Tactual perception of material properties

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 24, 2010, Pages 2775-2782

  Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coldness; Compliance; Friction; Roughness; Touch

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; COLD; COMPLIANCE (PHYSICAL); FRICTION; HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; ROUGHNESS; SENSATION; SLIPPERINESS; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION;

ANIMALS; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOUCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 78650225363     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.005     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Benali-Khoudja M., Hafez M., Alexandre J.-M., Benachour J., Kheddar A. Thermal feedback model for virtual reality. Proceedings of international symposium on micromechatronics and human science 2003, 153-158. IEEE.
2. Benali-Khoudja, M., Hafez, M., Alexandre, J. -M., & Kheddar, A. (2003b). Thermal feedback interface requirements for virtual reality. In Proceedings of EuroHaptics (pp. 438-443).
3. Bensmaïa S., Hollins M. Pacinian representations of fine-surface-texture. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67:842-854.
4. Bensmaïa S.J., Hollins M. The vibrations of texture. Somatosensory & Motor Research 2003, 20:33-43.
5. Bergmann Tiest W.M. An experimentally verified model of the perceived 'coldness' of objects. Proceedings of 2nd joint EuroHaptics conference and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems 2007, 61-65. IEEE Computer Society, Tsukuba, Japan.
6. Bergmann Tiest W.M., Kappers A.M.L. Analysis of haptic perception of materials by multidimensional scaling and physical measurements of roughness and compressibility. Acta Psychologica 2006, 121:1-20.
7. Bergmann Tiest W.M., Kappers A.M.L. Haptic and visual perception of roughness. Acta Psychologica 2007, 124:177-189.
8. Bergmann Tiest W.M., Kappers A.M.L. Thermosensory reversal effect quantified. Acta Psychologica 2008, 127:46-50.
9. Bergmann Tiest W.M., Kappers A.M.L. Cues for haptic perception of compliance. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 2009, 2:189-199.
10. Bergmann Tiest W.M., Kappers A.M.L. Tactile perception of thermal diffusivity. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 2009, 71:481-489.
11. Bicchi A., Scilingo E.P., De Rossi D. Haptic discrimination of softness in teleoperation: The role of the contact area spread rate. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 2000, 16:496-504.
12. Businger J.A., Buettner K.J.K. Thermal contact coefficient (a term proposed for use in heat transfer). Journal of Meteorology 1961, 18:422.
13. Cadoret G., Smith A.M. Friction, not texture, dictates grip forces used during object manipulation. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 75:1963-1969.
14. Campion G., Hayward V. On the synthesis of haptic textures. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 2008, 24:527-536.
15. Connor C.E., Hsiao S.S., Phillips J.R., Johnson K.O. Tactile roughness: Neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates. Journal of Neuroscience 1990, 10:3823-3836.
16. Coppen F.M.V. The differential threshold for the subjective judgement of the elastic and plastic properties of soft bodies. British Journal of Psychology 1942, 32:231-247.
17. Deml, B., Mihalyi, A., & Hannig, G. (2006). Development and experimental evaluation of a thermal display. In Proceedings of EuroHaptics 2006 (pp. 257-262).
18. Dyck P.J., Curtis D.J., Bushek W., Offord K. Description of Minnesota Thermal Disks and normal values of cutaneous thermal discrimination in man. Neurology 1974, 24:325-330.
19. Ekman G., Hosman J., Lindström B. Roughness, smoothness and preference: A study of quantitative relations in individual subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1965, 70:18-26.
20. Freyberger, F. K. B., & Färber, B. (2006). Compliance discrimination of deformable objects by squeezing with one and two fingers. In Proceedings of EuroHaptics 2006 (pp. 271-276).
21. Friedman R.M., Hester K.D., Green B.G., LaMotte R.H. Magnitude estimation of softness. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 191:133-142.
22. Grierson L.E.M., Carnahan H. Manual exploration and the perception of slipperiness. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:1070-1081.
23. Harper R., Stevens S.S. Subjective hardness of compliant materials. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1964, 16:204-215.
24. Havenith G., Van de Linde E.J.G., Heus R. Pain, thermal sensation and cooling rates of hands while touching cold materials. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 1992, 65:43-51.
25. Heller M.A. Texture perception in sighted and blind observers. Perception & Psychophysics 1989, 45:49-54.
26. Ho H., Jones L.A. Material identification using real and simulated thermal cues. Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society 2004, 2462-2465. IEEE, San Francisco, CA.
27. Ho H., Jones L.A. Contribution of thermal cues to material discrimination and localization. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:118-128.
28. Ho H., Jones L.A. Thermal model for hand-object interactions. Proceedings of 14th symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems 2006, 461-467. IEEE.
29. Ho H.-N., Jones L.A. Development and evaluation of a thermal display for material identification and discrimination. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2007, 4. (Article 13).
30. Hollins M., Bensmaïa S., Karlof K., Young F. Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:1534-1544.
31. Hollins M., Bensmaïa S.J. The coding of roughness. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 61:184-195.
32. Hollins M., Bensmaïa S.J., Washburn S. Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures. Somatosensory & Motor Research 2001, 18:253-262.
