Structure refinement of protein model decoys requires accurate side-chain placement

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 469-478

  Olson, Mark A ^a   Lee, Michael S ^a,b  

^a UNITED STATES ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

^b U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conformational sampling; Langevin dynamics; Molecular dynamics; Protein structure prediction; Statistical potential; Structure recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SELF GUIDED LANGEVIN DYNAMICS; SIMULATION; TEMPERATURE; TEMPERATURE BASED REPLICA EXCHANGE SIMULATION;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; SOLVENTS;

EID: 84873094319     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24204     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Zhang Y. I-TASSER: fully automated protein structure prediction in CASP8. Proteins 2009; 77 ( Suppl 9): 100-113.
2. Zhang Y. Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins 2007; 69 ( Suppl 8): 108-117.
3. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc 2010; 5: 725-738.
4. Xu D, Zhang J, Roy A, Zhang, Y. Automated protein structure modeling in CASP9 by I-TASSER pipeline combined with QUARK-based ab initio folding and FG-MD-based structure refinement. Proteins 2011; 79 ( Suppl 10): 147-160.
5. Kinch L, Shi SY, Cong Q, Cheng H, Liao Y, Grishin NV. CASP9 assessment of free modeling target predictions. Proteins 2011; 79 ( Suppl 10): 59-73.
6. MacCallum JL, Hua L, Schnieders MJ, Pande VS, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. Assessment of the protein structure refinement category in CASP8. Proteins 2009; 77 ( Suppl 9): 66-80.
7. MacCallum JL, Pérez A, Schnieders MJ, Hua L, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP. Proteins 2011; 79 ( Suppl 10): 74-90.
8. Misura KMS, Baker D. Progress and challenges in high-resolution refinement of protein structure models. Proteins 2005; 59: 15-29.
9. Chopra G, Summa CM, Levitt M. Solvent dramatically affects protein structure refinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 20239-20244.
10. Fan H, Mark AE. Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques. Protein Sci 2004; 13: 211-220.
11. Lee MR, Tsai J, Baker D, Kollman PA. Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 2001; 313: 417-430.
12. Sellers BD, Zhu K, Zhao S, Friesner RA, Jacobson MP. Toward better refinement of comparative models: predicting loops in inexact environments. Proteins 2008; 72: 959-971.
13. Wroblewska L, Skolnick J. Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein's native structure among misfolded structures? I. Large scale amber benchmarking. J Comput Chem 2007; 28: 2059-2066.
14. Zhu J, Fan H, Periole X, Honig B, Mark AE. Refining homology models by combining replica-exchange molecular dynamics and statistical potentials. Proteins 2008; 72: 1171-1188.
15. Chen J, Brooks CL, III. Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure? Proteins 2007; 67: 922-930.
16. Wu X, Brooks BR. Self-guided Langevin dynamics simulation method. Chem Phys Lett 2003; 381: 512-518.
17. Lee MS, Olson MA. Protein folding simulations combining self-guided Langevin dynamics and temperature-based replica exchange. J Chem Theory Comput 2010; 6: 2477-2487.
18. Lee MS, Olson MA. Comparison of two adaptive temperature-based replica exchange methods applied to a sharp phase transition of protein unfolding-folding. J Chem Phys 2011; 134: 244111-244117.
19. Olson MA, Chaudhury S, Lee MS. Comparison between self-guided Langevin dynamics and molecular dynamics simulations for structure refinement of protein loop conformations. J Comput Chem 2011; 32: 3014-3022.
20. Brooks BR, Brooks CLIII, Mackerell ADJr, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, Won Y, Archontis G, Bartels C, Boresch S, Caflisch A, Caves L, Cui Q, Dinner AR, Feig M, Fischer S, Gao J, Hodoscek M, Im W, Kuczera K, Lazaridis T, Ma J, Ovchinnikov V, Paci E, Pastor RW, Post CB, Pu JZ, Schaefer M, Tidor B, Venable RM, Woodcock HL, Wu X, Yang W, York DM, Karplus M. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 2009; 30: 1545-1614.
21. Mackerell ADJr, Feig M, Brooks CLIII., Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 2004; 25: 1400-1415.
22. Krivov GG, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RLJr., Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins 2009; 77: 778-795.
23. Chaudhury S, Olson MA, Tawa G, Wallqvist A, Lee MS. Efficient conformational sampling in explicit solvent using a hybrid replica exchange molecular dynamics method. J Chem Theory Comput 2012; 8: 677-687.
24. Wu X, Brooks BR. Toward canonical ensemble distribution from self-guided Langevin dynamics simulation. J Chem Phys 2011; 134: 134108-134119.
25. Ryckaert J-P, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 1977; 23: 327-341.
26. Ishikawa Y, Sugita Y, Nishikawa T, Okamoto Y. Ab initio replica-exchange Monte Carlo method for cluster studies. Chem Phys Lett 2001; 33: 199-206.
27. Lee MS, Feig M, Salsbury FRJr, Brooks CLIII., New analytic approximation to the standard molecular volume definition and its application to generalized Born calculations. J Comput Chem 2003; 24: 1348-1356.
28. Feig M, Karanicolas J, Brooks CLIII., MMTSB tool set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology. J Mol Graph Model 2004; 22: 377-395.
29. Rotkiewicz P, Skolnick J. Fast procedure for reconstruction of full-atom protein models from reduced representations. J Comput Chem 2008; 29: 1460-1465.
30. Zhang J, Zhang Y. A novel side-chain orientation dependent potential derived from random-walk reference state for protein fold selection and structure prediction. PLoS One 2010; 5: e15386.
31. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kalé L, Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 2005; 26: 1781-1802.
32. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983; 79: 926-935.
33. Lee MS, Olson MA. Assessment of detection and refinement strategies for de novo protein structures using force field and statistical potentials. J Chem Theory Comput 2007; 3: 312-324.
34. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 2002; 11: 2714-2726.
35. Raval A, Piana S, Eastwood MP, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Refinement of protein structure homology models via long, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 2012; 80: 2071-2079.