Usage-Based Language: Investigating the Latent Structures That Underpin Acquisition

Language Learning

Volumn 63, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2013, Pages 25-51

  Ellis, Nick C ^a   O'Donnell, Matthew Brook ^a   Römer, Ute ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex systems; Corpus linguistics; Emergentism; Learning theory; Usage based acquisition; Zipfian distribution

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873722272     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00736.x     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches . Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
2. Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications (5th ed.). New York : W.H. Freeman.
3. Baayen, R. H. (2009). Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In A. Ludeling & M. Kyto (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 900-919). Berlin : Mouton De Gruyter.
4. Bannard, C., & Lieven, E. (2009). Repetition and reuse in child language learning. In R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, & K. M. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic language: Volume 2: Acquisition, loss, psychological reality, and functional explanations (pp. 299-321). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
5. Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks . Cambridge, MA : Perseus Books.
6. Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., et al. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system. Position paper. Language Learning, 59 (Supplement 1), 1-26.
7. British National Corpus. (2007). BNC XML Edition. Retrieved at http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/corpus/
8. Boyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E. (2009). Input effects within a constructionist framework. Modern Language Journal, 93, 418-429.
9. Briscoe, E., Carroll, J., & Watson, R. (2006). The second release of the RASP system . Paper presented at the Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Interactive Presentation Sessions, Sydney, Australia .
10. Buttery, P., & Korhonen, A. (2005). Large scale analysis of verb subcategorization differences between child directed speech and adult speech . Paper presented at the Interdisciplinary Workshop on the Identification and Representation of Verb Features and Verb Classes. Saarbrücken, Germany .
11. Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216-236). London : Routledge.
12. Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage, and cognition . Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
13. Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure . Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
14. Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. E. (2005). Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8, 500-508.
15. Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 31, 489-509.
16. Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (Eds.). (2001). Connectionist psycholinguistics . Westport, CT : Ablex.
17. Clark, E. V. (1978). Discovering what words can do. In D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen, & K. W. Todrys (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on the lexicon, Chicago Linguistics Society April 14-15, 1978 (pp. 34-57). Chicago : Chicago Linguistics Society.
18. Clauset, A., Newman, M. E. J., & Moore, C. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E, 70, 066111.
19. Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
20. Croft, W. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and causal structure . Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
21. Danon, L., Díaz-Guilera, A., Duch, J., & Arenas, A. (2005). Comparing community structure identification methods. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 29, P09008.
22. de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2010). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek . Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
23. Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain . New York : W.W. Norton.
24. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. R. C. E. B. [1913], Trans.). New York : Teachers College, Columbia University.
25. Ellis, N. C. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48, 631-664.
26. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
27. Ellis, N. C. (2006a). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1-24.
28. Ellis, N. C. (2006b). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 1-31.
29. Ellis, N. C. (2008a). Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in usage-based and form-focussed learning. In M. H. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language teaching (pp. 139-158). Oxford, UK : Blackwell.
30. Ellis, N. C. (2008b). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372-405). London : Routledge.
31. Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7 (Special section), 111-290.
32. Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009a). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93, 370-386.
33. Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009b). Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 111-139.
34. Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics [Special Issue]. Applied Linguistics, 27(4).
35. Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009a). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59(Supplement 1), 93-128.
36. Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009b). Language as a complex adaptive system [Special Issue]. Language Learning, 59(Supplement 1).
37. Ellis, N. C., & O'Donnell, M. B. (2011). Robust language acquisition: An emergent consequence of language as a complex adaptive system. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3512-3517). Austin, TX : Cognitive Science Society.
38. Ellis, N. C., & O'Donnell, M. B. (2012). Statistical construction learning: Does a Zipfian problem space ensure robust language learning? In J. Rebuschat & J. Williams (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 265-304). Berlin, Germany : Mouton de Gruyter.
39. Ellis, N. C., O'Donnell, M. B. & Römer, U. (2012). The psychological reality of verb-argument constructions: Representing form, function, frequency contingency, and prototypicality . Manuscript in preparation.
40. Evert, S. (2005). The statistics of word cooccurrences: Word pairs and collocations . Stuttgart, Germany : University of Stuttgart.
41. Ferrer i Cancho, R., & Solé, R. V. (2001). The small world of human language. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B., 268, 2261-2265.
42. Ferrer i Cancho, R., & Solé, R. V. (2003). Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 788-791.
43. Ferrer i Cancho, R., Solé, R. V., & Köhler, R. (2004). Patterns in syntactic dependency networks. Physical Review, E69, 0519151-0519158.
