Embodying the Mind and Representing the Body

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-13

  Alsmith, Adrian John Tetteh ^a   de Vignemont, Frédérique ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873254100     PISSN: 18785158     EISSN: 18785166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13164-012-0085-4     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Adams, F., and K. Aizawa. 2001. The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology 14(1): 43-64.
2. Adams, F., and K. Aizawa. 2008. The bounds of cognition. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
3. Arzy, S., G. Thut, C. Mohr, C. M. Michel, and O. Blanke. 2006. Neural basis of embodiment: Distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area. The Journal of Neuroscience 26(31): 8074-8081. doi: 10. 1523/jneurosci. 0745-06. 2006.
4. Ballard, D. H., M. M. Hayhoe, P. K. Pook, and R. P. Rao. 1997. Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20(4): 723-742.
5. Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577-609.
6. Bayne, T. 2010. Agentive experiences as pushmi-pullyu representations. In J. Aguilar, A. Buckareff and K. Frankish (eds.) New Waves in the Philosophy of Action. Palgrave Macmillan, 219-36.
7. Beer, R. D. 2009. Beyond control: The dynamics of brain-body-environment interaction in motor systems. In Progress in motor control, vol. 629, ed. D. Sternad, 7-24. US: Springer.
8. Block, N. 2007. Review of Alva Noë, Action in perception. In Consciousness, function, and representation: Collected papers, vol. 1, ed. N. Block, 363-375. Cambridge: MIT.
9. Brooks, R. A. 1991. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47(1-3): 139-159. doi: 10. 1016/0004-3702(91)90053-m.
10. Chatterjee, A. 2010. Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition 2(1): 79-116. doi: 10. 1515/langcog. 2010. 004.
11. Chemero, T. 2009. Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT.
12. Churchland, P. S., V. S. Ramachandran, and T. S. Sejnowski. 1994. A critique of pure vision. In Large/scale neuronal theories of the brain, ed. C. Koch and J. Davis, 231-244. Cambridge: MIT.
13. Clark, A. 1989. Microcognition: Philosophy, cognitive science, and parallel distributed processing. Cambridge: MIT.
14. Clark, A. 1997. Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: MIT.
15. Clark, A. 2008a. Embodiment and explanation. In Handbook of cognitive science. An embodied approach, ed. P. Calvo and A. Gomila, 41-58. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
16. Clark, A. 2008b. Pressing the flesh: A tension in the study of the embodied, embedded mind? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76(1): 37-59. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1933-1592. 2007. 00114. x.
17. Clark, A. 2008c. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Clark, A. 2009. Spreading the joy? why the machinery of consciousness is (probably) still in the head. Mind 118: 963-993.
19. Clark, A., and D. Chalmers. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58: 10-23.
20. Clark, A., and R. Grush. 1999. Towards a cognitive robotics. Adaptive Behavior 7(1): 5-16.
21. Cussins, A. 1990. The connectionist construction of concepts. In The philosophy of artificial intelligence, ed. M. A. Boden, 368-440. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Davidson, P. R., and D. M. Wolpert. 2005. Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: A short review. Journal of Neural Engineering 2: S313-S319.
23. de Vignemont, F. 2010. Body schema and body image-pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 48: 669-680.
24. Dempsey, L. & Shani, I. (forthcoming). Stressing the flesh: In defence of strong embodied cognition. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
25. Dennett, D. C. 1996. Kinds of minds. New York: Basic Books.
26. Desmurget, M., and S. Grafton. 2000. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(11): 423-431.
27. Eliasmith, C. 2008. Dynamics, control and cognition. In Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, ed. P. Robbins and M. Aydede, 134-154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Evans, G. 1982. The varieties of reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Gallagher, S. 2005a. Dynamic models of body schematic processes. In Body image and body schema: Interdisciplinary perspectives on the body, ed. H. De Preester and V. Knockaert, 233-250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30. Gallagher, S. 2005b. How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Gallagher, S. 2008. Are minimal representations still representations? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16(3): 351-369.
32. Gallese, V., and G. Lakoff. 2005. The Brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22(3-4): 455-479. doi: 10. 1080/02643290442000310.
33. Gallese, V., and C. Sinigaglia. 2010. The bodily self as power for action. Neuropsychologia 48(3): 746-755.
34. Gallese, V., and C. Sinigaglia. 2011. What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(11): 512-519.
35. Glenberg, A. 1997. What memory is for. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20(1): 1-19.
36. Glenberg, A. 2010. Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1(4): 586-596. doi: 10. 1002/wcs. 55.
37. Goldin-Meadow, S. 1999. The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(11): 419-429.
38. Goldman, A., and F. de Vignemont. 2009. Is social cognition embodied? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(4): 154-159.
39. Grush, R. 1998. Skill and spatial content. Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy 6.
40. Grush, R. 2003. In defense of some 'Cartesian' assumptions concerning the brain and its operation. Biology and Philosophy 18: 53-93.
41. Grush, R. 2004. The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 377-396.
42. Hesslow, G. 2002. Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(6): 242-247. doi: 10. 1016/s1364-6613(02)01913-7.