33. Hollins M., Faldowski R., Rao S., Young F. Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 1993, 54:697-705.
34. Hollins M., Lorenz F., Harper D. Somatosensory coding of roughness: The effect of texture adaptation in direct and indirect touch. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:5582-5588.
35. Hollins M., Risner S.R. Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:695-705.
36. Hsiao S.S., Johnson K.O., Twombly I.A. Roughness coding in the somatosensory system. Acta Psychologica 1993, 84:53-67.
37. Ino S., Shimizu S., Odagawa T., Sato M., Takahashi M., Izumi T. A tactile display for presenting quality of materials by changing the temperature of skin surface. Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on robot and human communication 1993, IEEE, Tokyo, Japan.
38. Johansson R.S., Westling G. Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Experimental Brain Research 1984, 56:550-564.
39. Jones L.A., Ho H.-N. Warm or cool, large or small? The challenge of thermal displays. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 2008, 1:53-70.
40. Kahrimanovic M., Bergmann Tiest W.M., Kappers A.M.L. Context effects in haptic perception of roughness. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 194:287-297.
41. Katz D. Der aufbau der tastwelt 1925, springer, Johann Ambrosius Barth, (The world of touch).
42. Klatzky R.L., Lederman S.J. Tactile roughness perception with a rigid link interposed between skin and surface. Perception & Psychophysics 1999, 61:591-607.
43. Kyung, K. -U., & Kwon, D. -S. (2006). Perceived roughness and correlation with frequency and amplitude of vibrotactile stimuli. In Proceedings of EuroHaptics 2006 (pp. 277-282).
44. Lamb G.D. Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: Psychophysical performance measurements in humans. Journal of Physiology 1983, 338:551-565.
45. LaMotte R.H. Softness discrimination with a tool. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000, 83:1777-1786.
46. Lawrence D.A., Pao L.Y., Dougherty A.M., Salada M.A., Pavlou Y. Rate-hardness: A new performance metric for haptic interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 2000, 16:357-371.
47. Lederman S.J. Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: The touching process and effects of macro- and microsurface structure. Perception & Psychophysics 1974, 16:385-395.
48. Lederman S.J. The perception of surface roughness by active and passive touch. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1981, 18:253-255.
49. Lederman S.J. Tactual roughness perception: Spatial and temporal determinants. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1983, 37:498-511.
50. Lederman S.J., Loomis J.M., Williams D.A. The role of vibration in the tactual perception of roughness. Perception & Psychophysics 1982, 32:109-116.
51. Lederman S.J., Taylor M.M. Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch. Perception & Psychophysics 1972, 12:401-408.
52. Loomis J.M., Lederman S.J. Tactual perception. Handbook of perception and human performance 1986, Vol. 2:31.1-31.41. John Wiley & Sons, New York, (chap. 31). K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J.P. Thomas (Eds.).
53. Meenes M., Zigler M.J. An experimental study of the perceptions roughness and smoothness. American Journal of Psychology 1923, 34:542-549.
54. Miyaoka T., Mano T., Ohka M. Mechanisms of fine-surface-texture discrimination in human tactile sensation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999, 105:2485-2492.
55. Provancher W.R., Sylvester N.D. Fingerpad skin stretch increases the perception of virtual friction. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 2009, 2:212-223.
56. Sarda A., Deterre R., Vergneault C. Heat perception measurements of the different parts found in a car passenger compartment. Measurement 2004, 35:65-75.
57. Schneider A.M., Holcombe B.V. Properties influencing coolness to the touch of fabrics. Textile Research Journal 1991, 61:488-494.
58. Scilingo E.P., Bianchi M., Grioli G., Bicchi A. Rendering softness: Integration of kinaesthetic and cutaneous information in haptic devices. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 2010, 3:109-118.
59. Scott Blair G.W., Coppen F.M.V. The subjective judgements of the elastic and plastic properties of soft bodies; the differential thresholds for viscosities and compression moduli. Proceedings of the Royal Society 1939, 128 B:109-125.
60. Smith A.M., Chapman C.E., Deslandes M., Langlais J.-S., Thibodeau M.-P. Role of friction and tangential force variation in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 144:211-223.
61. Smith A.M., Scott S.H. Subjective scaling of smooth surface friction. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 75:1957-1962.
62. Srinivasan M.A., LaMotte R.H. Tactual discrimination of softness. Journal of Neurophysiology 1995, 73:88-101.
63. Srinivasan M.A., Whitehouse J.M., LaMotte R.H. Tactile detection of slip: Surface microgeometry and peripheral neural codes. Journal of Neurophysiology 1990, 63:1323-1332.
64. Stevens S.S., Harris J.R. The scaling of subjective roughness and smoothness. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1962, 64:489-494.
65. Stone L.A. Subjective roughness and smoothness for individual judges. Psychonomic Science 1967, 9:347-348.
66. Taylor M.M., Lederman S.J. Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: A model and the effect of friction. Perception & Psychophysics 1975, 17:23-26.
67. Verrillo R.T., Bolanowski S.J., McGlone F.P. Subjective magnitude of tactile roughness. Somatosensory and Motor Research 1999, 16:352-360.
68. Yamamoto A., Cros B., Hashimoto H., Higuchi T. Control of thermal tactile display based on prediction of contact temperature. Proceedings of international conference on robotics and automation 2004, Vol. 2. IEEE, New Orleans, LA.
69. Zigler M.J. An experimental study of the perception of stickiness. American Journal of Psychology 1923, 34:73-84.