Molecular mechanisms of robustness in plants

Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 62-69

  Lempe, Janne ^a   Lachowiec, Jennifer ^a   Sullivan, Alessandra M ^a   Queitsch, Christine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MERISTEM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PLANT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; REVIEW; SEEDLING;

ARABIDOPSIS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MERISTEM; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANTS; SEEDLING;

ANIMALIA; FUNGI;

EID: 84873736408     PISSN: 13695266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.12.002     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Auffray J.-C. Shape asymmetry and developmental stability. On Growth and Form: Spatiotemporal Patterning in Biology 1999, 310-324. John Wiley & Sons. M.A.J. Chaplain (Ed.).
2. Debat V., David P. Mapping phenotypes:canalization, plasticity and developmental stability. Trends Ecol Evol 2001, 16:555-561.
3. Waddington C.H. Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 1942, 150:563-565.
4. Whitacre J.M. Biological robustness: paradigms, mechanisms, and systems principles. Front Genet 2012, 3:67.
5. Gibson G. Decanalization and the origin of complex disease. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10:134-140.
6. Casanueva M.O., Burga A., Lehner B. Fitness trade-offs and environmentally induced mutation buffering in isogenic C. elegans. Science 2012, 335:82-85.
7. Masel J., Siegal M.L. Robustness: mechanisms and consequences. Trends Genet 2009, 25:395-403.
8. Gibson G., Dworkin I. Uncovering cryptic genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5:681-690.
9. Masel J. Cryptic genetic variation is enriched for potential adaptations. Genetics 2006, 172:1985-1991.
10. Munsky B., Neuert G., van Oudenaarden A. Using gene expression noise to understand gene regulation. Science 2012, 336:183-187.
11. Raser J.M., O'Shea E.K. Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control. Science 2005, 309:2010-2013.
12. Eldar A., Elowitz M.B. Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 2010, 467:167-173.
13. Forde B.G. Is it good noise? The role of developmental instability in the shaping of a root system. J Exp Bot 2009, 60:3989-4002.
14. Mas P., Yanovsky M.J. Time for circadian rhythms: plants get synchronized. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2009, 12:574-579.
15. Clarke G.M. The genetic basis of developmental stability. IV. Individual and population asymmetry parameters. Heredity 1998, 80:553-561.
16. Hall M.C., Dworkin I., Ungerer M.C., Purugganan M. Genetics of microenvironmental canalization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:13717-13722.
17. Jimenez-Gomez J.M., Corwin J.A., Joseph B., Maloof J.N., Kliebenstein D.J. Genomic analysis of QTLs and genes altering natural variation in stochastic noise. PLoS Genet 2011, 7:e1002295.
18. Sangster T.A., Salathia N., Undurraga S., Milo R., Schellenberg K., Lindquist S., Queitsch C. HSP90 affects the expression of genetic variation and developmental stability in quantitative traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:2963-2968.
19. Burga A., Casanueva M.O., Lehner B. Predicting mutation outcome from early stochastic variation in genetic interaction partners. Nature 2011, 480:250-253.
20. Gangaraju V.K., Yin H., Weiner M.M., Wang J., Huang X.A., Lin H. Drosophila Piwi functions in Hsp90-mediated suppression of phenotypic variation. Nat Genet 2011, 43:153-158.
21. Jarosz D.F., Lindquist S. Hsp90 and environmental stress transform the adaptive value of natural genetic variation. Science 2010, 330:1820-1824.
22. Queitsch C., Sangster T.A., Lindquist S. Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature 2002, 417:618-624.
23. Rutherford S.L., Lindquist S. Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature 1998, 396:336-342.
