Bacterial cellulose scaffolds and cellulose nanowhiskers for tissue engineering

Nanomedicine

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 287-298

  Dugan, James M ^a   Gough, Julie E ^a   Eichhorn, Stephen J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

bacterial cellulose; bone; cartilage; cellulose; cellulose nanocrystal; cellulose nanowhisker; microbial cellulose; tissue engineering; vascular

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; CELLOBIOSE; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE NANOWHISKER; HYDROXYAPATITE; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; NANOCRYSTAL; NANOMATERIAL; POLYSACCHARIDE; SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; COLLOID; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; UROCHORDATA;

EID: 84873603219     PISSN: 17435889     EISSN: 17486963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.12.211     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Payen A. Mémoire sur la composition du tissu propre des plantes et du ligneux. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 7, 1052 (1838).
2. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 44(22), 3358-3393 (2005).
3. Wertz J-L, Bédué O, Mercier JP. Cellulose Science and Technology. EPFL Press, Lausanne, Switzerland (2010).
4. Cross C, Bevan E, Beadle C. Thiokohlensaueester der cellulose. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 26, 1090-1097 (1893).
5. Miyamoto T, Takahashi S, Ito H, Inagaki H, Noishiki Y. Tissue biocompatibility of cellulose and its derivatives. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 23(1), 125-133 (1989).
6. Märtson M, Viljanto J, Hurme T, Laippala P, Saukko P. Is cellulose sponge degradable or stable as implantation material? An in vivo subcutaneous study in the rat. Biomaterials 20(21), 1989-1995 (1999).
7. Yokota S, Kitaoka T, Wariishi H. Biofunctionality of self-assembled nanolayers composed of cellulosic polymers. Carbohydr. Polym. 74(3), 666-672 (2008).
8. Nel AE, Madler L, Velegol D et al. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Mater. 8(7), 543-557 (2009).
9. Langer R, Tirrell DA. Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature 428(6982), 487-492 (2004).
10. Mitragotri S, Lahann J. Physical approaches to biomaterial design. Nat. Mater. 8(1), 15-23 (2009).
11. Wang YX, Robertson JL, Spillman WB, Claus RO. Effects of the chemical structure and the surface properties of polymeric biomaterials on their biocompatibility. Pharm. Res. 21(8), 1362-1373 (2004).
12. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126(4), 677-689 (2006).
13. Faucheux N, Schweiss R, Lutzow K, Werner C, Groth T. Self-assembled monolayers with different terminating groups as model substrates for cell adhesion studies. Biomaterials 25(14), 2721-2730 (2004).
14. Biggs MJP, Richards RG, Dalby MJ. Nanotopographical modification: A regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions. Nanomedicine 6(5), 619-633 (2010).
15. Anselme K, Bigerelle M. Role of materials surface topography on mammalian cell response. Int. Mater. Rev. 56(4), 243-266 (2011).
16. Place ES, Evans ND, Stevens MM. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat. Mater. 8(6), 457-470 (2009).
17. Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21(24), 2529-2543 (2000).
18. Cen L, Liu W, Cui L, Zhang WJ, Cao YL. Collagen tissue engineering: development of novel biomaterials and applications. Pediatr. Res. 63(5), 492-496 (2008).
19. Wittmer CR, Phelps JA, Lepus CM, Saltzman WM, Harding MJ, Van Tassel PR. Multilayer nanofilms as substrates for hepatocellular applications. Biomaterials 29(30), 4082-4090 (2008).
20. Chen JP, Chang YS. Preparation and characterization of composite nanofibers of polycaprolactone and nanohydroxyapatite for osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 86(1), 169-175 (2011).
21. Baiguera S, Gonfiotti A, Jaus M et al. Development of bioengineered human larynx. Biomaterials 32(19), 4433-4442 (2011).
22. Chen P, Cho SY, Jin HJ. Modification and applications of bacterial celluloses in polymer science. Macromol. Res. 18(4), 309-320 (2010).
23. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S et al. Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50(24), 5438-5466 (2011).
24. Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8(1), 1-12 (2007).
25. Klemm D, Schumann D, Kramer F et al. Nanocelluloses as innovative polymers in research and application. In: Polysaccharides II. Klemm D (Ed.). Springer, NY, USA, 49-96 (2006).
26. Petersen N, Gatenholm P. Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91(5), 1277-1286 (2011).
27. Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, Marsch S. Bacterial synthesized cellulose-artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog. Polym. Sci. 26(9), 1561-1603 (2001).
28. Backdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A et al. Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27(9), 2141-2149 (2006).
29. Zahedmanesh H, Mackle JN, Sellborn A et al. Bacterial cellulose as a potential vascular graft: mechanical characterization and constitutive model development. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 97(1), 105-113 (2011).
30. Wippermann J, Schumann D, Klemm D, Kosmehl H, Satehi-Gelani S, Wahlers T. Preliminary results of small arterial substitute performed with a new cylindrical biomaterial composed of bacterial cellulose. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 37(5), 592-596 (2009).
