Students' experiences of learning manual clinical skills through simulation

Advances in Health Sciences Education

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 99-114

  Johannesson, Eva ^a   Silén, Charlotte ^b   Kvist, Joanna ^a   Hult, Håkan ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Learning theory; Professional development; Qualitative content analysis; Simulation; Skills training; Undergraduate nursing education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874021507     PISSN: 13824996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-012-9358-z     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bergmann Tiest, W. M. (2010). Tactial perception of material properties. Vision Research, 50, 2775-2782.
2. Bradley, P. (2006). The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. Medical Education, 40, 254-262.
3. Bray, L., Flynn, A., & Sanders, C. (2011). The experiences of children's nursing students: Learning urethral catheterisation. Nurse Education in Practice, 11(3), 168-172.
4. Cioffi, J., Purcal, N., & Arundell, F. (2005). A pilot study to investigate the effect of a simulation strategy on the clinical decision making of midwifery students. Journal of Nursing Education, 44(3), 185-191.
5. Côté, L., & Turgeon, J. (2005). Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 71-75.
6. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
7. Elliott, D., Grierson, L. E. M., Hayes, S. J., & Lyons, J. (2011). Action representations in perception, motor control and learning: Implications for medical education. Medical Education, 45, 119-131.
8. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105-112.
9. Hatala, R. (2011). Practice makes perfect... sometimes. Medical Education, 45, 114-116.
10. Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrisa, E. R., Gordon, D. L., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27, 10-28.
11. Issenberg, S. B., & Scalese, R. J. (2008). Simulation in health care education. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 51(1), 31-46.
12. Jeffries, P. R. (2005). Guest Editorial. Technology trends in nursing education: Next steps. Journal of Nursing Education, 44(1), 1-4.
13. Johannesson, E., Olsson, M., Petersson, G., & Silén, C. (2010). Learning features in computer simulation skills training. Nurse Education in Practice, 10, 268-273.
14. Jöud, A., Sandholm, A., Alseby, L., Petersson, G., & Nilsson, G. (2010). Feasibility of a computerized male urethral catheterization simulator. Nurse Education in Practice, 10(2), 70-75.
15. Khan, K., Pattison, T., & Sherwood, M. (2011). Simulation in medical education. Medical Teatcher, 33, 1-3.
16. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17. Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. California: Sage Publications.
18. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation (pp. 73-84). New Directions for Program Evaluation, 30. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861-878.
20. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. McGaghie, W. C., & Issenberg, S. B. (2010). A critical review of simulation-based research: 2003-2009. Medical Education, 44, 50-63.
22. Melerit UrecathVision. Product information of the computer simulator UrecathVision. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www. meleritmedical. com.
23. Meyrick, J. (2006). What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(5), 799-808.
24. Murray, C., Grant, M. J., Howarth, M. L., & Leigh, J. (2008). The use of simulation as a teaching and learning approach to support practice learning. Nurse Education in Practice, 8, 5-8.
25. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Gloucester, Mass: Doubleday & Company, Inc.
26. Polit, D. E., & Beck, C. T. (2008). Nursing research. Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
27. Scalese, R. J., Obesco, V. T., & Issenberg, S. B. (2008). Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(Suppl 1), 46-49.
28. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
29. Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M. J. (2007). Motor control. Translating research into clinical practice (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
30. Silén, C. (2003). Responsibility and independence in learning: What is the role of the educators and the framework of the educational programme? In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving student learning-theory, research and practice (pp. 249-262). Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
31. Silén, C. (2006). The tutor's approach in base groups (PBL). Higher Education, 51, 373-385.
32. Stefanidis, D., Scerbo, M. W., Korndorffer, J. R., & Scott, D. J. (2007). Redefining simulator proficiency using automaticity theory. The American Journal of Surgery, 193, 502-506.
33. Tun, J. K., & Kneebone, R. (2011). Bridging worlds: Applying the science of motor learning to clinical education. Medical Education, 45, 111-114.
34. Weidner, T. G., & Popp, J. K. (2007). Peer-assisted learning and orthopaedic evaluation psychomotor skills. Journal of Athletic Training, 42(1), 113-119.
35. Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: A review of influential factors. Medical Education, 44, 75-84.