24. Sangster T.A., Salathia N., Lee H.N., Watanabe E., Schellenberg K., Morneau K., Wang H., Undurraga S., Queitsch C., Lindquist S. HSP90-buffered genetic variation is common in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:2969-2974.
25. Sollars V., Lu X., Xiao L., Wang X., Garfinkel M.D., Ruden D.M. Evidence for an epigenetic mechanism by which Hsp90 acts as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nat Genet 2003, 33:70-74.
26. Specchia V., Piacentini L., Tritto P., Fanti L., D'Alessandro R., Palumbo G., Pimpinelli S., Bozzetti M.P. Hsp90 prevents phenotypic variation by suppressing the mutagenic activity of transposons. Nature 2010, 463:662-665.
27. Yeyati P.L., Bancewicz R.M., Maule J., van Heyningen V. Hsp90 selectively modulates phenotype in vertebrate development. PLoS Genet 2007, 3:e43.
28. Levy S.F., Siegal M.L. Network hubs buffer environmental variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 2008, 6:e264.
29. Taipale M., Jarosz D.F., Lindquist S. HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010, 11:515-528.
30. Fu J., Keurentjes J.J.B., Bouwmeester H., America T., Verstappen F.W.A., Ward J.L., Beale M.H., de Vos R.C.H., Dijkstra M., Scheltema R.A., et al. System-wide molecular evidence for phenotypic buffering in Arabidopsis. Nat Genet 2009, 41:166-167.
31. Sangster T.A., Lindquist S., Queitsch C. Under cover: causes, effects and implications of Hsp90-mediated genetic capacitance. BioEssays 2004, 26:348-362.
32. Lehner B., Crombie C., Tischler J., Fortunato A., Fraser A.G. Systematic mapping of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans identifies common modifiers of diverse signaling pathways. Nat Genet 2006, 38:896-903.
33. Doyle M.R., Davis S.J., Bastow R.M., McWatters H.G., Kozma-Bognar L., Nagy F., Millar A.J., Amasino R.M. The ELF4 gene controls circadian rhythms and flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2002, 419:74-77.
34. Kim T.S., Kim W.Y., Fujiwara S., Kim J., Cha J.Y., Park J.H., Lee S.Y., Somers D.E. HSP90 functions in the circadian clock through stabilization of the client F-box protein ZEITLUPE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:16843-16848.
35. Raj A., Rifkin S.A., Andersen E., van Oudenaarden A. Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance. Nature 2010, 463:913-918.
36. Hornstein E., Shomron N. Canalization of development by microRNAs. Nat Genet 2006, 38(Suppl):S20-S24.
37. Rubio-Somoza I., Weigel D. MicroRNA networks and developmental plasticity in plants. Trends Plant Sci 2011, 16:258-264.
38. Sieber P., Wellmer F., Gheyselinck J., Riechmann J.L., Meyerowitz E.M. Redundancy and specialization among plant microRNAs: role of the MIR164 family in developmental robustness. Development 2007, 134:1051-1060.
39. Chitwood D.H., Nogueira F.T.S., Howell M.D., Montgomery T.A., Carrington J.C., Timmermans M.C.P. Pattern formation via small RNA mobility. Genes Dev 2009, 23:549-554.
40. Bowman J.L., Smyth D.R., Meyerowitz E.M. Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development 1991, 112:1-20.
41. Theissen G., Melzer R. Molecular mechanisms underlying origin and diversification of the angiosperm flower. Ann Bot 2007, 100:603-619.
42. Wollmann H., Mica E., Todesco M., Long J.A., Weigel D. On reconciling the interactions between APETALA2, miR172 and AGAMOUS with the ABC model of flower development. Development 2010, 137:3633-3642.
43. Theissen G. Development of floral organ identity: stories from the MADS house. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2001, 4:75-85.
44. Shpak E.D., Berthiaume C.T., Hill E.J., Torii K.U. Synergistic interaction of three ERECTA-family receptor-like kinases controls Arabidopsis organ growth and flower development by promoting cell proliferation. Development 2004, 131:1491-1501.
45. Shpak E.D., McAbee J.M., Pillitteri L.J., Torii K.U. Stomatal patterning and differentiation by synergistic interactions of receptor kinases. Science 2005, 309:290-293.
