein. V: Nonlocal deformations. Proteins 1989, 5:132-138.
47. Hayward S, Kitao A, Go N: Harmonic and anharmonic effects in the dynamics of BPTI: A normal mode analysis and principal component analysis. Protein Sci 1994, 3:936-943.
48. Janežič D, Veneble RM, Brooks BR: Harmonic analysis of large systems. III. Comparison with molecular dynamics. J Comput Chem 1995, 16:1554-1566.
49. Garcia AE, Blumenfeld R, Hummer G, Krumhasl JA: Multi-basin dynamics of a protein in a crystal environment. Physica D 1997, 107:225-239. A high quality and lengthy (5.1 ns) molecular dynamics simulation of crambin was carried out using a particle mesh ewald summation. Two different types of transitions between minima have been observed: relatively short dynamics occurred in 5 to 800 ps and longer timescale dynamics occurred in 2 ns and longer.
50. Hayward S, Kitao A, Berendsen HJC: Model-free methods of analyzing domain motions in proteins from simulations: A comparison of normal mode analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of lysozyme. Proteins 1997, 27:425-437.
51. Wriggers W, Schulten K: Protein domain movements: Detection of rigid domains and visualization of hinges in comparisons of atomic coordinates. Proteins 1997, 29:1-14.
52. Hayward S, Berendsen HJC: Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: New results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme. Proteins 1998, 30:144-154. A new and consistent methodology was introduced in order to analyze conformational changes in proteins for dynamic domains, hinge axes and hinge-bending residues. Its application has led to new insights into the motions of T4 lysozyme and citrate synthase.
53. Basu G, Kitao A, Kuki A, Go N: Protein electron transfer reorganization energy spectrum from normal mode analysis. 1. Theory. J Phys Chem B 1998, 11:2076-2084. A new analytical model for describing the coupling of protein fluctuations to electron transfer is proposed using normal modes. It allows a direct connection between actual protein motion and electron transfer to be made.
54. Basu G, Kitao A, Kuki A, Go N: Protein electron transfer reorganization energy spectrum from normal mode analysis. 2. Application to ru-modified cytochrome c. J Phys Chem B 1998, 11:2085-2094. The application of the method described in [53•] to Ru-modified cytochrome c. There are no special modes that make a dominant contribution to the electron transfer reorganization energy. This may be an important feature of the electron transfer process, in contrast to other cases [1, 2•], in which a few collective modes are functionally relevant.
55. Schulten K, Tesch M: Coupling of protein motion to electron transfer - Molecular-dynamics and stochastic quantum-mechanics study of photosynthetic reaction centers. Chem Phys 1991, 158:421-446.
56. Noguti T, Go N: Efficient Monte Carlo method for simulation of fluctuating conformations of native proteins. Biopolymers 1985, 24:527-546.
57. Amadei A, Linssen ABM, de Groot BL, van Aalten DMF, Berendsen HJC: An efficient method for sampling the essential subspace of proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1996, 13:615-625.
58. Kinoshita M, Okamoto Y, Hirata F: Calculation of hydration free energy for a solute with many atomic sites using the RISM theory: A robust and efficient algorithm. J Comput Chem 1997, 18:1320-1326.
59. Diamond R: On the use of normal modes in thermal parameter refinement: Theory and application to the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Acta Crystallogr A 1990, 46:425-435.
60. Bruschweiler R, Case DA: Collective NMR relaxation model applied to protein dynamics. Phys Rev Lett 1994, 72:940-943.
61. Abseher R, Horstink L, Hilbers CW, Nilges M: Essential spaces defined by NMR structure ensembles and molecular dynamics simulation show significant overlap. Proteins 1998, 31:370-382.
62. Sunada S, Go N, Koehl P: Calculation of nuclear magnetic resonance order parameters in proteins by normal mode analysis. J Chem Phys 1996, 104:4768-4775.
63. Sunada S, Go N: Calculation of nuclear magnetic resonance order parameters in proteins by normal mode analysis. II. Contribution from localized high frequency motions. J Chem Phys 1996, 105:6560-6564.
64. Lamy AV, Smith JC, Yunoki J, Parker SF, Kataoka M: High-resolution vibrational inelastic neutron scattering: A new spectroscopic tool for globular proteins. J Am Chem Soc 1997, 119:9268-9273. A high-resolution spectrum measured by inelastic neutron scattering was shown to be in good agreement with the spectrum calculated using normal mode analysis. This indicates the possibility of using neutron scattering as a tool for investigating protein dynamics in atomic detail.