43. Humberstone, I. L., 1992. Direction of fit. Mind, 101(401): 59-83.
44. Hurley, S. L. 2010. Varieties of externalism. In The extended mind, ed. R. Menary, 101-154. Cambridge: MIT.
45. Jacob, P. (this volume) Embodying the mind by extending it.
46. Jacob, P., and M. Jeannerod. 2003. Ways of seeing: The scope and limits of visual cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Jeannerod, M. 1997. The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford: Blackwell.
48. Jeannerod, M. 2006. Motor cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Kelso, J. A. S. 1995. Dynamic patterns: The self-organisation of brain and behaviour. Cambridge: MIT.
50. Kelso, J. A. S. 2002. The complementary nature of coordination dynamics: Self-organization and agency. Nonlinear Phenomena in Complex Systems 4: 364-371.
51. Kinsbourne, M. 1995. Awareness of one's own body: An attentional theory of its nature, development, and brain basis. In The body and the self, ed. J. L. Bermúdez, A. Marcel, and N. Eilan, 205-223. Cambridge: MIT.
52. Kinsbourne, M. 2002. The brain and body awareness. In Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice, ed. T. F. Cash and T. Pruzinsky, 22-39. New York: Guildford.
53. Kosslyn, S. M., N. M. Alpert, W. L. Thompson, V. Maljkovic, S. B. Weise, C. F. Chabris, and F. S. Buonanno. 1993. Visual mental imagery activates topographically-organized visual cortex: PET investigations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 263-287.
54. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
55. Latash, M. 2008. Neurophysiological basis of movement. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
56. Mahon, B., and A. Caramazza. 2005. The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: Clues from neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22: 480-494.
57. Mandik, P. 2005. Action-oriented representation. In Cognition and the brain: The philosophy and neuroscience movement, ed. A. Brook and K. Akins, 284-305. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58. Marasco, P. D., K. Kim, J. E. Colgate, M. A. Peshkin, and T. A. Kuiken. 2011. Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees. Brain 134(3): 747-758. doi: 10. 1093/brain/awq361.
59. Menary, R. 2010. Cognitive integration and the extended mind. In The extended mind, ed. R. Menary, 227-244. Cambridge: MIT.
60. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1945/1962. Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
61. Meteyard, L., S. R. Cuadrado, B. Bahrami, and G. Vigliocco. 2012. Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex. doi: 10. 1016/j. cortex. 2010. 11. 002.
62. Metzinger, T. 2003. Being no one: The self-model theory of subjectivity. Cambridge: MIT.
63. Miall, R. C., and D. M. Wolpert. 1996. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks 9(8): 1265-1279. doi: 10. 1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4.
64. Millikan, R. G. 1995. Pushmi-pullyu representations. Philosophical Perspectives 9: 185-200.
65. Newport, R., R. Pearce, and C. Preston. 2010. Fake hands in action: Embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Experimental Brain Research 204(3): 385-395. doi: 10. 1007/s00221-009-2104-y.
66. O'Brien, G., and J. Opie. 2004. Notes toward a structuralist theory of mental representation. In Representation in mind: New approaches to mental representation, ed. H. Clapin, P. Staines, and P. Slezak, 1-20. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
67. Ostry, D., and A. Feldman. 2003. A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control. Experimental Brain Research 153(3): 275-288. doi: 10. 1007/s00221-003-1624-0.
68. Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L. W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M. H., Spivey, M., and McRae, K. (2011). The mechanics of embodiment: A dialogue on embodiment and computational modeling. [Original research]. Frontiers in Psychology 2. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2011. 00005.
69. Port, R. F., and van Gelder, T. (Eds.). 1995. Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. MIT Press.
70. Prinz, J. 2009. Is consciousness embodied? In The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, ed. P. Robbins and M. Aydede, 419-437. New York: Cambridge University Press.
71. Rowlands, M. 2006. Body language: Representation in action. Cambridge: MIT.
72. Shapiro, L. A. 2010. Embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.
73. Smith, B. C. 1996. On the origin of objects. Cambridge: MIT.
74. Sutton, J. 2010. Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In The extended mind, ed. R. Menary, 189-226. Cambridge: MIT.
75. Thagard, P. 2005. Mind: Introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT.
76. Thelen, E., and L. B. Smith. 1994. A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge: MIT.
77. Turvey, M. T. 1990. Coordination. American Psychologist 45: 938-953.
78. Turvey, M. T., and C. Carello. 1995. Some dynamical themes in perception and action. In Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition, ed. R. Port and T. van Gelder, 373-401. Cambridge: MIT.
79. van Gelder, T. 1995. What might cognition be, if not computation? The Journal of Philosophy 92(7): 345-381.
80. Varela, F. J., E. Thompson, and E. Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT.
81. Wexler, M., S. M. Kosslyn, and A. Berthoz. 1998. Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition 68(77-94).
82. Wheeler, M. 2005. Reconstructing the cognitive world: The next step. Cambridge: MIT.
83. Wilson, M. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(4): 625-636.
84. Wilson, R. A. 2004. Boundaries of the mind: The individual in the fragile sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Wilson, R., and Foglia, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2011 edition), ed. E. N. Zalta. Retrieved from http://plato. stanford. edu/archives/fall2011/entries/embodied-cognition/.
86. Wolpert, D. M., and Z. Ghahramani. 2000. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience 3: 1212-1217.