46. Ordas B., Malvar R.A., Hill W.G. Genetic variation and quantitative trait loci associated with developmental stability and the environmental correlation between traits in maize. Genet Res 2008, 90:385-395.
47. Coluccio M.P., Sanchez S.E., Kasulin L., Yanovsky M.J., Botto J.F. Genetic mapping of natural variation in a shade avoidance response: ELF3 is the candidate gene for a QTL in hypocotyl growth regulation. J Exp Bot 2011, 62:167-176.
48. Jimenez-Gomez J.M., Wallace A.D., Maloof J.N. Network analysis identifies ELF3 as a QTL for the shade avoidance response in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 2010, 6.
49. Undurraga S.F., Press M.O., Legendre M., Bujdoso N., Bale J., Wang H., Davis S.J., Verstrepen K.J., Queitsch C. Background-dependent effects of polyglutamine variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana gene ELF3. PNAS 2012, 109:19363-19367.
50. Nusinow D.A., Helfer A., Hamilton E.E., King J.J., Imaizumi T., Schultz T.F., Farre E.M., Kay S.A. The ELF4-ELF3-LUX complex links the circadian clock to diurnal control of hypocotyl growth. Nature 2011, 475:398-402.
51. Sgrò C.M., Wegener B., Hoffmann A.A. A naturally occurring variant of Hsp90 that is associated with decanalization. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 2010, 277:2049-2057.
52. Chen B., Wagner A. Hsp90 is important for fecundity, longevity, and buffering of cryptic deleterious variation in wild fly populations. BMC Evol Biol 2012, 12:25.
53. Boone C., Bussey H., Andrews B.J. Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast. Nat Rev Genet 2007, 8:437-449.
54. Davierwala A.P., Haynes J., Li Z., Brost R.L., Robinson M.D., Yu L., Mnaimneh S., Ding H., Zhu H., Chen Y., et al. The synthetic genetic interaction spectrum of essential genes. Nat Genet 2005, 37:1147-1152.
55. Giaever G., Chu A.M., Ni L., Connelly C., Riles L., Veronneau S., Dow S., Lucau-Danila A., Anderson K., Andre B., et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 2002, 418:387-391.
56. Shen X., Pettersson M., Rönnegård L., Carlborg Ö. Inheritance beyond plain heritability: variance-controlling genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 2012, 8:e1002839.
57. Lloyd J., Meinke D. A comprehensive dataset of genes with a loss-of-function mutant phenotype in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 2012.
58. Hollick J.B. Paramutation and development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2010, 26:557-579.
59. Parkinson S.E., Gross S.M., Hollick J.B. Maize sex determination and abaxial leaf fates are canalized by a factor that maintains repressed epigenetic states. Dev Biol 2007, 308:462-473.
60. Boulon S., Westman B.J., Hutten S., Boisvert F.M., Lamond A.I. The nucleolus under stress. Mol Cell 2010, 40:216-227.
61. Freed E.F., Bleichert F., Dutca L.M., Baserga S.J. When ribosomes go bad: diseases of ribosome biogenesis. Mol Biosyst 2010, 6:481-493.
62. Degenhardt R.F., Bonham-Smith P.C. Arabidopsis ribosomal proteins RPL23aA and RPL23aB are differentially targeted to the nucleolus and are disparately required for normal development. Plant Physiol 2008, 147:128-142.
63. Jackson S., Chen Z.J. Genomic and expression plasticity of polyploidy. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2010, 13:153-159.
64. Leitch A.R., Leitch I.J. Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 2008, 320:481-483.
65. Ha M., Lu J., Tian L., Ramachandran V., Kasschau K.D., Chapman E.J., Carrington J.C., Chen X., Wang X.-J., Chen Z.J. Small RNAs serve as a genetic buffer against genomic shock in Arabidopsis interspecific hybrids and allopolyploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:17835-17840.
66. Luo J., Hall B.D. A multistep process gave rise to RNA polymerase IV of land plants. J Mol Evol 2007, 64:101-112.
67. Vazquez F., Vaucheret H., Rajagopalan R., Lepers C., Gasciolli V., Mallory A.C., Hilbert J.-L., Bartel D.P., Crété P. Endogenous trans-acting siRNAs regulate the accumulation of Arabidopsis mRNAs. Mol Cell 2004, 16:69-79.