Finding a new target in an old display: Evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 846-851

  Körner, Christof ^a   Gilchrist, Iain D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37349070168     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194110     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ATKINSON, R. C., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. Spence & J. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning andmotivation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
2. BECK, M. R., PETERSON, M. S., BOOT, W. R., VOMELA, M., & KRAMER, A. F. (2006). Explicit memory for rejected distractors during visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 150-174.
3. BECK, M. R., PETERSON, M. S., & VOMELA, M. (2006). Memory for where, but not what, is used during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 235-250.
4. BOOT, W. R., MCCARLEY, J. M., KRAMER, A. F., & PETERSON, M. S. (2004). Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 854-861.
5. BOUMA, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178.
6. COWAN, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87-114.
7. GILCHRIST, I. D., & HARVEY, M. (2000). Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology, 10, 1209-1212.
8. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575-577.
9. KLEIN, R. M., & MCINNES. W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
10. KÖRNER, C., & GILCHRIST, I. D. (in press). Memory processes in multiple-target visual search. Psychological Research.
11. KRISTJANSSON, A. (2000). In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science, 11, 328-332.
12. MCCARLEY, J. S., WANG, R. F., KRAMER, A. F., IRWIN, D. E., & PETERSON, M. S. (2003). How much memory does occulomotor search have? Psychological Science, 14, 422-426.
13. MCCRARY, J., & HUNTER, W. S. (1953). Serial position curves in verbal learning. Science, 117, 131-137.
14. PETERSON, M. S., KRAMER, A. F., WANG, R. F., IRWIN, D. E., & MCCARLEY, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12, 287-292.
15. SHORE, D. I., & KLEIN, R. M. (2000). On the manifestations of memory in visual search. Spatial Vision, 14, 59-75.
16. WOLFE, J. M., KLEMPEN, N., & DAHLEN, K. (2000). Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 693-716.
17. WOLFE, J. M., OLIVA, A., BUTCHER, S. J., & ARSENIO, H. C. (2002). An unbinding problem? The disintegration of visible, previously attended objects does not attract attention. Journal of Vision, 2, 256-271.
18. ZELINSKY, G. J., & LOSCHKY, L. C. (2005). Eye movements serialize memory for objects in scenes. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 676-690.