Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: A short review

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2005, Pages

  Davidson, Paul R ^a   Wolpert, Daniel M ^b  

^a Van der Veer Institute New Zealand   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEDICAL IMAGING; PREDICTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; SENSORS;

PREDICTIVE CAPACITY; PREDICTIVE MODELS; SENSORIMOTOR SYSTEM; SKELETOMOTOR CONTROL;

NEUROLOGY;

ARM MOVEMENT; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GRIP STRENGTH; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCLE FUNCTION; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BRAIN; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PROPRIOCEPTION;

EID: 24044511160     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/S11     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Ariff G, Donchin O, Nanayakkara T and Shadmehr R 2002 A real-time state predictor in motor control: study of saccadic eye movements during unseen reaching movements J. Neurosci. 22 7721-9
2. Atkeson C G 1989 Learning arm kinematics and dynamics Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 12 157-83
3. Augurelle A S, Penta M, White O and Thonnard J L 2003 The effects of a change in gravity on the dynamics of prehension Exp. Brain Res. 148 533-40
4. Blakemore S J, Frith C D and Wolpert D M 1999 Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11 551-9
5. Bouisset S and Zattara M 1981 A sequence of postural movements precedes voluntary movement Neurosci. Lett. 22 263-70
6. Conditt M A, Gandolfo F and Mussa-Ivaldi F A 1997 The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience J. Neurophysiol. 78 544-60
7. Davidson P R and Wolpert D M 2004 Internal models underlying grasp can be additively combined Exp. Brain Res. 155 334-40
8. Flanagan J R and Lolley S 2001 The inertial anisotropy of the arm is accurately predicted during movement planning J. Neurosci. 21 1361-9
9. Flanagan J R, Vetter P, Johansson R S and Wolpert D M 2003 Prediction precedes control in motor learning Curr. Biol. 13 146-50
10. Flanagan J R and Wing A M 1997 The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads J. Neurosci. 17 1519-28
11. Gentili R, Cahouet V, Ballay Y and Papaxanthis C 2004 Inertial properties of the arm are accurately predicted during motor imagery Behav. Brain Res. 155 231-9
12. Glasauer S 2003 Cerebellar contribution to saccades and gaze holding: a modeling approach Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 1004 206-19
13. Gordon A M, Forssberg H and Iwasaki N 1994 Formation and lateralization of internal representations underlying motor commands during precision grip Neuropsychologia 32 555-68
14. Gordon A M, Forssberg H, Johansson R S and Westling G 1991 Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip Exp. Brain Res. 83 477-82
15. Gordon A M, Westling G, Cole K J and Johansson R S 1993 Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects J. Neurophysiol. 69 1789-96
16. Haruno M, Wolpert D M and Kawato M 2001 Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control Neural Comput. 13 2201-20
17. Imamizu H, Kuroda T, Miyauchi S, Yoshioka T and Kawato M 2003 Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 5461-6
18. Johansson R S and Cole K J 1992 Sensory-motor coordination during grasping and manipulative actions Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2 815-23
19. Johansson R S and Westling G 1988 Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip Exp. Brain Res. 71 59-71
20. Jordan M I and Rumelhart D E 1992 Forward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher Cogn. Sci. 16 307-54
21. Karniel A 2002 Three creatures named 'forward model' Neural Netw. 15 305-7
22. Kawato M 1999 Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9 718-27
23. Kawato M, Kuroda T, Imamizu H, Nakano E, Miyauchi S and Yoshioka T 2003 Internal forward models in the cerebellum: fMRI study on grip force and load force coupling Prog. Brain Res. 142 171-88
24. Lamberg E M, Mateika J H, Cherry L and Gordon A M 2003 Internal representations underlying respiration during object manipulation Brain. Res. 982 270-9
25. Mah C D and Mussa-Ivaldi F A 2003 Evidence for a specific internal representation of motion-force relationships during object manipulation Biol. Cybern 88 60-72
26. Marsden C D, Merton P A and Morton H B 1978 Anticipatory postural responses in the human subject (proceedings) J. Physiol. 275 47-48P
27. McIntyre J, Zago M, Berthoz A and Lacquaniti F 2001 Does the brain model Newton's laws? Nat. Neurosci. 4 693-4
28. Mehta B and Schaal S 2002 Forward models in visuomotor control J. Neurophysiol. 88 942-53
29. Miall R C and Wolpert D M 1996 Forward models for physiological motor control Neural Netw. 9 1265-79
30. Nanayakkara T and Shadmehr R 2003 Saccade adaptation in response to altered arm dynamics J. Neurophysiol. 90 4016-21
31. Nowak D A, Glasauer S and Hermsdorfer J 2004a How predictive is grip force control in the complete absence of somatosensory feedback? Brain 127 182-92
32. Nowak D A and Hermsdorfer J 2003 Sensorimotor memory and grip force control: does grip force anticipate a self-produced weight change when drinking with a straw from a cup? Eur. J. Neurosci. 18 2883-92
33. Nowak D A, Hermsdorfer J, Schneider E and Glasauer S 2004b Moving objects in a rotating environment: rapid prediction of Coriolis and centrifugal force perturbations Exp. Brain Res. 157 241-54
34. Nowak D A, Rosenkranz K, Hermsdorfer J and Rothwell J 2004c Memory for fingertip forces: passive hand muscle vibration interferes with predictive grip force scaling Exp. Brain Res. 156 444-50
35. Poon C S 1996 Self-tuning optimal regulation of respiratory motor output by hebbian covariance learning Neural Netw. 9 1367-83
36. Quaney B M, Rotella D L, Peterson C and Cole K J 2003 Sensorimotor memory for fingertip forces: evidence for a task-independent motor memory J. Neurosci. 23 1981-6
37. Roy J E and Cullen K E 2001 Selective processing of vestibular reafference during self-generated head motion J. Neurosci. 21 31-2142
38. Salimi I, Hollender I, Frazier W and Gordon A M 2000 Specificity of internal representations underlying grasping J. Neurophysiol. 84 2390-7
39. Shadmehr R and Mussa-Ivaldi F A 1994 Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task J. Neurosci. 14 3208-24
40. Shergill S S, Bays P M, Frith C D and Wolpert D M 2003 Two eyes for an eye: the neuroscience of force escalation Science 301 187
41. Sommer M A and Wurtz R H 2002 A pathway in primate brain for internal monitoring of movements Science 296 1480-2
42. von Holst E 1954 Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs Br. J. Animal Behav. 2 89-94
43. von Holst E and Mittelstaedt H 1950 Das Reafferenzprinzip (Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie) Naturwissenschaften 37 464-76
44. Weiskrantz L, Elliott J and Darlington C 1971 Preliminary observations on tickling oneself Nature 230 598-9
45. Wolpert D M, Ghahramani Z and Jordan M I 1995 An internal model for sensorimotor integration Science 269 1880-2
46. Zago M, Bosco G, Maffei V, Iosa M, Ivanenko Y P and Lacquaniti F 2004a Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions J. Neuropliysiol. 91 1620-34
47. Zago M, Bosco G, Maffei V, Iosa M, Ivanenko Y P and Lacquaniti F 2004b Fast adaptation of the internal model of gravity for manual interceptions: evidence for event-dependent learning J. Neurophysiol. 93 1055-63
48. Zupan L H, Merfeld D M and Darlot C 2002 Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements Biol. Cybern. 86 209-30