31. Clark WR, Hamburger RJ, Lysaght MJ. Effect of membrane composition and structure on solute removal and biocompatibility in hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 56(6), 2005-2015 (1999).
32. Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Backdahl H, Popp J, Goldstein A, Gatenholm P. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 6(7), 2540-2547 (2010).
33. Andersson J, Stenhamre H, Backdahl H, Gatenholm P. Behavior of human chondrocytes in engineered porous bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 94(4), 1124-1132 (2010).
34. Fang B, Wan YZ, Tang TT, Gao C, Dai KR. Proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells on hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part A 15(5), 1091-1098 (2009).
35. Shi Q, Li Y, Sun J et al. The osteogenesis of bacterial cellulose scaffold loaded with bone morphogenetic protein 2. Biomaterials 33(28), 6644-6649 (2012).
36. Wang J, Wan YZ, Luo HL, Gao C, Huang Y. Immobilization of gelatin on bacterial cellulose nanofibers surface via crosslinking technique. Mater. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. Biol. Appl. 32(3), 536-541 (2012).
37. Pertile R, Moreira S, Andrade F, Domingues L, Gama M. Bacterial cellulose modified using recombinant proteins to improve neuronal and mesenchymal cell adhesion. Biotech. Prog. 28(2), 526-532 (2012).
38. Bodin A, Ahrenstedt L, Fink H, Brumer H, Risberg B, Gatenholm P. Modification of nanocellulose with a xyloglucan-RGD conjugate enhances adhesion and proliferation of endothelial cells: implications for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 8(12), 3697-3704 (2007).
39. Bodin A, Bharadwaj S, Wu S, Gatenholm P, Atala A, Zhang Y. Tissue-engineered conduit using urine-derived stem cells seeded bacterial cellulose polymer in urinary reconstruction and diversion. Biomaterials 31(34), 8889-8901 (2010).
40. Helenius G, Backdahl H, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Gatenholm P, Risberg B. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 76(2), 431-438 (2006).
41. Esguerra M, Fink H, Laschke MW et al. Intravital fluorescent microscopic evaluation of bacterial cellulose as scaffold for vascular grafts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 93(1), 140-149 (2009).
42. Battista OA. Hydrolysis and crystallization of cellulose. Ind. Eng. Chem. 42(3), 502-507 (1950).
43. Nickerson RF, Habrle JA. Cellulose intercrystalline structure-study by hydrolytic methods. Ind. Eng. Chem. 39(11), 1507-1512 (1947).
44. Ranby BG. Aqueous colloidal solutions of cellulose micelles. Acta Chem. Scand. 3(5), 649-650 (1949).
45. Marchessault RH, Morehead FF, Walter NM. Liquid crystal systems from fibrillar polysaccharides. Nature 184(4686), 632-633 (1959).
46. Revol JF, Bradford H, Giasson J, Marchessault RH, Gray DG. Helicoidal self-ordering of cellulose microfibrils in aqueous suspension. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 14(3), 170-172 (1992).
47. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M et al. Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 45(1), 1-33 (2010).
48. Cranston ED, Gray DG. Birefringence in spin-coated films containing cellulose nanocrystals. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 325(1-2), 44-51 (2008).
49. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ. Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem. Rev. 110(6), 3479-3500 (2010).
50. Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T. Flow properties of microcrystalline cellulose suspension prepared by acid treatment of native cellulose. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 142(1), 75-82 (1998).
51. Dong XM, Revol JF, Gray DG. Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose 5(1), 19-32 (1998).
52. Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG. Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules 6(2), 1048-1054 (2005).
53. Elazzouzi-Hafraoui S, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Heux L, Dubreuil F, Rochas C. The shape and size distribution of crystalline nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 9(1), 57-65 (2008).
54. Angles MN, Dufresne A. Plasticized starch/ tunicin whiskers nanocomposites. 1. Structural analysis. Macromolecules 33(22), 8344-8353 (2000).
55. Roman M, Dong SP, Hirani A, Lee YW. Cellulose nanocrystals for drug delivery. In: Polysaccharide Materials: Performance by Design. Edgar KJ, Heinze T, Buchanan CM (Eds). ACS Publications, WA, USA, 81-91(2009).
56. Mahmoud KA, Mena JA, Male KB, Hrapovic S, Kamen A, Luong JHT. Effect of surface charge on the cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of fluorescent labeled cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2(10), 2924-2932 (2010).
57. Clift MJD, Foster EJ, Vanhecke D et al. Investigating the interaction of cellulose nanofibers derived from cotton with a sophisticated 3D human lung cell coculture. Biomacromolecules 12(10), 3666-3673 (2011).
58. Dugan JM, Gough JE, Eichhorn SJ. Directing the morphology and differentiation of skeletal muscle cells using oriented cellulose nanowhiskers. Biomacromolecules 11(9), 2498-2504 (2010).
59. Dugan JM, Collins RF, Gough JE, Eichhorn SJ. Oriented surfaces of adsorbed cellulose nanowhiskers promote skeletal muscle myogenesis. Acta Biomater. 9(1), 4707-4715 (2013).