44. Francis, G., Hunston, S., & Manning, E. (Eds.). (1996). Grammar patterns 1: Verbs. The COBUILD series . London : HarperCollins.
45. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure . Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
46. Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language . Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
47. Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289-316.
48. Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S. (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182-200.
49. Harnad, S. (Ed.). (1987). Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition . New York : Cambridge University Press.
50. Hawking, S. (2000, January 23). "Unified Theory" is getting closer, Hawking predicts. Interview in San Jose Mercury News, 29A.
51. Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (1996). Pattern grammar: A corpus driven approach to the lexical grammar of English . Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
52. Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2009). Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
53. Kello, C. T., Brown, G. D. A., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Holden, J. G., Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Rhodes, T., et al. (2010). Scaling laws in cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 223-232.
54. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind . Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
55. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites . Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
56. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 141-165.
57. Leech, L. (2000). Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning, 50, 675-724.
58. Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary analysis . Chicago : Chicago University Press.
59. Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children's first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 168-196). New York, London : Routledge.
60. MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249-308). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
61. MacWhinney, B. (Ed.). (1999). The emergence of language . Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
62. MacWhinney, B. (2000a). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk, Vol. 1: Transcription format and programs (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. MacWhinney, B. (2000b). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk, Vol. 2: The database (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
64. MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69-90). New York : Cambridge University Press.
65. Manin, D. Y. (2008). Zipf's Law and avoidance of excessive synonymy. Cognitive Science, 32, 1075-1098.
66. Miller, G. A. (2009). WordNet: About us . Retrieved March 1, 2010, from http://wordnet.princeton.edu
67. Newman, M. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Physics, 46, 323-351.
68. Ninio, A. (1999). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26, 619-653.
69. Ninio, A. (2006). Language and the learning curve: A new theory of syntactic development . Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
70. Ninio, A. (2011). Syntactic development, its input and output . Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
71. O'Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C. (2009). Measuring formulaic language in corpora from the perspective of language as a complex system . Paper presented at the 5th Corpus Linguistics Conference, University of Liverpool, July 20-23.
72. O'Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). Towards an inventory of English verb argument constructions. Proceedings of the 11th annual conference of the north american chapter of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 9-16), Los Angeles, CA .
73. O'Donnell, M. B., Ellis, N. C., & Corden, G. (2012). Exploring semantics in verb argument constructions using community identification algorithms . Paper presented at the Language & Network Science symposium, The International Conference on Network Science NETSCI 2012, Northwestern University.
74. Page, S. E. (Writer). (2009). Understanding complexity[DVD-ROM]. Chantilly, VA : The Teaching Company.
75. Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., & Michelizzi, J. (2004). WordNet: Similarity-Measuring the relatedness of concepts. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics (NAACL 2004), San Jose, CA .
76. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure . Cambridge, MA : Bradford Books.
77. Rescorla, R. A. (1968). Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66, 1-5.
78. Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). A handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition . London : Routledge.
79. Römer, U., O'Donnell, M., & Ellis, N. C. (in press). Using COBUILD grammar patterns for a large-scale analysis of verb-argument constructions: Exploring corpus data and speaker knowledge. In M. Charles, N. Groom, & S. John (Eds.), Corpora, grammar, text and discourse: In honour of Susan Hunston . Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
80. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-233.
81. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
82. Saussure, F. D. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale [Course in general linguistics] (Roy Harris, Trans.). London : Duckworth.
83. Shanks, D. R. (1995). The psychology of associative learning . New York : Cambridge University Press.
84. Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse . London : Routledge.
85. Sinclair, J. (Ed.). (1987). Looking up: An account of the COBUILD project in lexical computing . London : Collins ELT.
86. Solé, R. V., Murtra, B., Valverde, S., & Steels, L. (2010). Language networks: Their structure, function and evolution. Complexity, 15(6), 20-26.
87. Steyvers, M., & Tennenbaum, J. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41-78.
88. Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring systems . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
89. Taylor, J. R. (1998). Syntactic constructions as prototype categories. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 177-202). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
90. Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive grammar . Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
91. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language . Boston : Harvard University Press.
92. Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos . New York : Simon & Schuster.
93. Whitman, W. (1904 [1855]). Leaves of grass . Boston : Small, Maynard & Company.
94. William of, Ockham (1495). Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi (ed. Lugd., 1495), i, dist. 27, qu. 2, K.
95. Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.