Determining the calibration of confidence estimation procedures for unique peptides in shotgun proteomics

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 80, Issue , 2013, Pages 123-131

  Granholm, Viktor ^a   Navarro, José Fernández ^b   Noble, William Stafford ^c   Käll, Lukas ^b  

^a SCIENCE FOR LIFE LABORATORY   (Sweden)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Peptides; Shotgun proteomics; Statistics

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; DATA BASE; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; SHOTGUN PROTEOMICS; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; PROBABILITY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PEPTIDES; PROBABILITY; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84873695876     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aebersold R., Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003, 422:198-207.
2. Käll L., Vitek O. Computational mass spectrometry-based proteomics. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7:e1002277.
3. Noble W., MacCoss M. Computational and statistical analysis of protein mass spectrometry data. PLoS Comput Biol 2012, 8:e1002296.
4. Granholm V., Käll L. Quality assessments of peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics. Proteomics 2011, 11:1086-1093.
5. Sorić B. Statistical "discoveries" and effect-size estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 1989, 84:608-610.
6. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 1995, 57:289-300.
7. Storey J., Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:9440.
8. Moore R., Young M., Lee T. Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2002, 13:378-386.
9. Elias J., Gygi S. Target-decoy search strategy for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Methods Mol Biol 2010, 604:55.
10. Fenyö D., Beavis R. A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes. Anal Chem 2003, 75:768-774.
11. Klammer A., Park C., Noble W. Statistical calibration of the SEQUEST XCorr function. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:2106-2113.
12. Keller A., Nesvizhskii A., Kolker E., Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem 2002, 74:5383-5392.
13. Kim S., Gupta N., Pevzner P. Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:3354-3363.
14. Schulz-Knappe P., Hans-Dieter Z., Heine G., Jurgens M., Schrader M. Peptidomics the comprehensive analysis of peptides in complex biological mixtures. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2001, 4:207-217.
15. Nesvizhskii A., Keller A., Kolker E., Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2003, 75:4646-4658.
16. Cox J., Mann M. Maxquant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized ppb-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:1367-1372.
17. Serang O., MacCoss M., Noble W. Efficient marginalization to compute protein posterior probabilities from shotgun mass spectrometry data. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:5346-5357.
18. Reiter L., Claassen M., Schrimpf S., Jovanovic M., Schmidt A., Buhmann J., et al. Protein identification false discovery rates for very large proteomics data sets generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:2405.
19. Bern M., Kil Y. Two-dimensional target decoy strategy for shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:5296-5301.
20. Weatherly D., Atwood J., Minning T., Cavola C., Tarleton R., Orlando R. A heuristic method for assigning a false-discovery rate for protein identifications from mascot database search results. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:762.
21. Käll L., Canterbury J., Weston J., Noble W., MacCoss M. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat Methods 2007, 4:923-925.
22. Bern M., Goldberg D. Improved ranking functions for protein and modification-site identifications. J Comput Biol 2008, 15:705-719.
23. Shteynberg D., Deutsch E., Lam H., Eng J., Sun Z., Tasman N., et al. iProphet: multi-level integrative analysis of shotgun proteomic data improves peptide and protein identification rates and error estimates. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011, 10.
24. Nesvizhskii A. A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics. J Proteomics 2010, 73:2092-2123.
25. Granholm V., Noble W., Käll L. On using samples of known protein content to assess the statistical calibration of scores assigned to peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:2671-2678.
26. Käll L., Storey J., MacCoss M., Noble W. Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:29-34.
27. Davison A.C., Hinkley D.V. Bootstrap methods and their application 1997, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
28. Efron B., Tibshirani R., Storey J., Tusher V. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. J Am Stat Assoc 2001, 96:1151-1160.
29. Storey J. A direct approach to false discovery rates. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 2002, 64:479-498.
30. Klimek J., Eddes J., Hohmann L., Jackson J., Peterson A., Letarte S., et al. The standard protein mix database: a diverse data set to assist in the production of improved peptide and protein identification software tools. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:96-103.
31. Zhang B., Chambers M., Tabb D. Proteomic parsimony through bipartite graph analysis improves accuracy and transparency. J Proteome Res 2007, 6:3549-3557.
32. Keller A., Purvine S., Nesvizhskii A., Stolyar S., Goodlett D., Kolker E. Experimental protein mixture for validating tandem mass spectral analysis. OMICS 2002, 6:207-212.
33. Park C., Klammer A., Käll L., MacCoss M., Noble W. Rapid and accurate peptide identification from tandem mass spectra. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:3022-3027.
34. Eng J., McCormack A., Yates J. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 1994, 5:976-989.
35. Liu H., Sadygov R., Yates J. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 2004, 76:4193-4201.
36. Colinge J., Chiappe D., Lagache S., Moniatte M., Bougueleret L. Differential proteomics via probabilistic peptide identification scores. Anal Chem 2005, 77:596-606.
37. Käll L., Storey J., Noble W. Qvality: non-parametric estimation of q-values and posterior error probabilities. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:964-966.