The Nesting of Search Contexts Within Natural Scenes: Evidence From Contextual Cuing

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1406-1418

  Brooks, Daniel I ^a   Rasmussen, Ian P ^a   Hollingworth, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Contextual cuing; Scene perception; Spatial memory; Visual memory; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COLOR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650080973     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019257     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Becker M.W., Rasmussen I.P. Guidance of attention to objects and locations by long-term memory of natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:1325-1338.
2. Bostock E., Muller R.U., Kubie J.L. Experience-dependent modifications of hippocampal place cell firing. Hippocampus 1991, 193-205.
3. Brady T.F., Chun M.M. Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:798-815.
4. Brockmole J.R., Castelhano M.S., Henderson J.M. Contextual cuing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:699-706.
5. Brockmole J.R., Henderson J.M. Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:1177-1187.
6. Brockmole J.R., Henderson J.M. Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition 2006, 13:99-108.
7. Castelhano M.S., Henderson J.M. Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:753-763.
8. Chen X., Zelinsky G.J. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance. Vision Research 2006, 46:4118-4133.
9. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 36:28-71.
10. Chun M.M., Jiang Y.H. Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:224-234.
11. Chun M.M., Phelps E.A. Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic patients with hippocampal damage. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:844-847.
12. Chun M.M., Turk-Browne N.B. Associative learning mechanisms in vision. Visual memory 2008, 209-246. Oxford University Press, New York. S.J. Luck, A. Hollingworth (Eds.).
13. Davidian M., Giltinian D.M. Nonlinear models for repeated measurement data: An overview and update. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 2003, 4:387-419.
14. Eckstein M.P., Drescher B.A., Shimozaki S.S. Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science 2006, 17:973-980.
15. Henderson J.M., Brockmole J.R., Castelhano M.S., Mack M. Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during search in real-world scenes. Eye movements: A window on mind and brain 2007, 537-562. Elsevier, Oxford, England. R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, R. Hill (Eds.).
16. Henderson J.M., Weeks P.A., Hollingworth A. The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:210-228.
17. Hirtle S.C., Jonides J. Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory & Cognition 1985, 13:208-217.
18. Hollingworth A. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:58-69.
19. Hollingworth A. Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:31-47.
20. Hollingworth A. Two forms of scene memory guide visual search: Memory for scene context and memory for the binding of target object to scene location. Visual Cognition 2009, 17:273-291.
21. Itti L., Koch C. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research 2000, 40:1489-1506.
22. Jiang Y.H., Wagner L.C. What is learned in spatial contextual cuing-Configuration or individual locations?. Perception & Psychophysics 2004, 66:454-463.
23. Land M.F., Hayhoe M. In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?. Vision Research 2001, 41:3559-3565.
24. Macuda T., Roberts W.A. Further evidence for hierarchical chunking in rat spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1995, 21:20-32.
25. McNamara T.P. Mental representations of spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology 1986, 18:87-121.
26. McNamara T.P., Hardy J.K., Hirtle S.C. Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15:211-227.
27. Morris R.G.M., Garrud P., Rawlins J.N.P., O'Keefe J. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 1982, June 24, 297:681-683.
28. Neider M.B., Zelinsky G.J. Scene context guides eye movements during visual search. Vision Research 2006, 46:614-621.
29. Neider M.B., Zelinsky G.J. Exploring set size effects in scenes: Identifying the objects of search. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:1-10.
30. O'Keefe J., Speakman A. Single unit activity in the rat hippocampus during a spatial memory task. Experimental Brain Research 1987, 68:1-27.
31. Olson I.R., Chun M.M. Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition 2002, 9:273-302.
32. Parkhurst D., Law K., Niebur E. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research 2002, 42:107-123.
33. Pauler D., Finkelstein D.M. Predicting time to prostate cancer recurrence based on joint models for non-linear longitudinal biomarkers and event time outcomes. Statistics in Medicine 2002, 21:3897-3911.
34. Pinheiro J.C., Bates D.M. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS 2000, Springer-Verlag, New York.
35. Pomplun M. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays. Vision Research 2006, 46:1886-1900.
36. Taylor H.A., Tversky B. Descriptions and depictions of environments. Memory & Cognition 1992, 20:483-496.
37. Torralba A., Oliva A., Castelhano M.S., Henderson J.M. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review 2006, 113:766-786.
38. Wu H., Ding A.A. Population HIV-1 dynamics in vivo: Applicable models and inferential tools for virological data from AIDS clinical trials. Biometrics 1998, 55:410-418.
39. Yarbus A.L. Eye movements and vision 1967, Plenum Press, New York.
40. Young M.E., Clark M.H., Goffus A., Hoane M.R. Mixed effects modeling of Morris water maze data: Advantages and cautionary notes. Learning and Motivation 2009, 40:160-177.